While I think O'Bummer mis-lead people, I blame the insurance companies for cancelling policies instead of modifying them to meet the law.
Really...how much would it have cost insurers to add maternity coverage for you single guys? It's not like you'd ever use it...and it doesn't cover your girlfriend, she'd have her own coverage. (and try as you may, you're not gonna knock up Rosy Palm)
This is outside my area of expertise so what I'm wondering may be impractical or impossible to reasonably ask, but I wonder if there is enough data given to reach more soundly based estimates?
There's an unfortunate human tendency to assume that everything everyone else does is easy.Unfortunately, it's not as simple as adding maternity coverage to a policy form for men and adding $0 to the premium (since the expected utilization is zero). 45 C.F.R. § 156.80 mandates that an insurer develop a market-wide index rate that is applied equally to all polices. Just by being in the risk pool, males have to bear that index rate, of which maternity coverage is a component.
Yet your earlier point about weighting for enrollment is entirely valid, and the lack of doing so makes me greatly mistrust the Manhattan Institute's honesty. There are a plethora of possible methodologies for any given subject, yet any methodology which appears to give one result when the actual result may be wildly different is too flawed to use. If the average premium increase for all possible choices is reported as 142% whereas by your own calculations the average premium increase for all previously insured individuals is more like 17%, then it's hard to believe they honestly selected that methodology without regard to ideology, or even with a reasonable weighting of ideology.We have some studies that we've seen that attempt to compare, but even then they're prone to being inaccurate. Actuarial science is, despite its name, more of an art than a science and the underlying assumptions can make or break an analysis.
There's a reason that the Society of Actuaries and the American Academy of Actuaries have not weighed in on the issue: there is no fool-proof answer to the question, the markets are just too disparate to be compared.
Except he lost the election because of that line.
Obama wins elections after delivering such lines.
Because Obama wants your money in women's vaginas.![]()
Yeah he clearly lied, or didn't totally understand what was going to happen.
My plan is being canceled, but there is an almost identical plan being offered for a lower price, and I have many more options than I did before, I will be able to get something that more suits my needs and will allow me to spend much less money every month.
The vast majority of people will be able to keep their current plans except for the whose insurance is so crappy that it nearly rises to the level of fraud, like those who are paying out the ass after having been forced into high risk pools because they had the audacity to have a mild form of asthma. Those people plus the millions of people who will now qualify for medicaid and those who find out that they have been paying $300 a month with a high deductible and an expensive copay, all those will get a new insurance.
Yes Obama was certainly wrong. He should have said
But that isn't pithy enough so 4 years later all those people whose idea of health care reform amounted to sticking their fingers in the ears and going LALALALALALALA can now pretend they actually care.
If those plans are such crap, why are people finding nearly identical plans with Obamacare?
You do realize politifact has already said he was outright lying, don't you (along with basically anybody else with a shred of decency and objectivity)? Why are you still arguing it?Yes Obama was certainly wrong. He should have said
But that isn't pithy enough so 4 years later all those people whose idea of health care reform amounted to sticking their fingers in the ears and going LALALALALALALA can now pretend they actually care.
You do realize politifact has already said he was outright lying, don't you (along with basically anybody else with a shred of decency and objectivity)? Why are you still arguing it?
Take up this argument with all the major news publications, politifact, and basic ability to comprehend the spoken word.So if your wife tells you "if you like your car you can keep it" ate you going to go out and buy a tank and then say "but you said I can keep my tank!"
Or does common sense tell you she was referring to the car you had at the time of the statement?
Take up this argument with all the major news publications, politifact, and basic ability to comprehend the spoken word.
Again, you are arguing something already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to not be the case. You should be asking yourself why you are still defending a guy who already apologized for saying what you said he didn't say.
Yes Obama was certainly wrong. He should have said
But that isn't pithy enough so 4 years later all those people whose idea of health care reform amounted to sticking their fingers in the ears and going LALALALALALALA can now pretend they actually care.
So if your wife tells you "if you like your car you can keep it" ate you going to go out and buy a tank and then say "but you said I can keep my tank!"
Or does common sense tell you she was referring to the car you had at the time of the statement?
Nothing on "Obamacare" exchanges has a lifetime cap. Lifetime caps are illegal now
Blanket statements are dangerous; lifetime caps are illegal only on essential health benefits, and then only when expressed in dollars, and then mostly in the individual and small group markets.
Take up this argument with all the major news publications, politifact, and basic ability to comprehend the spoken word.
Again, you are arguing something already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to not be the case. You should be asking yourself why you are still defending a guy who already apologized for saying what you said he didn't say.
He apologized for people misunderstanding... He didn't say he lied.
FWIW I appreciate your insights you've given. Almost no thought is given to analysis, but there is much religious fervor. To borrow from the bible "I have not seen such faith, no not in all of Israel". It's good to have someone knowledgeable posting without a mandate to convert.
He apologized for people misunderstanding... He didn't say he lied.
How can one misunderstand what he clearly stated multiple times?
He did not use fancy or political words.
The biggest words were insurance and coverage
How can one misunderstand what he clearly stated multiple times?
He did not use fancy or political words.
The biggest words were insurance and coverage
This made me think of something I had read, that 20% of the population is clinically insane.
There are a bunch of different definitions of insanity. One is being unable to tell the difference between right and wrong (legal defense).
It isn't just a broken promise; he was saying this even after he knew it wasn't true. This compares starkly to the typical 'broken political promise'.
My point is, if someone looked up the evidence and still thinks Obama did not lie repeatedly, they're probably one of the 20%'ers and frankly not worth talking to.