O&O Defrag and Vista

[imported_Salamander]

I have Vista (32 version). Is there any advantage to using O&O Defrag (version 10) over the default defrag?

 

[nerp]

No.

 

[Mem]

Originally posted by: Salamander
I have Vista (32 version). Is there any advantage to using O&O Defrag (version 10) over the default defrag?

I use O&O 10 defrag in Vista x64,only advantage I can see is the choice of defrags O&O gives you ie...stealth,space,complete name,complete acess,complete modified.


Now if you asked me do I prefer O&O defrag over Vista's built-in one then my answer is yes.

 

[jonmcc33]

Originally posted by: Mem
Now if you asked me do I prefer O&O defrag over Vista's built-in one then my answer is yes.

Why? Vista's built-in defrag is flawless and needs no hands on!

 

[Mem]

Originally posted by: jonmcc33

Originally posted by: Mem
Now if you asked me do I prefer O&O defrag over Vista's built-in one then my answer is yes.

Why? Vista's built-in defrag is flawless and needs no hands on!

I prefer to choose my defrag method,its not always the same one I use,O&O is fast too.

 

[Rottie]

Nothinman said.....

"Stop worrying about little, largely irrelevant things like disk fragmentation and actually use your computer."

I think you guys should take his word for it seriously....

 

[Noema]

Defrag? What's that?

Oh, right...I've been using Vista's automatic defrag for so long I don't think about such things anymore.

 

[Nothinman]

Why? Vista's built-in defrag is flawless and needs no hands on!

No one ever said it was flawless but it does the job well enough that you shouldn't worry about it. And you especially shouldn't waste money on another defrag tool.