Ronin
Diamond Member
Hi, Mr. I don't Troll.
Good post. Keep proving me right, as we watch your credibility twirl down the toilet. Like I said originally: stones and glass houses.
Originally posted by: Ronin
God, you're the epitome of horse blinders. Believe what you want. The memory usage is horrendous, and you refuse to admit it. That's just plain silly. Read through your sad little thread again and see several people telling you that the difference is easily noticeable.
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
your insults + flaming :
So like your other arguments, you can't actually produce evidence to back up your accustaions? Try to stick to what you claim.
I'm still waiting for those posts you claim where I'm advocating the bannning of other members who disagree with me.beggerking:
now I see your only purpose here is simply to ban and insult anyone who has a different opinion than you.
RobertR1's insults:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry to be a bit off topic but after being on several different message boards for various things: motrocycles, cars and computers, beggerking takes the cake as being the most annoying/irritating/argumentative (without sufficient knowledge) personality by a large margin. If there was a f'in crown, I'd hand it to you, buddy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is getting ridiculous. You're the only one who's having these major issue with an the x1800xl. Everyone else is fine. For a self proclaimed enthusiast who goes through cards at a ridiculous rate, you'd be semi competant at installing a new card. Obviously not the case.
I hope the nickles and dimes being tossed your way are worth the various defmation tactics against one company that you constantly spew on here. You're a sad lilttle man.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your lawsuit is pathetic, at best. If it'll help you sleep easier at night at the thought of being able to sue him for defamation, then please, by all accounts, continue to believe it. I'm sure attorney's are lined up at your door to take a crack at this jackpot. Hell, they might even forego their retainer fees and do it on contingency since it's a slam dunk!
Thanks for the laugh, champ!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's like opening 10ie windows in the backgroud and blaming MS for your ****** gaming performance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post when you're sober, wreckage........
This is why your arguments are lame, at best. First you accused me of trying/wanting to get members banned. When you came up with absolutely NOTHING you resorted to "but you make insults!!!!" Notice how you completely abandoned your statement. Quit grasping.
The sober comment to wreckage was right after he admitted that he's had a bit too much to drink and thus inspired to start flaming. His words, not mine.
How am I wrong about the nickles and dimes comment? It's VERY clear that rollo did receive free hardware from nvidia. Just not to you, it would seem.
Please try to counter the lawsuit comment. I'd love to hear your rationale. Ronin isn't exactly know for his PC form of communication either.
Your arugement in the CCC thread was lame. You jumped all over the place hoping to catch an angle and come out right. You did the same thing as you're doing now. Started off with one thing, got shot down, reverted to a whole other point, shot down....rinse and repeat.
nice way to start an argument.
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
oh ya, CCC thread. Have you contributed anything other than flame there? do you have any real knowledge? or are you just a 10 yr old bad mouthing kid?
knight was trying to prove me wrong of my theory, then we found out from his own school diagram I was actually correct. If you don't know, stfu.
Originally posted by: Janooo
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
...
Gsellis! If I had 10 dollars and you were in person here, i'd give it to you. Wow, he was right on the money... LOL
Originally posted by: gsellis
I am going to grab some popcorn and a lawn chair and wait for him to call you an ATI fanboy ;POriginally posted by: ArchAngel777
Who were you before you were banned a few weeks ago?
Ahhh... It looks like we have ah heck figured out pretty well.
Gsellis, you are good. You saw right through him.![]()
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: justly
This morning I read the poll that was added, since I haven't commented up untill now (though I have felt like it a few times) this may be a good time to address this.
First off I think the poll is flawed. We have heard a few different perspectives about what exactly AEG does. If AEG (or the company they work for) provide their "focus group" with negative information/links about the competition, or promote/condone members of their "focus group" to activily spread this negative information about competetors products then I definatly think it is NOT OK. If these "focus groups" are asked to conduct themselves as an actual company rep would I see no problem (to my knowlage a "true company rep" would only point out that their product is superior to the competition, not activily try to discredit the competition). IMO the idea that company reps help people with problems related to their product while also providing positive aspects of their products for marketing purposes is not only acceptable but can be a very usefull tool (in most cases) to the consumer.
