• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Obama and the whole 'african american' thing

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
do those other countries have a "politically correct" movement in them like america does? personally i think the whole PC thing is crap. it should be at least renamed PP (politically polite). it is not correct at all, and rarely saves peoples feelings.

You don't see the media saying this and that "sucks" either... they say "poor performance" or "underperformed". Just like there's business-speak, there's media speak.

As commoners speaking to each other, we all know it's fine to say these things, but you would never say it in a national/formal setting. You get on a tv interview and claim something sucks, you're going to look unprofessional. It's just simple etiquette.

the PC movement here is more than just people in media or "professional" people. it is people in grocery stores correcting people. its busybodies telling others how to refer to others. newscasters here wouldnt say something sucked either, unless they were like that one guy on every station that gets to go there.

To be honest, I've never seen or experienced that myself where people stop others in everyday public places. From what I can see, there's more of an anti-PC movement (hold-off on the Mac jokes) moreso than the other way around. I guess I don't understand why being PC irritates people as much as it does. It's not exactly a problem we have to face. Think of it as having a certain respect for elderly or authorities. Ugh... maybe this is the wrong place for that statement.

Anti-PCers are as annoying as Hell. Mostly because they whine about anything else that requires them to change something, like Wearing Seatbelts, Women/Minorities in the Work Place, Women having Choice, wearing a Helmet, etc etc etc...

generalizing is fun! but youre not really spot on there. i have no problem with any of the supposed issues you put in there. i have a problem with people telling me my word of choice to describe something is wrong. if it is a curse word ill refrain from using it, if it is the N word or something akin to that i wont use them either. but really, im friggin bald. not follically challenged. my mom is short, not vertically challenged. we already have perfectly good words for most of the PC changes, why not use them. i wear my seat belt always, btw. i have a helmet for my mc as well, but rarely wear it. i see that as a personal choice, made with much knowledge of the negative side of that decision.

What about the "etc etc etc"? That covers EVERYTHING!! Gotcha!!! 😛😀

I should probably stop nesting quotations at some point, but I'll leave it for now.

Part of the rationale behind the whole PC movement is that the use of certain terms and descriptors can change the way people tend to think about those things, at least to some degree.

It's why in mental health, for example, professionals are moving away from labeling people as schizophrenic or depressed, and are instead saying "people with schizophrenia" or "people with depression" to drive home the point that these are people first, and that their illnesses do not define them.

But as with anything, these trends can be taken too far.
 
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.

You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.

Obama has African genes in his heritage.

He is not African American nor are you Asian American.

He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.

This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.

+1

The only thing is does is divide people.
 
Originally posted by: Dumac
The reason terms like African-American exists, despite how silly the term itself sounds, is because of the difference minorities feel from mainstream America.

Germans, Catholics, and many of the other hypothetical categories have voluntary ethnicity. A white German or Catholic can turn their ethnicity on or off as need be, and their ethnicity becomes symbolic.

African Americans, Asians, and other minorities wear their ethnicity on their skin, however. A black person can't turn on or off being considered black. Racial minorities can notice how others react to their skin color, and that skin color is an involuntary aspect of their persona. This is why silly terms like "African-American" are necessary, to show the separation that minorities feel from mainstream America.

This.

I'm sure many non-white people want race to not matter and then realized that it was always going to matter because people were always going to treat them differently. You can't tell these people that race doesn't matter; it's influenced the course of their whole lives.

The terminology is definitely fucked six ways from Sunday. But the experiences that the terminology refers to---those experiences matter.
 
When I was living in south Florida I was informed that a couple of very dark skinned co-workers were Cuban and not African Americans. Not Cuban American but Cuban. Needless to say, that was quite a reality check.
 
Originally posted by: Whisper

I should probably stop nesting quotations at some point, but I'll leave it for now.

Part of the rationale behind the whole PC movement is that the use of certain terms and descriptors can change the way people tend to think about those things, at least to some degree.

It's why in mental health, for example, professionals are moving away from labeling people as schizophrenic or depressed, and are instead saying "people with schizophrenia" or "people with depression" to drive home the point that these are people first, and that their illnesses do not define them.

But as with anything, these trends can be taken too far.

