While NVidia spends a lot on marketing, as a percentage of revenue, it's not so much.
How about giving $100 billion to OpenAI, to be their "preferred partner" for hardware purchases?
While NVidia spends a lot on marketing, as a percentage of revenue, it's not so much.
How about giving $100 billion to OpenAI, to be their "preferred partner" for hardware purchases?
In practice it is a 25% discount on Nvidia's GPU price to openAiHow about giving $100 billion to OpenAI, to be their "preferred partner" for hardware purchases?
Haha yeah. That was more to prolong the AI Bubble than anything else.
OpenAI is so going to IPO too, and people will eat it up. nVidia might not even lose money on the investment. That's probably right before the bubble pops.
I
In practice it is a 25% discount on Nvidia's GPU price to openAi
This should limit openAI sales to Broadcom & AMD
AMD is the biggest loser of recent Nvidia "deals"
If it's something that AMD knows, it's LAYERS. They certainly sell enough X3D chips these days to be experts in the field...Both smell of anti-competitive moves by a monopolist.
AMD needs to get its layers ready.
If it's something that AMD knows, it's LAYERS. They certainly sell enough X3D chips these days to be experts in the field...
I think in reality, what's happening or will happen is OpenAI buys Nvidia GPUs using cash. This was going to be the case no matter what.In practice it is a 25% discount on Nvidia's GPU price to openAi
This should limit openAI sales to Broadcom & AMD
AMD is the biggest loser of recent Nvidia "deals"
Nvidia takes the profit from selling GPUs to OpenAI and buys/invests it into OpenAI stock, which is not publicly traded.
Haha yeah. That was more to prolong the AI Bubble than anything else.
OpenAI is so going to IPO too, and people will eat it up. nVidia might not even lose money on the investment. That's probably right before the bubble pops.
Is your stance that Nvidia does not spend money on advertising and market development? Everything we know about them points to massive spending for both advertising and market adoption.
Nvidia is a household name now, but that's largely due to the AI boom.Nvidia doesn't spend money on advertising their brand to consumers to make it a household name like Intel's was and probably still is. There is no "Nvidia inside" advertising campaign, or payments to OEMs for exclusivity like Intel's deal with Dell that made them Intel only for nearly two decades. That's what I was not talking about, not ordinary advertising of products.
Yeah they're really good at marketing and shipping halo configs consistently.Before that, Nvidia was just one of the many tech companies out there, but amongst the markets where Nvidia competes in, they definitely spend a ton of resources on marketing and promotion. "The Way Its Meant to Be Played", "RTX: ON", etc are all Nvidia marketing campaigns.
Basically. JHH/Nvidia have a major hard-on for the "if you're not first, you're last" philosophy. That and "never admit fault".Yeah they're really good at marketing and shipping halo configs consistently.
So does Lisa.JHH/Nvidia have a major hard-on for the "if you're not first, you're last" philosophy
I don't get that impression from Lisa. She doesn't appear to be as cutthroat and willing to throw partners under the bus as JHH.So does Lisa.
Just not in...
...graphics.
"Leadership %stuff%" is quite literally her catchphrase.I don't get that impression from Lisa
Indeed, ego trips at AMD are outsourced to Senior Fellows.She doesn't appear to be as cutthroat and willing to throw partners under the bus as JHH.
There is a continuous "Nvidia inside" campaign, it's just not advertised as such. In the past they even had the traditional type too:Nvidia doesn't spend money on advertising their brand to consumers to make it a household name like Intel's was and probably still is. There is no "Nvidia inside" advertising campaign
They sure did try!or payments to OEMs for exclusivity
ngl, a much smarter use of marketing than Intel ever did.There is a continuous "Nvidia inside" campaign, it's just not advertised as such. In the past they even had the traditional type too:
Nowadays they have a more refined approach, surely you've seen their "RTX On - RTX Off" videos or the more aggressive "advertorials" such as this:
View attachment 130833
They sure did try!
Over the years, Nvidia pushed a lot of senior engineering hours into supporting game developers. This was discussed extensively on the forum and other places.The same happened in the education sector, they made sure students and teachers have a paved way towards adopting CUDA. Students became engineers. Nvidia spent their market adoption money wisely, but they did spend quite a bit for both gaming and compute.
I would not underestimate the financial effort Nvida undertook to build their brand among consumers and professionals in the past two decades.
Instead of marketing, they should be paying for power generation. The AI boom is likely to go bust because they run out of power to build new data centers.
Musk found the loophole to solve all datacenter power requirements:Instead of marketing, they should be paying for power generation. The AI boom is likely to go bust because they run out of power to build new data centers.
Musk found the loophole to solve all datacenter power requirements:
Order some turbine generators on a trailer. Connect to a natural gas pipe and run some extension cords into your building from the parking lot. No permits, no muss, no fuss.