Nvidia?s long-awaited NV18 and NV28 graphics chips will finally be launched worldwide on September 25, formally leading the company into the AGP 8x market.
Don't worry about it. UT2004 beats GF4's senseless too.UT2003 is beating my GF3 senseless
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
This is better news, IMO:
Facing the new competition from Nvidia, especially in the medium-range market, ATI Technologies announced that in October it will introduce its Radeon 9500 series, a simpler version of its top-end Radeon 9700 PRO. Though based on the R300 core and offering the AGP 8x specification, the Radeon 9500 series (Radeon 9500 and Radeon 9500 PRO) is designed with four pipelines and DirectX 8.1 support.
The Radeon 9500 PRO and 9500 are quoted at US$219 and US$179, respectively. ATI started small-scale shipments to its card-manufacturing partners lately. Full-scale production will begin next month.
Edit: But why strip DX9 support?
Originally posted by: Sunner
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
This is better news, IMO:
Facing the new competition from Nvidia, especially in the medium-range market, ATI Technologies announced that in October it will introduce its Radeon 9500 series, a simpler version of its top-end Radeon 9700 PRO. Though based on the R300 core and offering the AGP 8x specification, the Radeon 9500 series (Radeon 9500 and Radeon 9500 PRO) is designed with four pipelines and DirectX 8.1 support.
The Radeon 9500 PRO and 9500 are quoted at US$219 and US$179, respectively. ATI started small-scale shipments to its card-manufacturing partners lately. Full-scale production will begin next month.
Edit: But why strip DX9 support?
Is it just me, or does that sound like an upgraded 9000?
Almost like the MX line, GF2/GF4 bastardized cards, sounds like this will be a R200/R300 bastard.
Why did ATi have to follow in nVidias footsteps with their lame naming scheme, what's wrong with the first digit representing DX version, and the following numbers essentially representing performance class? 🙁
lucky me then having a Radeon 9700 and running it with 4x fsaa and everything maxed 😉Originally posted by: Dug
Don't worry about it. UT2004 beats GF4's senseless too.UT2003 is beating my GF3 senseless
Originally posted by: Dug
Don't worry about it. UT2004 beats GF4's senseless too.UT2003 is beating my GF3 senseless
Originally posted by: Czar
lucky me then having a Radeon 9700 and running it with 4x fsaa and everything maxed 😉Originally posted by: Dug
Don't worry about it. UT2004 beats GF4's senseless too.UT2003 is beating my GF3 senseless
Originally posted by: Aquaman
The question is will the new cards have problems with 8X AGP ?
Cheers,
Aquaman
Originally posted by: Sunner
Why did ATi have to follow in nVidias footsteps with their lame naming scheme, what's wrong with the first digit representing DX version, and the following numbers essentially representing performance class? 🙁
Have you noticed that there is generally a Jack-in-the-Box or Burger King across the street from most MacDonalds? 😉
Success is imitated (the most sincere form of flattery).
😀
WHO CARES? What about the NV30? 😉Nvidia to launch NV18 and NV28 chips on September 25
😀