Good point. Society as a whole has progressed very much in terms of Tolerance, because of "PC". Until the '70's all sorts of People were Institutionalized and/or hidden to a great extent due to various Disabilities both Mental and Physical. "PC" gave them distinction and expanded the World View of Society as a whole to the point where many diverse peoples became normalized within Society.

Though I was accused of "Generalizing", not that I wasn't, the Generalizations prior to "PC" were much more entrenched and hurtful.
 
What I think is funny is that most "African-Americans" have had ancestors in the Americas for much, much longer than I have. My father was born in Italy, while on my mother's side, I have to go back to my great-grandparents, who were born in the Czech Republic and Ukraine sometime around the late 19th century.

Most black people in the U.S., though, can trace their American roots back hundreds of years, perhaps to as early as the 17th century. In some cases, they have to go back to the 1500s to get to their first African ancestors. By that measure, they are much more "American" than I am.
 
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Whisper

I should probably stop nesting quotations at some point, but I'll leave it for now.

Part of the rationale behind the whole PC movement is that the use of certain terms and descriptors can change the way people tend to think about those things, at least to some degree.

It's why in mental health, for example, professionals are moving away from labeling people as schizophrenic or depressed, and are instead saying "people with schizophrenia" or "people with depression" to drive home the point that these are people first, and that their illnesses do not define them.

But as with anything, these trends can be taken too far.

Good point. Society as a whole has progressed very much in terms of Tolerance, because of "PC". Until the '70's all sorts of People were Institutionalized and/or hidden to a great extent due to various Disabilities both Mental and Physical. "PC" gave them distinction and expanded the World View of Society as a whole to the point where many diverse peoples became normalized within Society.

Though I was accused of "Generalizing", not that I wasn't, the Generalizations prior to "PC" were much more entrenched and hurtful.

Exactly. While some of the new PC-ish terms are indeed useless and/or burdensome, many others have likely helped quite a bit in changing people's viewpoint regarding various groups and classes of individuals. If nothing else, they've made us more aware that these groups and classes exist.
 
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.

You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.

Obama has African genes in his heritage.

He is not African American nor are you Asian American.

He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.

This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.

All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.

why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"

or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"

or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"

why?...because it's fucking dumb.

Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.

but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?

....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.

If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.

I agree with what you said but i have a question on the bolded section. What do most people determine to be the deciding factor in this discussion. Say you and your spouse are from Germany but moved to america and had a baby of full German blood. Is he an Americon or a German living in America? So is it where you are born and live or what nationality your blood line is? And what happens if said baby moves to say France and lives out his days there. Is he German, American or is he now French?

I personally say im an American since i was born here and never lived anywhere else even though my blood line is of various mixed decents.

Just curoius.
 
The thing that bothers me is the people complaining about the "race card" are the very ones playing it and adjusting the definitions to fit them.

People opposing Affirmative Action say: "See, we don't need it, Obama is an African American, and he got elected President, so there is no more racism"

Others say: "I am just an American, period. You don't see me saying Polish American. If you say African American, you are not a patriot/un-American"

You can't have it both ways. You can use his heritage to pat yourselves on the back for electing a black man, then later say race is not important.
 
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.

You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.

Obama has African genes in his heritage.

He is not African American nor are you Asian American.

He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.

This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.

All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.

why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"

or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"

or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"

why?...because it's fucking dumb.

Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.

but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?

....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.

If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.


Wheezer, what do Jews call themselves?
 
Originally posted by: rh71
I'm considered asian american and I was born here. Why is everyone up in arms over the terminology the media uses for him?

He is of [some] african descent + american = african american.

I am of asian descent + american = I am asian american.

I can understand saying black is easier and well-accepted but what really is wrong with saying african american [even if not all africans now are black]? It's more about being a descendant which is the whole point in going to describe him as an American first in this context.

EDIT>>
and I just saw the other thread now.

what do you call a white guy from south Africa or Kenya?

 
Originally posted by: DnetMHZ
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.

You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.

Obama has African genes in his heritage.

He is not African American nor are you Asian American.

He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.

This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.

All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.

why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"

or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"

or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"

why?...because it's fucking dumb.

Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.

but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?

....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.

If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.

im gonna quote you because you said exactly what i was going to

this

 
Originally posted by: soulcougher73


I agree with what you said but i have a question on the bolded section. What do most people determine to be the deciding factor in this discussion. Say you and your spouse are from Germany but moved to america and had a baby of full German blood. Is he an Americon or a German living in America? So is it where you are born and live or what nationality your blood line is? And what happens if said baby moves to say France and lives out his days there. Is he German, American or is he now French?

