- Jul 27, 2002
- 13,329
- 709
- 126
akugami: I wasn't in a hating mood of any sort. If my post sounded as such, I'd like to clarify in that regard. I was rather amused at the article when I wrote about it above.
Said that, sugar-coating over something exceedingly obvious isn't one of my best abilities. I'll give you that.
Said that, sugar-coating over something exceedingly obvious isn't one of my best abilities. I'll give you that.
Sylvanas
Diamond Member
- Jan 20, 2004
- 3,752
- 0
- 0
WTF is this? I can already use an extra GPU as a PhysX card in any PCI-E 2.0 motherboard with a full length slot- why do I need a logo to tell me I can do that? Are they going to start rebadging every X58 / 790FX / GX board that it is also 'PhysX capable' too....Sounds more like marketing and an extra license the vendor has to pay NV money for to stick the logo on their P55 boards.
akugami
Diamond Member
- Feb 14, 2005
- 6,210
- 2,552
- 136
Originally posted by: lopri
akugami: I wasn't in a hating mood of any sort. If my post sounded as such, I'd like to clarify in that regard. I was rather amused at the article when I wrote about it above.
Said that, sugar-coating over something exceedingly obvious isn't one of my best abilities. I'll give you that.
Yeah, I was amused at the article myself. I just don't see much going on here aside from marketing.
I'm very puzzled and I'm wondering if this is the "big announcement" hinted at last week or the week before (read it on xbitlabs.com). Or maybe the fact that they're still developing chipsets for Nehalem/Westmere (as noted elsewhere in the news) even though they have no license to do so. If the big announcement is essentially a marketing move, then that's a big let down. If the big announcement is the fact that they're continuing chipset development then that's really not a surprise since they'll likely get a license eventually, once Intel and nVidia hashes out the exact terms of the cross licensing agreement to end their lawsuits against each other.
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
C'mon dude. You know that's not what this thread is about. You want to talk about Intel,......
Please dont.
Geezzz, I've heard of spin being put on things, but this takes the cake.
From what the marketing blurb put out by nvidia with the Power of 3, two parts were made by Intel, so how is it irrelevant to ignore Intel in the equation or discussion of this? Only talk about nvidia when it's one part of the Power of 3? Sounds like you want 1/3 to be greater than the other 2/3.......
Funny. But what else can one expect from a dyed-in-the-wool fanboi.
Keysplayr
Elite Member
- Jan 16, 2003
- 21,219
- 56
- 91
Originally posted by: Beanie46
Originally posted by: Keysplayr
C'mon dude. You know that's not what this thread is about. You want to talk about Intel,......
Please dont.
Geezzz, I've heard of spin being put on things, but this takes the cake.
From what the marketing blurb put out by nvidia with the Power of 3, two parts were made by Intel, so how is it irrelevant to ignore Intel in the equation or discussion of this? Only talk about nvidia when it's one part of the Power of 3? Sounds like you want 1/3 to be greater than the other 2/3.......
Funny. But what else can one expect from a dyed-in-the-wool fanboi.
Please. You don't have any idea where that conversation was going to go. I kind of do.
So here's a big, "Yeah OK", to you.
FalseChristian
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2002
- 3,322
- 0
- 71
Ich habe fielen die PhysX-Schleife nicht zu lang, nachdem ich meine ASUS PhysX P1-Karte gekauft. Nicht wirklich beachten viel Leistung Gaming in UT3. Ich hatte es kombiniert mit einer ATI-4870... Seitdem habe ich die Karte genommen, aus. Ist diese Karte noch Wert am zu sein?
Did anyone catch that it was only a x4 slot? It's possible x1 would be enough. I had a 9600GT with a x1 adapter but never could get it to work but now I know why as it isn't so simple to configure with SLI. Too bad I don't have it to test anymore. Oh well I have PhysX working with my 260 and 295 now. lol
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
- Nov 26, 2005
- 15,197
- 403
- 126
WTF that is now that the hell i said
EDIT: yep, opps
try 2: WTF, that is not what the hell I said
I have (fielen is nonsensical in this sentence) the PhysX-Bow not too long, after I mine Asus PhysX P1-Card bought. Not really consider many capability gaming in UT3. I combined it with a ATI-4870....Since then I took the card, out. Is this card still worth on to be.
Heh, may want to brush up on your German a bit
No, I couldn't translate that, my wife was born and raised in Germany, she said that gave her a headache to translate She couldn't figure out your tense useage or anything, you bought a PhysX card after your PhysX card?
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
- Nov 26, 2005
- 15,197
- 403
- 126
BTRY B 529th FA BN
Lifer
- Nov 26, 2005
- 15,197
- 403
- 126
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter