Throckmorton
Lifer
I'm fine but the saying is "never go full libtard". Which it's quite apparent many liberals have done in this thread in their justification of eating dog.
![]()
Please explain why eating a dog is wrong, but eating a pig is OK.
I'm fine but the saying is "never go full libtard". Which it's quite apparent many liberals have done in this thread in their justification of eating dog.
![]()
The funny thing to me is this "shocking" "news" is out of a 17 year old book that Obama himself wrote.
I never said that, what I have repeatedly said is that I want ID checks on normal balloting and an increase in security for absentee ballots. Look at what I posted and you'll see.
No reason to umm....uhhh...... you know, be so fucking wrong on the issue of what i've posted in the past.
You're thinking of Going Rogue, Sarah Palin's book. Her followers were buying them up by the truckload.The book was a best seller...his political donors bought thousands of them a piece. I heard they make good fire starters if you rip the pages out.
As usual, I pretended no such thing. I was simply explaining your behavior. You fail so hard at "clarifying" others' comments. You really should just stop. It might make you look less foolish. You have nowhere to go but up.All supporters of politicians do it. Pretending otherwise makes you look more foolilsh than you normally look.
You posted a link about absentee ballot fraud as justification for requiring DL checks at voting stations, then later engaged a desperate song and dance in an attempt to mitigate the butthurt. Stfu.
Um, context.
Does he eat them now?
Does that show he was a bad person?
Are all people in other countries that eat (or have to eat) dog "bad"?
Dogs are great when you have enough food to feed your family. All pets are, AAMOF. But when the reality comes to you eating or not, societal standards shift.
Go visit areas in North Vietnam or China. See how they feel about dog meat.
Stupid subject to be outraged over.
As usual, I pretended no such thing. I was simply explaining your behavior. You fail so hard at "clarifying" others' comments. You really should just stop. It might make you look less foolish. You have nowhere to go but up.
People are not outraged, nor do I believe the OP is outraged. The Dem camp makes having a dog on top of the car an issue. Apparently they did not read obama's book before trying to rile up their base with their "Mitt Romney hates pets" campaign.
This is going to be an ugly election... that is all I have to say about it.
Says the guy who's method of response is to secretly bump a thread, and then an hour later say hey did you read through the 10 pages of the thread I bumped (but couldnt bother linking to, because that would be to easy).
And then when you do look through thread it still fails to answer the question.
You're lying again, all butt-hurt because we demonstrated your precious ASSumptions were completely wrong. After you repeatedly showed you were too lazy to actually read any of the existing threads, I decided to help you out by bumping one of them. There was nothing secret about it, and I mentioned it after I did it. You should really ask yourself why you seem so incapable of supporting your positions honestly.
You're doing a fine job of that without my help.
Have you considered trying the search function? Too hard for you? How about looking at the other threads on the first page? I even bumped one for you. No, you don't want that because then you'd have to stop playing ignorant by posing phony arguments that have already been rebutted ... over and over.
Maybe if anyone ever read his piece of dogshit book there would have been more comments about it, was it one of those books that unions use to funnel money to a candidate? Off to the doghouse with Obama.
Do you even know what the word lie means?
I take it you never read the book and are doing your usual partisan uniformed opinion. I have read it-long before he became President and I challenge you (or any other dittoheads/Faux Newies) to actually read the book, but while doing so put it out of your mind who the author is.
I've read more than I wish to admit of celebrity autobiographies and politician's books, and this book (along with Sammy Davis, Jr's autobiography) is one of the very best. It's a very good study of what fatherhood is and what it means-from someone whose father was a self-involved POS and abandoned his son. This book is far, far from the usual empty fluff that politicians crank out as "books."
BTW eating dogs is extremely common in parts of Asia, as I'm sure OP knows, and the quoted part from Obama certainly doesn't indicate that he relished it.
he could serve a dog with an apple in its mouth for the white house dinner and i still wouldent care
What if he'd been eating jackal instead of dog? Is it a species thing?
As usual, I pretended no such thing. I was simply explaining your behavior. You fail so hard at "clarifying" others' comments. You really should just stop. It might make you look less foolish. You have nowhere to go but up.
You mean Gingrich camp made it an issue. Apparently you forgot that in your rush to blame the Democrats for everything.
He put pickle relish on his dog meat? Kind of like a ball park hot dog?
Your reading comprehension is absolutely miserable. Kind of ironic since you constantly bitch about others in that regard.