I personally say im an American since i was born here and never lived anywhere else even though my blood line is of various mixed decents.

Just curoius.

if you were born in the US but your parents are geman citizens, then youll likely have dual citizenship. at least until youre 18 or so. if that same person chose US over german and then moved to france, they would be a us national living in france, not french. you have to apply for french citizenry to become french i believe, same as here (or probably any other country). my gramma was born here in az, but her two older sisters were born in mexico. my family has only been here for generations (and has done a great job of spreading across the southwest) but i still dont pull the meximerican card at all. i did try to capitalize on it for scholarships, and failed miserably. a couple even told me i didnt look "mexican" enough. i guess hazel eyes and dark blond hair wasnt close enough for the profile. doesnt change the fact that my dad is 100% mexican descent. whatever. i lost my point somewhere above here, sorry.
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: rh71
I'm considered asian american and I was born here. Why is everyone up in arms over the terminology the media uses for him?

He is of [some] african descent + american = african american.

I am of asian descent + american = I am asian american.

I can understand saying black is easier and well-accepted but what really is wrong with saying african american [even if not all africans now are black]? It's more about being a descendant which is the whole point in going to describe him as an American first in this context.

EDIT>>
and I just saw the other thread now.

what do you call a white guy from south Africa or Kenya?

afrikaaner?
 
Damn if we do, damn if we don't. No matter what we do we are damned.

When I was growing up, people (whites) would ask me where I was from. When I replied, "Maryland" they would say, "No, where did you really come from -- where was your birth country and how did you learn to speak English so well?". I would reply, "Oh, I was born here and my parents came from China".

So, to avoid this typical conversation, we just started calling our-selves "Chinese/Asian-American" to let people know where we came from without going into the above conversation.

Now, we get condemn for using that phrase even though I remember hearing the terms "Irish-American, Italian-American, Polish-American and German-American" when I was growing up.

It's sort of like how whites would lynch a black if he tried to socialized with whites in college (and a BIG IF the college would even let blacks into the school in the first place). So, blacks started their own "Black Student Union" where they can have a social life without fear of being lynched. But lo and behold, we now get complaints about how blacks are separatists by having these groups and how it's reverse racism.

Most of the things you complain about how minorities behave were caused by the things you did in the past. If we did something one way, we would get harrassed or lynched by some of you. If we do it the other way we would get accused of reverse discrimination by the rest of you.
 
^ I've had those experiences... I can't say I'm "American" when they are too. They asked for a reason. And I'm not just asian being born here (just as much as you're not polish if you were born here)... so what does that leave when I'm asked on a survey? I am a young asian-american ffs.

White people aren't asked the same way... you guys dropped it as soon as you were born here because you were never asked again.
 
Originally posted by: Dumac
The reason terms like African-American exists, despite how silly the term itself sounds, is because of the difference minorities feel from mainstream America.

Germans, Catholics, and many of the other hypothetical categories have voluntary ethnicity. A white German or Catholic can turn their ethnicity on or off as need be, and their ethnicity becomes symbolic.

African Americans, Asians, and other minorities wear their ethnicity on their skin, however. A black person can't turn on or off being considered black. Racial minorities can notice how others react to their skin color, and that skin color is an involuntary aspect of their persona. This is why silly terms like "African-American" are necessary, to show the separation that minorities feel from mainstream America.

While there are many here who tried to explain why the whole "african american" thing exists, you have nailed it.

America was founded by white people. The founding fathers were all white. Most of the immigrants that migrated to the U.S. in the 17th, 18th and 19th century were white. Consequently, the majority of the U.S. today is white, despite a continuous influx of non-white immigrants and will continue to be for a long time to come. The average "American" was considered to be white before and still is outside of the U.S. As such, the overwhelming majority of non-white Americans living in the U.S. at some point encounter the "XYZ-American" label, either imposed on them by others or as a mark of distinction that they themselves choose to use to achieve a purpose.
 
Originally posted by: rrahman1
I wonder if Asshole-American is an ethnicity? if not, it should be 🙂

So if you can't find one to use because you are a typical white American, you instead pick one based on your disposition?
 
Back
Top