I hope this doesn't sound like I'm defending Rollo, I'm not. I think Rollo is quite often biased and condescending tward other members. While Rollos posts may be an annoyance to some members I don't think that alone or even the fact that he is affiliated with AEG should be grounds to ban him. What I have a problem with is that Rollo did not disclose his affiliation with AEG/nvidia and tried to discredit the competition (and any member that could see a positive aspect about the competition) at every opportunity. Sometimes this was done using obscure sites that would have required some very agressive reaserch on his part or there is the possibility this information was supplied to him from contacts within the focus group, AEG or even nvidia itself. If it was proven that any of this negative information is being supplied to Rollo because of his association with AEG then I would hope for a premanant ban of Rollo and anyone else associated with this type of organazation. For now I don't see a valid reason to actually ban Rollo, but I do hope AT gives him a stearn warning and provide stricter moderation in the video fourm.
Wow, it looks like you tolerate that type of behavior... As far as I am concerned being like that habbitually is grounds for a ban. So, is that your other account Rollo?
Quite honestly, any of these people subtly defending Rollo could be him on his "other" ISP... I don't quite trust this place (Internet in general) because people can manage multiple accounts... "The Turtle" is proof of that...
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: ArchAngel777
Originally posted by: crazydingo
Joker isnt slanted like you falsely accuse him to be. Now we know where you are coming from.Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Wanna know what the difference is, Keys? Rollo annoyed a lot of people here with the way he incessantly tried to bash ATI at every opportunity. He antagonized a lot of people in the flamewars that he started. So all this backlash against him upon finding out he was all the while part of an Nvidia marketing program should not come as any surprise. People on the other boards didn't have to put up with his nonsense, his non-stop ATI bashing and Nvidia evangelism.
Actually, Joker is annoying me now. Lets ban him? for bashing NV at every oppertunity.. oh ya, you bash NV at every oppertunity too... lets ban everybody who doesn't agree with me...pick on them every oppertunity..
do I sound like you/joker now?
I agree, Joker is a great guy and he isn't pro nVidia or ATI. Joker (myself and others include) are tired of the double standards used here. We seen one company get slaughtered for something and then see how some companies are exempt from it... It just isn't right. People have been bashing ATI way to much lately and I fear it is the direct result of people that have an agenda.
Someone trying to skew the facts and suggest a GTX 512 is a better card than the 1900XTX is quite frankly, on crack. Why pay $200+ more for essentially the same thing, but with a different brand? Oh wait, because they are skewing the cards towards nVidia.
Buggerking needs to get lost around here too... He is by far the most anoying person and is quite possibly on par with "Teh Turtle".
Thanks ArchAnglel and I agree, BeggerKing is nothing but a troll that tries to stir up flames. I wonder if he's been banned from here before?
my attempts to counter your FUD always seemed to anger you. . . . kinda like you angered just about everybody else . . . and i only post on this board . . . [but might consider B3B].Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: Bumrush99
Does it really matter if Rollo gets banned? Every new post, every reply he makes will be shot down with answers that will be linked to this post. The damage is already done, he no longer has any legitimacy in these forums. Banning him will not change his status here. It is already ruined.
I'd think my credibility would go up from this.
My benchmarks were always verifiable, and now you have a lot more reason to believe any info I give you about nVidia products comes from nVidia.
you are living in a fantasy world if you believe ANYONE but the most naive would believe you . . . now . . . you have a well-established pattern of abusing other members from the first day you joined ATF
:thumbsdown:
Who lead the AEG focus group, Rollo? You?
LOL.
Yes I am the criminal mastermind guiding the six of us as we change the face of the internet as you know it, making it a hostile concentration camp where no thoughts other than happy dreams of nVidia are permitted.
:roll:
I think the other guys would laugh hard at your post, my flamboyant ways have never been appreciated by the rest.
As I said earlier, we don't all have to be politically correct clones spouting all sides of every issue.
We're allowed opinions, and my not changing my style of posting for this user group is an indication of my conviction.
If they want me post happy thoughts of nVidia only, they should throw me out now, because I plan to keep posting what I think of all video cards in the fashion I have been.
If they throw me out, and if AT throws me out, I'll keep posting in the same fashion on another board as I have done for the last 10 years.
People who try to control freedom of speech because they don't like what you say anger me.
Originally posted by: anandtechrocks
Ronin, I?m impartial to the whole Nvidia/ ATI battle but I know from experience that CCC (I'm looking at it) does not take up 70 MB of RAM.
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
he has his opinion.. he likes gtx 512mb, so that means he is going to sell it?
Dear lord!!! I really wish you would go read that thread where he was trying to recommend the 512 GTX over the X1900. You misunderstand a lot of posts.
Here's the link click
You know, I didn't wanna bring this up BUT, I have to ask you something beggerking. Some of what other members have posted on this forum has been misinterpreted by you and then when corrected you think they're flaming you. Anyway I'll get to the point.
