Originally posted by: simpsoholic
Which one would you reccommend? I'm going to be running some fairly new PC games, eg. Black and White 2, Sims 2 ect.
This is quite a big upgrade from my old... really old MX 440.
Oh BTW, i found both of these cards for $100 (AUD) and they both have 256mb of memory.
Something I'm not sure was brought up here so far: neither the 9550 nor any 6200 has more than a 128 Bit bandwidth, and they run relatively slowly. In almost every case where extra video RAM beyond 128 might be useful, these cards have narrower bandwidth that makes the extra RAM requirte a faster card to get any use from it. I was also surprised by the specs for a 6200TC at gpureview, showing that while a regular 6200 (now a bit hard to find in the market) has the 128 Bit Bandwidth, the TC may have only 64 Bits?
What that means is that if you pay extra for 256 MB's instead of 128 MB's, you get no real benefit. The card manufacturers are using the extra RAM as a sales gimmick only.
Meanwhile, someone said that a TC16 has only 16 MB's of its own RAM, but it doesn't seem that gpureview's specifications database knows that. They are showing it with 128 MB's of RAM. I don't
*know* what the TC-16 and TC-32 mean, but from that site's data, it doesn't seem to refer to total onboard RAM. The MX 440 wasn't at all powerful, even when first released as an MX400, so even the TC's would be some upgrade, but miles short of enough to handle a shooter of any kind, or an MMORPG.
But I don't think that the Sims, not any of the games of that sort, put much demand on the video card speedwise. Black and White may call for more. Nope. According to the official requirements, a 64 MB FX of any sort is enough, as is a 6200.
http://blackandwhite2.ea.com/good.asp?language=us
Incidentally, you don't want to visit that URL without broadband. It takes FOREVER to get the audio clips downloaded (well, I found a switch to turn sound off, but the site still drags badly on POTS).
:frown: