Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
do those other countries have a "politically correct" movement in them like america does? personally i think the whole PC thing is crap. it should be at least renamed PP (politically polite). it is not correct at all, and rarely saves peoples feelings.
You don't see the media saying this and that "sucks" either... they say "poor performance" or "underperformed". Just like there's business-speak, there's media speak.
As commoners speaking to each other, we all know it's fine to say these things, but you would never say it in a national/formal setting. You get on a tv interview and claim something sucks, you're going to look unprofessional. It's just simple etiquette.
the PC movement here is more than just people in media or "professional" people. it is people in grocery stores correcting people. its busybodies telling others how to refer to others. newscasters here wouldnt say something sucked either, unless they were like that one guy on every station that gets to go there.
To be honest, I've never seen or experienced that myself where people stop others in everyday public places. From what I can see, there's more of an anti-PC movement (hold-off on the Mac jokes) moreso than the other way around. I guess I don't understand why being PC irritates people as much as it does. It's not exactly a problem we have to face. Think of it as having a certain respect for elderly or authorities. Ugh... maybe this is the wrong place for that statement.
Anti-PCers are as annoying as Hell. Mostly because they whine about anything else that requires them to change something, like Wearing Seatbelts, Women/Minorities in the Work Place, Women having Choice, wearing a Helmet, etc etc etc...
generalizing is fun! but youre not really spot on there. i have no problem with any of the supposed issues you put in there. i have a problem with people telling me my word of choice to describe something is wrong. if it is a curse word ill refrain from using it, if it is the N word or something akin to that i wont use them either. but really, im friggin bald. not follically challenged. my mom is short, not vertically challenged. we already have perfectly good words for most of the PC changes, why not use them. i wear my seat belt always, btw. i have a helmet for my mc as well, but rarely wear it. i see that as a personal choice, made with much knowledge of the negative side of that decision.
What about the "etc etc etc"? That covers EVERYTHING!! Gotcha!!! 😛😀
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.
You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.
Obama has African genes in his heritage.
He is not African American nor are you Asian American.
He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.
This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.
Originally posted by: Dumac
The reason terms like African-American exists, despite how silly the term itself sounds, is because of the difference minorities feel from mainstream America.
Germans, Catholics, and many of the other hypothetical categories have voluntary ethnicity. A white German or Catholic can turn their ethnicity on or off as need be, and their ethnicity becomes symbolic.
African Americans, Asians, and other minorities wear their ethnicity on their skin, however. A black person can't turn on or off being considered black. Racial minorities can notice how others react to their skin color, and that skin color is an involuntary aspect of their persona. This is why silly terms like "African-American" are necessary, to show the separation that minorities feel from mainstream America.
Originally posted by: Whisper
I should probably stop nesting quotations at some point, but I'll leave it for now.
Part of the rationale behind the whole PC movement is that the use of certain terms and descriptors can change the way people tend to think about those things, at least to some degree.
It's why in mental health, for example, professionals are moving away from labeling people as schizophrenic or depressed, and are instead saying "people with schizophrenia" or "people with depression" to drive home the point that these are people first, and that their illnesses do not define them.
But as with anything, these trends can be taken too far.
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Whisper
I should probably stop nesting quotations at some point, but I'll leave it for now.
Part of the rationale behind the whole PC movement is that the use of certain terms and descriptors can change the way people tend to think about those things, at least to some degree.
It's why in mental health, for example, professionals are moving away from labeling people as schizophrenic or depressed, and are instead saying "people with schizophrenia" or "people with depression" to drive home the point that these are people first, and that their illnesses do not define them.
But as with anything, these trends can be taken too far.
Good point. Society as a whole has progressed very much in terms of Tolerance, because of "PC". Until the '70's all sorts of People were Institutionalized and/or hidden to a great extent due to various Disabilities both Mental and Physical. "PC" gave them distinction and expanded the World View of Society as a whole to the point where many diverse peoples became normalized within Society.
