nVidia schedules an event on the same day as ATI's Evergreen launch?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Originally posted by: Idontcare

To cry foul or unfair when NV or Intel does it is betraying your own prejudice and bias regarding your favorite cpu/gpu maker, it doesn't really change the fact these guys are doing what their shareholders and employees expect them to do as a matter of effecting their fiduciary responsibilities.

Totally agree! Also think to excuse any marketing ploy by saying "the other guy does it" - also betrays your prejudice.

 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
Originally posted by: ronnn
Originally posted by: Idontcare

To cry foul or unfair when NV or Intel does it is betraying your own prejudice and bias regarding your favorite cpu/gpu maker, it doesn't really change the fact these guys are doing what their shareholders and employees expect them to do as a matter of effecting their fiduciary responsibilities.

Totally agree! Also think to excuse any marketing ploy by saying "the other guy does it" - also betrays your prejudice.

But the problem (why it's considered a problem, I do not know) is that "the other guy" whichever side of the fence your sitting on, does do it, and will continue to do it at any chance and opportunity that presents itself.

Question: Who is upset that Nvidia scheduled an event on the same day as AMD's event?
All those who raised their hands, go out back, break a branch off of a tree, and have your friend beat you with it. ;)
Now that would be a reason to be upset. hehe. :D

 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
I have no problem with a nvidia event. I do have problems with nvidia's claims at these events and their past viral ways of killing sales until they have a card out.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: nemesismk2
ATI's launch in September is going to be very interesting and might raise questions about Nvidia's ability to compete against ATI's DX11 video cards. I hope Nvidia can compete or there will be no reason for ATI to keep the prices down which as a consumer will be bad. :(

How does this raise the question? The simple act of ATI releasing a card raises the question of whether or not Nvidia can compete against DX11? I don't get it.

It's just a bit worrying that Nvidia has gone so far befind ATI that they have not even released a video card using DX10.1 yet and seem so far off releasing DX11. I want a choice for a DX11 video card between Nvidia and ATI not just ATI.

Considering Nvidia's DX11 hardware is supposedly a completely new arch (MIMD), and AMD's is supposedly not (just more shaders, ROPs TUs), I think "being far behind" is a matter of subjectiveness.

I had not heard that, that could end up making a major difference. They could be 6 months behind but obliterate amd in performance and still come out ok as long as they kept people informed of just how incredibly badass gt300 was going to be. As hauk mentioned, many of us "could" wait if we wanted to badly enough. What I fear is an nvidia press event that is short on info and long on bs, what I EXPECT is for nvidia to reveal some badass new technology that will wrong-foot amd's launch a bit. New product launches are always very interesting...

 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Creig
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Exactly what release date was there that was deliberately changed? Did we have an official release date? Do we now?

Anyway: BryanW1995: "They're just following good business protocol and attempting to rain on the other guy's parade, hoping that they can convince their loyalists (of whom there are many) to wait "just a little bit longer". AMD tried this with 2900xt and alienated much of their hard-earned fanbase in the process.
"

We are talking about stealing another company's thunder. Don't restrict it to just changing a launch date. There are announcements, paper launches, delays, dates pushed back, etc.

The 2900XT (R600) was delayed multiple times due to design issues before it actually launched. But I don't recall any of the dates being set to coincide with a pre-planned Nvidia launch date and am unable to find any links affirming that what BrywanW1995 and AmdInside said is true.

What??? Are you claiming that ati was absolutely silent for 6 months after 8800gtx launched? Are you out of your mind? They might not be as sneaky (and effective) as nvidia's marketing dept, ati's marketing dept was also tasked with ensuring that they sold as many video cards as possible. Do you mean to tell us that amd would have just sat back and allowed 8800gtx/s to take over the entire mid/upper range without saying a word??? If so, no wonder they were bought out, they were all idiots. Please don't take this the wrong way, but WE would have to be idiots to think that ati did nothing to rain on nvidia's parade. I'm not saying that it's nice, or pretty, or "fair", but this is (graphics) war; it would be suicidal for either side to refrain from using any legal tactic that they believe to be of benefit to them or a hindrance to the other side.
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Idontcare
Originally posted by: OCguy
Well, yea. You dont want the kid from the Newegg warehouse putting up a review before the techsites. Although that would be funny.

