• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NYPD cop turns himself in after video of him surfaces

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I guess pro-cop agenda is blindly defending police at every chance.

Makes me wonder what this piece of shit pig does when there isn't a camera on him.

Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.
 
Subyman is working overtime in the Georgia cop thread defending the chief of police there who "accidentally" shot his wife. He's the one with the agenda. Me? I'm as impartial as they come, always looking at both sides of the story before stating my opinion.

I think you need to reread my posts moron. I am advocating for people to wait for all the facts before throwing around accusations or judgements.
 
sounds like the new "I smelled marijuana" excuse...

May or may not be an excuse. He obviously overreacted. I doubt he randomly beat the crap out of a woman for the jollies. I wouldn't be surprised if she either tried to grab him, bumped him, or in someway made him feel like he was being pickpocketed. I'm not saying she did, but that could have been his motivation for the attack. It does not excuse his behavior, but it is an interesting bit of information.

The headline of an offduty cop randomly giving woman beat downs has a high clickbait factor though.
 
Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.


Guess what? Pigs are employees not members of a religion or race therefore they do not get the same protection and I reserve the right to stereotype the shit out of them 😉
 
May or may not be an excuse. He obviously overreacted. I doubt he randomly beat the crap out of a woman for the jollies. I wouldn't be surprised if she either tried to grab him, bumped him, or in someway made him feel like he was being pickpocketed. I'm not saying she did, but that could have been his motivation for the attack. It does not excuse his behavior, but it is an interesting bit of information.

The headline of an offduty cop randomly giving woman beat downs has a high clickbait factor though.

Don't softpeddle, give us your real opinion, "COPS are God and can do no wrong." She did something to set him off is the excuse abusive spouses use to justify their abuse. Is this something you practise?
 
Why do we baby them? Police should be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.

As it currently stands any cop is a bad cop. All the good cops have quit, nobody with any moral character would be willing to be part of an organization that protects murderers.


I am very serious about this, not joking this time. The police have become their own mafia, and I do believe that any person who really, truly wanted to protect and serve would have quit or been fired for insubordination.
 
Last edited:
May or may not be an excuse. He obviously overreacted. I doubt he randomly beat the crap out of a woman for the jollies. I wouldn't be surprised if she either tried to grab him, bumped him, or in someway made him feel like he was being pickpocketed. I'm not saying she did, but that could have been his motivation for the attack. It does not excuse his behavior, but it is an interesting bit of information.

The headline of an offduty cop randomly giving woman beat downs has a high clickbait factor though.

I think you need to reread my posts moron. I am advocating for people to wait for all the facts before throwing around accusations or judgements.

Yeah, I can see that. You're not speculating at all. No siree🙄🙄🙄
 
Don't softpeddle, give us your real opinion, "COPS are God and can do no wrong." She did something to set him off is the excuse abusive spouses use to justify their abuse. Is this something you practise?

Nope. Cops should be treated the same as everyone else. I never said it was an excuse. I even stated if she did try to pickpocket him it was an "obvious overreaction." Maybe read first?
 
Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.

Your attempt to equate a group of people who chose to be part of that group with a group of people who had zero choice in being part of their group is logically incorrect. You know that, though, don't you? Stop being "astounded" because it's not a double standard. Cops get to CHOOSE to be cops. They choose to be a part of a group that passes extra bills of right for themselves but exempt everyone else from those rights. They choose to be a part of a group that hands out tickets costing hundreds of dollars for behavior that they themselves participate in off duty and would be butt-rage furious if they received a similar ticket. They choose to be part of a group that is known to routinely lie in court in order to take freedom away from people. They choose to be part of a group that violently raids people's private homes over plants that make people feel happy. They choose to be part of a group that believes that it is morally right to beat someone senseless who runs away from them...even when that person gives up peacefully. They choose to be part of a group that routinely goes undercover in peaceful protests to agitate and even participate in violence.

No, the double standard isn't the n-word vs cops. The double standard is how cops treat people vs how they expect/demand to be treated. I would expect that any non-cop would dislike this double standard because it is unfair and immoral. Surely you too dislike this double standard?
 
Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.

Its probably because joining the police is voluntary. Also its a job. Also they have a habit of consistently violating the rights of minority groups. Something I'm sure you are perfectly ok with, after all, if they didn't want to be shot by a cop, why are they black?
 
LOL....funny how cops get all sort of preferential treatment by the media.

Link

NY Daily news changed their quote about the assault once they found out it was a cop......and then downplayed it.

difference-in-reporting.png


Funny how the story line completely changed. Kind of like black kids being portrayed as "Hulk Hogan".

Yup, no police bias found.
 
My friend was a cop.

He old me it's like this: When I tell you to jump, you ask me how high!

Cops are always 100% correct. You never bad mouth a cop, and you listen.

🙁
 
The conductor said Lolja became irate and belligerent on the platform when informed that he’d have to wait 20 minutes for the next train because of a service change.

At one point, he demanded the conductor call the command center to learn the exact location of the nearest train, she said. He also demanded the transit workers’ names, which they are not supposed to reveal, and followed them around the platform, sticking his cellphone “in our faces,” the conductor said.

“I don’t know if he was doing video or taking pictures, but it was one or the other,” she said. “He was so in my face, when I put my hands up to block him, his phone fell. I went to shield my face because I didn’t know what he was going to do. I just wanted to get out of this man’s way.”

Police on Wednesday released a video showing a man running from the Tremont Ave. station with a smirk on his face. He was a suspect in the attack, police said, asking the public to call them with tips about his identity.

On Thursday, six days after the incident, Mirjan walked into a precinct and told other officers he was the man in the video. He claimed the conductor started the confrontation by grabbing his cellphone.

He hasn’t been charged, but odds are that he will. Most cops are good and they don’t run.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...rs-stop-nypd-fleeing-attack-article-1.2065747

UPDATES, I HAS THEM.
 
Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.

Well one race has to do with color,race which you can't change. Thats what is off bounds. I have not seen anyone get banned over hatred and vitriolic remarks against religion.
 
Why don't you just change the "p" in pig to an "n". Your stereotyping and hatred go well with either interpretation.

I'm still astounded the the double standard allowed here. Hatred and vitriolic stereotyping can be thrown at police, but if it's at a particular color or religion *bam* with the ban stick.

Does speaking out against criminal behavior done by police make one anti-police? Are all police bad? No, of course not but the bad ones make the headlines.
 
That guy's a real man-child. Do you think she still tried to pickpocket him or tried to steal his cellphone, Officer Subyman?

1.) Tries to tell people to wait for facts
2.) Uses some probable scenarios to show why people shouldn't jump to conclusions
3.) Facts come out
4.) I use those facts to further define my opinion on the matter
5.) Facts happen to align with others opinion they held without any facts
6.) I get attacked because their previously baseless opinion ended up aligning with said facts

I was never on anyone's side, as I've said before. Notice how my opinion becomes further defined by the release of facts? That's how you should go through life.
 
Back
Top