Though I was accused of "Generalizing", not that I wasn't, the Generalizations prior to "PC" were much more entrenched and hurtful.
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.
You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.
Obama has African genes in his heritage.
He is not African American nor are you Asian American.
He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.
This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.
All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.
why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"
or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"
or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"
why?...because it's fucking dumb.
Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.
but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?
....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.
If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.
You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.
Obama has African genes in his heritage.
He is not African American nor are you Asian American.
He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.
This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.
All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.
why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"
or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"
or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"
why?...because it's fucking dumb.
Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.
but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?
....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.
If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.
Originally posted by: rh71
I'm considered asian american and I was born here. Why is everyone up in arms over the terminology the media uses for him?
He is of [some] african descent + american = african american.
I am of asian descent + american = I am asian american.
I can understand saying black is easier and well-accepted but what really is wrong with saying african american [even if not all africans now are black]? It's more about being a descendant which is the whole point in going to describe him as an American first in this context.
EDIT>>
and I just saw the other thread now.
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Because mutt isn't exactly a very nice way of describing a person.
Originally posted by: DnetMHZ
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Wheezer
well if you are born here, you are an American period.
You, in this case have Asian heritage in your genes.
Obama has African genes in his heritage.
He is not African American nor are you Asian American.
He is an American with African Heritage and you are an American with Asian heritage.
This whole idea of putting your heritage before your nationality is just bullshit.
All it is, is just people standing up pounding on their chests to affirm to everyone that they are not just your average run of the mill white man....well, no shit...I can tell that by looking at you.
why don't the Catholics say "Catholic-American"
or the Protestants say "Protestant-American"
or the Buddhists say "Buddhist-American"
why?...because it's fucking dumb.
Racism will NEVER...EVER go away...EVER....it is human nature to pick on someone who is not the same.
but, if you want to "try and get along"...then don't segregate yourself by proclaiming your heritage first....you want to put your heritage in there...fine....why not say American-Asian or American-African?
....why?...because that is just as fucking stupid.
If you are black and born here....you are an America...if your black and born in Germany...you are German....if you are Asian and born in Australia...you are Australian...your heritage means nothing to anyone but you and your family....so just stop it.
im gonna quote you because you said exactly what i was going to
this
Originally posted by: soulcougher73
I agree with what you said but i have a question on the bolded section. What do most people determine to be the deciding factor in this discussion. Say you and your spouse are from Germany but moved to america and had a baby of full German blood. Is he an Americon or a German living in America? So is it where you are born and live or what nationality your blood line is? And what happens if said baby moves to say France and lives out his days there. Is he German, American or is he now French?
I personally say im an American since i was born here and never lived anywhere else even though my blood line is of various mixed decents.
Just curoius.
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: rh71
I'm considered asian american and I was born here. Why is everyone up in arms over the terminology the media uses for him?
He is of [some] african descent + american = african american.
I am of asian descent + american = I am asian american.
I can understand saying black is easier and well-accepted but what really is wrong with saying african american [even if not all africans now are black]? It's more about being a descendant which is the whole point in going to describe him as an American first in this context.
EDIT>>
and I just saw the other thread now.
what do you call a white guy from south Africa or Kenya?
Originally posted by: Dumac
The reason terms like African-American exists, despite how silly the term itself sounds, is because of the difference minorities feel from mainstream America.
Germans, Catholics, and many of the other hypothetical categories have voluntary ethnicity. A white German or Catholic can turn their ethnicity on or off as need be, and their ethnicity becomes symbolic.
African Americans, Asians, and other minorities wear their ethnicity on their skin, however. A black person can't turn on or off being considered black. Racial minorities can notice how others react to their skin color, and that skin color is an involuntary aspect of their persona. This is why silly terms like "African-American" are necessary, to show the separation that minorities feel from mainstream America.
😕Originally posted by: rrahman1
I wonder if Asshole-American is an ethnicity? if not, it should be 🙂
Originally posted by: rrahman1
I wonder if Asshole-American is an ethnicity? if not, it should be 🙂