Nvidia to license Kepler to everyone

Status
Not open for further replies.

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
Mobile Haswell aftershocks?

Nvidia said:
The IT world is being upended.

PC sales are declining with the rise of smartphones and tablets. High-definition screens are proliferating, showing up on most every machine. Android is increasingly pervasive. Yesterday’s PC industry, which produced several hundred million units a year, will soon become a computing-devices industry that produces many billions of units a year. And visual computing is at the epicenter of it all.

The consequences of these changes are apparent everywhere. New industry leaders are emerging. Companies differentiate not only on products but on business models. Some create systems from industry-standard chips. Others are vertically integrated and build their own chips, systems, software and even services. Some do both.

For chip-makers like NVIDIA that invent fundamental advances, this disruption provides an opening to expand our business model. Not so long ago, we only made and sold GPU chips, albeit the world’s fastest ones. Five years ago, we introduced Tegra, a system on a chip. More recently, GRID – a complete system that streams cloud games and other graphics-rich content – as well as the SHIELD gaming portable have been unveiled.

But it’s not practical to build silicon or systems to address every part of the expanding market. Adopting a new business approach will allow us to address the universe of devices.

So, our next step is to license our GPU cores and visual computing patent portfolio to device manufacturers to serve the needs of a large piece of the market.

The reality is that we’ve done this in the past. We licensed an earlier GPU core to Sony for the Playstation 3. And we receive more than $250 million a year from Intel as a license fee for our visual computing patents.

Now, the explosion of Android devices presents an unprecedented opportunity to accelerate this effort.



NVIDIA’s Kepler architecture is the world’s most advanced, most efficient GPU.

We’ll start by licensing the GPU core based on the NVIDIA Kepler architecture, the world’s most advanced, most efficient GPU. Its DX11, OpenGL 4.3, and GPGPU capabilities, along with vastly superior performance and efficiency, create a new class of licensable GPU cores. Through our efforts designing Tegra into mobile devices, we’ve gained valuable experience designing for the smallest power envelopes. As a result, Kepler can operate in a half-watt power envelope, making it scalable from smartphones to supercomputers.

Kepler is the basis for currently shipping GeForce, Quadro and Tesla GPUs, as well as our next-generation Tegra mobile processor codenamed Logan. Licensees will receive all necessary designs, collateral and support to integrate NVIDIA’s powerful graphics cores into their devices.

We’ll also offer licensing rights to our visual computing portfolio. This will enable licensees to develop their own GPU functionality while enjoying design freedom under the best visual computing patent portfolio in the world.

This opportunity simply didn’t exist several years ago because there was really just one computing device – the PC. But the swirling universe of new computing devices provides new opportunities to license our GPU core or visual computing portfolio.

As the world leader in visual computing technology, we believe we’re uniquely positioned to benefit. We invest more in R&D in this area than any other company in the world – over $1 billion annually and more than $6 billion since our founding. The vast majority of our 8,500 employees are engaged in these efforts, and we have more than 5,500 patents issued and pending – the industry’s best visual computing patent portfolio.

But more importantly, more devices will have the potential to take advantage of our investments. That means more of the planet’s users will be able to enjoy our advanced graphics technologies. And that’s what really gets us excited here at NVIDIA.

Since NVIDIA is licensing their GPU IP, this belongs in the GPU forum. On that note we already have a thread (or two) on it over there, so this is entirely redundant
-ViRGE
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Xpage

Senior member
Jun 22, 2005
459
15
81
www.riseofkingdoms.com
interesting, I suggested this for AMD/ATI a couple of years ago...

yeah but if they ever want to get into mobile they will have to screw their partners they licensed technology to by delaying releases of new tech so AMD ARM chips have an advantage, obviously not making them happy. Also i think giving them tech would allow for a quicker way to reverse engineer their GPU technology, as opposed for them to wait to buy a chip to start that.
 

mrmt

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2012
3,974
0
76
yeah but if they ever want to get into mobile they will have to screw their partners they licensed technology to by delaying releases of new tech so AMD ARM chips have an advantage, obviously not making them happy. Also i think giving them tech would allow for a quicker way to reverse engineer their GPU technology, as opposed for them to wait to buy a chip to start that.

AMD is bringing to the market a vanilla ARM core, they don't need to do much more to not give an advantage to their partners. They are already at the bottom of the performance ladder here.
 

sontin

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2011
3,273
149
106
What has Haswell to do with the licensing for mobile SoCs?! :confused:

nVidia want to make money from their R&D.
 

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
nVidia want to make money from their R&D.

By empowering their current competitors with their only advantage (that has now disappeared with the Adreno 330).

Tegra has failed, face it. Always too late, too power hungry, too low performing.
 

sontin

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2011
3,273
149
106
Lol. If you want to know what a "failure" is look at AMD's compute business. D:

There is no 330 on the market. Do people still take Qualcomm's reference plattform serious?!
 

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
There is no 330 on the market. Do people still take Qualcomm's reference plattform serious?!

Apparently Anandtech and ars technica do. After all, Qualcomm has a history of excellence in mobile. What does Nvidia have except a lack of design wins?


Snapdragon-800.0011.png


http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...on-800-benchmarked-sports-extremely-fast-gpu/

And FYI, S800 will be taking even more Tegra designs - http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-18/microsoft-said-to-add-qualcomm-as-surface-rt-supplier.html

Tegra 4 = stillborn.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,114
136
By empowering their current competitors with their only advantage (that has now disappeared with the Adreno 330).

Tegra has failed, face it. Always too late, too power hungry, too low performing.


That's what I was wondering when I read this. Has NV pretty much realized they have no market for Tegra?
 

SiliconWars

Platinum Member
Dec 29, 2012
2,346
0
0
Like AMD they can make a bit out of embedded/automotive where ultimate performance isn't so important. They just can't compete with Qualcomm at the money end in mobile.
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Tegra 4 isn't even using Kepler cores is it? I thought it was using pre G80 ie pre CUDA design, it's not even unified shader based is it?
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Didn't they decide Tegra 4 wasn't worth pushing and instead switched to ramping up Tegra 4i with the custom A9 cores?

Excuse my knowledge, I have very little on the subject phones and tablets don't really interest me.
 

sontin

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2011
3,273
149
106
Yap again. They delayed the tape-out by 3 months in favour for Tegra 4i and Logan.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,386
15,758
136
And that is what competition brings to the table.. for consumers anyway, happy days :)
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
Well considering the comments Nvidia made about not having the workforce to take on too many projects (like the next consoles), and the fact that Kepler is the end of the Fermi based uarch, it would make sense if they can't push these out and are still working on dated tech to get their name out there to make some money/mindshare. While continuing to focus on their new uarch Maxwell which the CEO has been very vocal about being vastly superior to Kepler from a perf/w standpoint.

Their bread and butter is workstation HPC, Intel is trying to move in on them after AMD failed to penetrate the market. However Intel is vastly out gunning Nvidia so I think this is more a move to continue making profits in this sector while refocusing limited capabilities on a more imminent threat.
 
Last edited:

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,386
15,758
136
Hypothetical, how massive a dominance, in multiple markets, would Intel have to get to get the attention of FTC(?) .. while not there yet, it seems like Intel is moving in on everyone and everything in the processor business from server to workstation to laptop to tablet to mobile to graphics to process capability .. And if successfull? .. just wondering
 
Mar 10, 2006
11,715
2,012
126
Lol. If you want to know what a "failure" is look at AMD's compute business. D:

There is no 330 on the market. Do people still take Qualcomm's reference plattform serious?!

This is true. 330 is not yet in devices we can buy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.