Right, but in current games the difference is not that much, esp in half life 2. So I guess my point is... would it be better to have dual 6800GT's now and not upgrade for 4 years, or to have a X850XT PE now and upgrade when the r620's/NV60's start showing up?
its already been posted, you need a card that supports SLI, this generation doesn't so you can't do this.
RussianSensation
Elite Member
- Sep 5, 2003
- 19,458
- 765
- 126
Neither of these options. I would get 6800GT right now for $370. In 1 year another mid-high end card with price performance of 6800GT for $370. Then another card in 1 year from before for $370 again. This runs you $1110 but every single year you'll have a very fast graphics card as opposed to having the best setup today with dual sli, slower setup when R500/NV50 come out and even slower in 3rd year and 4th. If you buy DualSLI right now you are spending $200-300 on a mobo + $500 on a videocard a piece. R620 or whatever you want to call it will cost $500. Thats 1300 + 500 = $1800. The problem is out of those 4 years, the SLI setup will only be good for first 2. In 2 years, midrange cards will be faster, not even talking about high-end ones. That is why unless you can afford to drop $1000 on graphics cards every 1 year, it's always better to upgrade using the card that gives you 70-80% performance that year so that eventually that strategy will outgrow the "dropping down massive cash on the best hardware today, hoping it'll last you 4 years."
This applies for CPUs too. Someone who spent $800 on FX55 and keeps it for 3 years vs. Someone who buys a64 3200+ for $200 today, A64 4500 + for $200 1 year from now, A64 5300+ for $200 2 years from now, and so on...eventually the person with teh slower component in year 1 will catch up while retaining all the new features that new components bring.
In this case buying a card and not upgrading for 4 years is not a wise option since you wont be able to experience longhorn's DX10 interface either.
But what is important to you? Knowing you have the fastest computer out of your friends for 1.5 years and a slow one for next 2.5 years or having a good machine for all 4 years, but not the best one out there?
Yea, thing is 6800GT is same price as a X850XT PE right now...
And since I have to have a computer by January... so I figure I'll have $500 to start off, save a bit more, then I can upgrade in 2 years to the next big video card and a $200 processor. Then the next big update will be in four years, with a new MB and etc.
And since I have to have a computer by January... so I figure I'll have $500 to start off, save a bit more, then I can upgrade in 2 years to the next big video card and a $200 processor. Then the next big update will be in four years, with a new MB and etc.
get an SLI motherboard and a single SLI 6800GT. when its not enough in the future, and GTs cost half what they cost now, get another and add another 80% to your performance.
IAteYourMother
Lifer
- Nov 3, 2004
- 10,491
- 22
- 81
If you are basing this on how the 6800GT are way over MSRP right now what makes you think the X850 will be at MSRP. I personally believe it will be at like 700-800 at first.
uOpt
Golden Member
- Oct 19, 2004
- 1,628
- 0
- 0
When did they implement fog tables in Direct3D (it works in OpenGL and Rave)?
When did they repair DirectDraw (look up "Armored Task Force" and "ATI" to see people disable hardware support for 2D acceleration)?
Why do they only have alibi drivers for Linux and none for FreeBSD? Granted, they don't have to do more, but arguably NVidia's support is better, which is the original claim.
Why does my tri-head setup with AGP and PCI cards not allow a restart of the grahics subsystem when the AGP card is an ATI one (require reboot to get it back in line)? It works fine with a NVidia AGP card.
Why do they still do deceptive marketing (in this case sneaking on cards with half the memory width under the same designations that full cards are written reviews about)?
This is easy,
If you are going to get a single card and want it right now. The ATI cards devilver more realworld power that Nvidia.
If you want to throwdown some serious cash, go Nvidia. The SLI will rule ass and Nvidia currently has the most high tech GPU with Pixel Shader 3.0, but to beat the ATI you need the SLI kicking in your game.
I love competition,
Happy Times!
If you are going to get a single card and want it right now. The ATI cards devilver more realworld power that Nvidia.
If you want to throwdown some serious cash, go Nvidia. The SLI will rule ass and Nvidia currently has the most high tech GPU with Pixel Shader 3.0, but to beat the ATI you need the SLI kicking in your game.
I love competition,
Happy Times!
Googer
Lifer
- Nov 11, 2004
- 12,576
- 7
- 81
SLI offers hit and miss performance it works in some games and not for others. The ones it does work for the performance gained is 10-25% and you certainly are not getting what you paid for in the respect of price to performance. Here is the kicker: some games when run with SLI are slower than a single graphics card.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter