• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

NVIDIA Pascal Thread

Page 176 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
http://www.geforce.com/

RrcyYsa.png


Nvidia just made it official thanks to peeking at the site's source code.
 
I'm wondering how much of the shader gap will be able to be closed by higher clocks when both cards are pushed. Is it expected that custom AIB 1080tis will be able to OC higher than TXP (assuming both are water cooled)? I'm happy to keep my TXP as long as it actually retains the performance crown.
 
pj- said:
I'm wondering how much of the shader gap will be able to be closed by higher clocks when both cards are pushed. Is it expected that custom AIB 1080tis will be able to OC higher than TXP (assuming both are water cooled)? I'm happy to keep my TXP as long as it actually retains the performance crown.
Click to expand...

Nvidia Pascal tops out at about 2.1 GHz regardless of cooling: gap will likely not be closed.
 
pj- said:
I'm wondering how much of the shader gap will be able to be closed by higher clocks when both cards are pushed. Is it expected that custom AIB 1080tis will be able to OC higher than TXP (assuming both are water cooled)? I'm happy to keep my TXP as long as it actually retains the performance crown.
Click to expand...

If both are water cooled and maxed out, Titan XP will remain 5-10% faster. The gap will be slightly closer than the percentage difference in core count due to the 1080 TI having the same memory bandwidth.
 
Grooveriding said:
Meh. I think it's going to go over like a lead balloon unless they price it no more than $649.
Click to expand...

I don't see that happening unless NV lowers the price of the GTX 1080 - and why would they do that? Vega is probably going to be somewhere in the 1070-1080 range, unless AMD has been sandbagging.
 
The 1080 is now 1 year old, so it would be fairly normal for them to lower the price on it. A lot of the people who'd buy at the current price already have done.

They didn't do it (much?) with Maxwell though so maybe it depends a bit on when Volta is going to ready.
 
They lowered the price of the 980 by 50$. I would expect the same or maybe even 100$ now with the 1080 for the TI launch.But still 1080Ti won't launch for 650$. Cheapest i could imagine would be 699/799 (Custom/FE). Look at the prize of the 1080 at newegg. Quite a few already selling lower than the official 599$ prize.
 
Qwertilot said:
The 1080 is now 1 year old, so it would be fairly normal for them to lower the price on it. A lot of the people who'd buy at the current price already have done.

They didn't do it (much?) with Maxwell though so maybe it depends a bit on when Volta is going to ready.
Click to expand...

I've noticed some of the larger AIBs coming out with new GTX 1080 models. I started to wonder if the 1080 Ti was delayed, but apparently not. I hope the whole stack will go down in price, but we'll see.
 
Just a few hours till the announcement. This must be one of the best kept secrets from NVIDIA in a while, unless last year's specifications turn out to be true. Last stop for enthusiasts before Volta, expected to be a significant change. 🙂
 
Sweepr said:
Just a few hours till the announcement. This must be one of the best kept secrets from NVIDIA in a while, unless last year's specifications turn out to be true. Last stop for enthusiasts before Volta, expected to be a significant change. 🙂
Click to expand...

Competition is as bad, if not worse, than when 8800 GTX ruled the roost. AMD has been 100% absent from the high end for a year now, Nvidia has been sandbagging GP102 for nearly that long as well, and is just now FINALLY releasing a "Geforce" version of the chip with 15% of it's cores fused off. So sad. I hope the upcoming chip that cannot be named in this sub-forum can compete, at least with aggressive pricing. I'm sick of seeing price and performance stagnation.
 
tviceman said:
Competition is as bad, if not worse, than when 8800 GTX ruled the roost. AMD has been 100% absent from the high end for a year now, Nvidia has been sandbagging GP102 for nearly that long as well, and is just now FINALLY releasing a "Geforce" version of the chip with 15% of it's cores fused off. So sad. I hope the upcoming chip that cannot be named in this sub-forum can compete, at least with aggressive pricing. I'm sick of seeing price and performance stagnation.
Click to expand...

Could you please provide me with a link to the number of cores in the GPU you're bashing?
 
Arachnotronic said:
Could you please provide me with a link to the number of cores in the GPU you're bashing?
Click to expand...

Give me about two hours and I'll give you all the specs. 😀 I'd love to be pleasantly surprised, but I think the rumors of the 3,328 cores will turn out accurate. The only way it doesn't is if Vega will prove to be a serious competitor to a potential full-functioning GP102.
 
It will be -256Sp from TITANXP(so 3328sp) or full 3840SP SKU.Either way yes AMD is worse now than in 8800 GTX time.
They focused on Ryzen last 4years and we can hope ryzen will be big win and they start again send some money to GPU division.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top