That's how sorta how Thomas Pabst and Anand Lal Shimpi got started :D

Originally posted by: Qbah
I would find it strange if nVidia would be sitting and doing absolutely nothing to at least put a small dent in ATi's new launch.

Not to mention NV's shareholders. I'd question the leadership if the decision was made to ignore or refrain from doing anything to stifle ATI's attempt to generate hype (and what else would you call the Sept 10 mtg?) surrounding there nex-gen product lineup.

This isn't a business tactic invented by Nvidia, or Intel for that matter, this approach runs just as deep and long as the very hype-generating events themselves have been around. Across many industries, not just semiconductor.

Guess what, my local Ford dealership is having a "blow-out savings labor day weekend sale" this weekend, and wouldn't you know it but the gosh-darned Toyota dealership went and tried to steal the Ford dealership's thunder by announcing their own labor-day sales event after the Ford dealership had already announced their weekend plans.

It happens, these are called "best practices" and they are taught and learned by management in all walks of business and industry.

To cry foul or unfair when NV or Intel does it is betraying your own prejudice and bias regarding your favorite cpu/gpu maker, it doesn't really change the fact these guys are doing what their shareholders and employees expect them to do as a matter of effecting their fiduciary responsibilities.

you had me until you mentioned that toyota was trying to steal ford's thunder. maybe nissan or honda... ;)
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
So was the outrage in this thread pretty much for nothing? I didnt see a launch.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Originally posted by: OCguy
So was the outrage in this thread pretty much for nothing? I didnt see a launch.

I didn't see much in the way of outrage... I wanted to know if either of these companies would have anything meaningful to talk about or show. AMD showed working 58x0 cards running 6 monitors at once and talked about their upcoming cards it looks like. Does anyone know what Nvidia displayed or talked about to the press?
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Originally posted by: OCguy
So was the outrage in this thread pretty much for nothing? I didnt see a launch.

I didn't see much in the way of outrage... I wanted to know if either of these companies would have anything meaningful to talk about or show. AMD showed working 58x0 cards running 6 monitors at once and talked about their upcoming cards it looks like. Does anyone know what Nvidia displayed or talked about to the press?

I am interested in this too. Does anyone know?

Originally posted by: thilan29
Where are the benchmarks!!!! :|


Yea, 6 monitors is nice and all, but will never benefit me or most other people. Maybe the benchmarks are going to be on the later September date? Maybe tomorrow?
 

Hauk

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2001
2,806
0
0
San Diego, pacific time, ATI's event in the evening maybe? Maybe AT and others are on hold until at least then? Maybe nV info to follow?
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
this is just the pre-launch launch. The REAL launch will be sept 24. We'll get benchmarks on oct 3, and on oct 5 three lucky winners will win a powercolor 5870 (that they will actually receive on jan 31, 2010). This is the crap that happens when team A comes early to the table and knows that team B is so far behind that they can lollygag around with their launch.

Anything is better than this, even the dreaded paper launch!
 

Hauk

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2001
2,806
0
0
Yea I just had a chance to read the stories, doubtful their gonna wrap up with specs and benchies. Suddenly my 40" 1080P looks, small.. :)
 

ilkhan

Golden Member
Jul 21, 2006
1,117
1
0
So still no specs, and I dont want a SLS display (I want my windows to maximize per display, damnit).
Much ado about nothing.
 

Kakkoii

Senior member
Jun 5, 2009
379
0
0
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
this is just the pre-launch launch. The REAL launch will be sept 24. We'll get benchmarks on oct 3, and on oct 5 three lucky winners will win a powercolor 5870 (that they will actually receive on jan 31, 2010). This is the crap that happens when team A comes early to the table and knows that team B is so far behind that they can lollygag around with their launch.

Anything is better than this, even the dreaded paper launch!

Well it looks like it's actually going to be a 5850. Since the early ad's for the contest states a $299 card..
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,002
126
Originally posted by: OCguy
www.neveraccurate.com?

We should start a tally on what Semiaccurate.com has stated so far for the upcoming AMD and Nvidia parts and see what they get right, what they were in the ball park on, and what they weren't even close on.

I'm not sure if they were the ones who stated that AMD's part would have the 1600/80/32 specs or not? I know they stated that Nvidia would be months behind AMD in releasing their new cards. Anything else? I'd like to see how accurate they are or aren't.

I remember Charlie stated that the GTX295 was going to be made in very small quanitities or killed off all together because it was a part created just to win the 'halo' benchmarks and was losing money. Clearly he was wrong about that, but in his defense the sandwich card was killed off and the part was redesigned.

We should make a list and see how accurate (or not accurate) he ends up being after ther dust settles.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,219
55
91
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Originally posted by: OCguy
www.neveraccurate.com?

We should start a tally on what Semiaccurate.com has stated so far for the upcoming AMD and Nvidia parts and see what they get right, what they were in the ball park on, and what they weren't even close on.

I'm not sure if they were the ones who stated that AMD's part would have the 1600/80/32 specs or not? I know they stated that Nvidia would be months behind AMD in releasing their new cards. Anything else? I'd like to see how accurate they are or aren't.

I remember Charlie stated that the GTX295 was going to be made in very small quanitities or killed off all together because it was a part created just to win the 'halo' benchmarks and was losing money. Clearly he was wrong about that, but in his defense the sandwich card was killed off and the part was redesigned.

We should make a list and see how accurate (or not accurate) he ends up being after ther dust settles.

I wouldn't bother with that. The less site hits they get, the less advertising they will get, and then maybe eventually, it'll go away. Plenty of other reputable sites to visit for information.

 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
Originally posted by: SlowSpyder
Originally posted by: OCguy
www.neveraccurate.com?

We should start a tally on what Semiaccurate.com has stated so far for the upcoming AMD and Nvidia parts and see what they get right, what they were in the ball park on, and what they weren't even close on.

I'm not sure if they were the ones who stated that AMD's part would have the 1600/80/32 specs or not? I know they stated that Nvidia would be months behind AMD in releasing their new cards. Anything else? I'd like to see how accurate they are or aren't.

I remember Charlie stated that the GTX295 was going to be made in very small quanitities or killed off all together because it was a part created just to win the 'halo' benchmarks and was losing money. Clearly he was wrong about that, but in his defense the sandwich card was killed off and the part was redesigned.

We should make a list and see how accurate (or not accurate) he ends up being after ther dust settles.

I wouldn't bother with that. The less site hits they get, the less advertising they will get, and then maybe eventually, it'll go away. Plenty of other reputable sites to visit for information.

sadly, I think that their website says it all. They're just, um, semi-accurate.

iirc chiphell announced the 1600/80/32 a month ago. they get a lot of info there.
 

imported_Shaq

Senior member
Sep 24, 2004
731
0
0
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
this is just the pre-launch launch. The REAL launch will be sept 24. We'll get benchmarks on oct 3, and on oct 5 three lucky winners will win a powercolor 5870 (that they will actually receive on jan 31, 2010). This is the crap that happens when team A comes early to the table and knows that team B is so far behind that they can lollygag around with their launch.

Anything is better than this, even the dreaded paper launch!

So yesterday was the pre-pre-launch, the 24th is the pre-launch and Oct. 3rd is launch? Or is Oct. 22 the launch? Or maybe Oct 22 is retail availability. How about less marketing and more substance! It was so great the last two years when they launched the day the NDA expired. Since AMD is the first to bring paper launches back, or whatever this is called, Nvidia will probably start doing it again. *sigh*
 

bryanW1995

Lifer
May 22, 2007
11,144
32
91
it's not a paper launch until they say "launch date is X" and when X arrives there are none to be found. Yesterday was not "launch", it was the pre-launch NAVAL BATTLE BIG EVENT. If the japanese had invaded they would have been ready, if santa clara had invaded they would have been screwed.

While we're on the subject, there is enough hype around 5xxx that they will probably be in short supply for a while after launch. The problem with this is that it's hard to tell if it's a "paper" launch or if there are just too many people snapping up the tens of thousands of units that were just waiting to be bought.

My understanding is that nda lifts around sept 24 and they go on sale that day. Is that correct?