• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Nvidia GTX Titan X Owners Benchmark Thread

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Keysplayer, your Titan X is a TRULY powerful card. I just ran the Heaven benchmark with the same settings stock with my TWO R9 290s in CF in the rig below and here's the score:
whhagx.jpg
 
Last edited:
Keysplayer, your Titan X is a TRULY powerful card. I just ran the Heaven benchmark with the same settings stock with my TWO R9 290s in CF in the rig below and here's the score:
whhagx.jpg

Dang man. Are you saying your 290's were stock clocks though ?
 
Noice!! Umm did you say if you were overclocking your memory as well? Or are you leaving memory stock and just o/c'ing the GPU?
 
Hmmmf. Going to try it. I didn't do anything with the memory yet. Lets see how close I can get to ya!! 😉

Ok. 1378 on GPU and +250MHz on VRAM. 1920x1080


I broke 4000points. I'll try a little more on the memory. Did you do +250 (500MHz theoretical DDR) or a full +500 in your overclocking utility?
 
Last edited:
Hmmmf. Going to try it. I didn't do anything with the memory yet. Lets see how close I can get to ya!! 😉

Ok. 1378 on GPU and +250MHz on VRAM. 1920x1080


I broke 4000points. I'll try a little more on the memory. Did you do +250 (500MHz theoretical DDR) or a full +500 in your overclocking utility?

+500 MHz in the utility, so I guess an actual 1Ghz bump wow.
 
The trouble I have with making the switch is that I'm not convinced that Titan X is it for maxwell on the highend. They must be holding something back. I got duped with Kepler with a 680, titan, 780's, and ti's all cause I was impatient. As long as Nvidia holds back a fp64 monster my Z is going to hold good value. It's almost like an exciting game of Russian roulette.
 
I was wrong, I'm at +580Mhz on the memory, so that's what ? 1.160 Ghz overclock ? Looking around the web at reviews, I'm thinking I got a bit of a golden piece of silicon with this here chip 😀

It's weird, Techspot's review said they couldn't get much out of the memory and left it at stock.
 
Last edited:
I bet I could sell my Z on eBay, buy a Titan X and pocket some money. What would you guys do?

I'd probably sell the Z while you could get the most bucks, and move towards a Titan X. It's the full GM200 silicon. All SM's enabled. Because if Nvidia DOES come out with an FP64 monster, your Z will drop in value fairly quickly.
Just my opinion.
 
At 1300MHz or above I have to have the fan at around 60-65% to maintain temps around 82-84C. It's pretty loud but maybe my case airflow isn't the greatest.

Interesting. At almost 1400MHz, this GPU wants to keep the temps in the same area you described, but the fan never gets over 50%. I have pretty good case airflow though.
 
Hmmmf. Going to try it. I didn't do anything with the memory yet. Lets see how close I can get to ya!! 😉

Weird to say, but you will be slightly hamstrung by your platform. As well as the i7-2600k (especially overclocked) stands on it's own, PCIe 2.0 will cut you down a few percentage points. UPGRADE dat CPU! 😀 (more like side grade but you know what I mean)
 
Last edited:
Yes that score is stock Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290s under water. core 1000/mem 1300

Now here is the score with core at 1100/mem 1400
1r5l4p.jpg

It's crazy to see Titan X OC'd essentially matching ( <= 3%) a stock R9 295x2 in BF4, Crysis 3, and Shadows Of Mordor in Anandtech's review. It falls behind a bit in Talos Principle and even more so in Attila, but still, that is some serious, serious horsepower. And here I am still thinking Titan X is a bit of a mixed bag!
 
Back
Top