Is ENGLISH your first language??? THere's nothing wrong with that cause even me, my first language is not ENGLISH (I mean my real name is in my forum name and it's not like John or Tom or something so you know english is not my first language). Anyway, I think you misunderstand a lot of posts and then write something that doesn't always answer a post you quoted from someone else.
Please...PLEASE...before replying to someone's post read it and understand it as well as the context that it's in because I find it really difficult to completely understand your posts.
Let me reiterate...I'm NOT FLAMING you...just trying to understand is all.
Same people, alter egos.... Joking of course, but if it were true, I would not be surprised.
As far as the X1900 Versus GTX 512... Well... I think every honest person knows that the X1900 is the better purchase right now.
As far as the launches... nVidia did have a great 7800 GTX launch. But their 512 GTX was phantom for the most part. It is overpriced as well... But I still consider is a great card, just overpriced.
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
Originally posted by: Ronin
Originally posted by: anandtechrocks
Ronin, I?m impartial to the whole Nvidia/ ATI battle but I know from experience that CCC (I'm looking at it) does not take up 70 MB of RAM.
RAM, no. We're talking total memory. You obviously didn't read the thread, nor have any idea what we're talking about. Until you have, stop posting about it. It was either Matthias or Pete would did some comparisons that showed the increases with and without CCC (and CCC trimmed down, which shouldn't have to be done just to get it's memory usage down). Go check those out.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: Ronin
God, you're the epitome of horse blinders. Believe what you want. The memory usage is horrendous, and you refuse to admit it. That's just plain silly. Read through your sad little thread again and see several people telling you that the difference is easily noticeable.
I don't need people telling me anything. You tried trolling by posting loading peak memory usage (which lasts about 1-2 secs) as standard for CCC and got caught. But what else would I expect from someone that gets welfare cards from nVidia, works for nVidia's partner Sony and moderates nVidia's nZone forums.
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
Find me the evidence to support your claims about me trying/asking to get people banned and I'll reply to your CCC "argument."
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
You were claiming there is a performance hit despite everyone telling you to the contrary from experience. Boogerking, you need to try harder.
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
Find me the evidence to support your claims about me trying/asking to get people banned and I'll reply to your CCC "argument."
reply to my CCC argument first, if you actually know more than me, then I'll waste my time doing the search on how you flame people.
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
You were claiming there is a performance hit despite everyone telling you to the contrary from experience. Boogerking, you need to try harder.
Originally posted by: Yourself
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
You were claiming there is a performance hit despite everyone telling you to the contrary from experience. Boogerking, you need to try harder.
Joker-
How do you not get banned with the constant name calling. Calling Ronin a "little girl" and calling him "boogerking", and countless others... that's just rediculous. You're actually pretty acurate with your facts, but your approach with which you present it comes across as petty.
Self
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
You were claiming there is a performance hit despite everyone telling you to the contrary from experience. Boogerking, you need to try harder.
performance hit by theory. Many people have switched to ATI tool, which is the right thing to do. I said impact performance, it does not mean "benchmark". Load time is going to be longer if you don't have too much memory(physical) to spare.
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: RobertR1
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
Find me the evidence to support your claims about me trying/asking to get people banned and I'll reply to your CCC "argument."
reply to my CCC argument first, if you actually know more than me, then I'll waste my time doing the search on how you flame people.
Doesn't work like that. You made the accusation that I tried to get people banned first. Now you're saying "flame" Do you even know the difference between the 2 words? or are you just changing your story as usual?
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: Yourself
Originally posted by: 5150Joker
Originally posted by: beggerking
Originally posted by: thilan29
Originally posted by: beggerking
stop accusing me of receiving free stuff, you damn accuser.
Just like here...RobertR1 DID NOT ACCUSE YOU OF receiving free stuff. I have no idea where you picked that out of.
looks like I did misread. my bad on that part.
its odd how RobertR1 brings up CCC stuff, and stopped commenting about it after I questioned his technical ability.
You were claiming there is a performance hit despite everyone telling you to the contrary from experience. Boogerking, you need to try harder.
Joker-
How do you not get banned with the constant name calling. Calling Ronin a "little girl" and calling him "boogerking", and countless others... that's just rediculous. You're actually pretty acurate with your facts, but your approach with which you present it comes across as petty.
Self
Self,
Well I only started addressing Ronin this way after the countless times he's resorted to vulgarities towards me. Just yesterday he called me a "dick" for exposing his nVidia affiliation. As for booger..err I mean beggerking, the guy just loves trolling. He accused RobertR1 in this thread of calling for people's ban and when pressed to provide evidence, he shifted his flames to something else - typical behavior of a troll.