http://www.warp2search.net/article.php?sid=12069&mode=thread&order=0
5900 as the number possibly.
The Radeon 9700PRO was the ATi flagship for 6 months, before the revision to the 9800, a small performance increase over its predecessor, normally ATi change numbers totally with each new major revision. (R100 was I believe, the 7x00 series, R200 was 8500, R300 was 9500-9700)
nVidia seems to be the same (NV20 was the GF3, NV25 was GF4, NV30 was FX line) and each itineration changed the model numbers (NV20 - GF3 Tix00, NV25 - GF4 Ti4x00, NV30 - GF FX 5x00), so, if the NV35 (logical number progression) is really the same sort of step as previous generations, why is the rumour floating that it will only be the GF FX 5900, surely a change to GF FX 6x00 would be logical, unless, like ATi, the change isn't that big (9700 -> 9800).
Seems like it would be an odd way to name the card, if that is indeed what happens.
If it does happen, I wouldn't expect to see a huge performance increase, if they make it a 6x00 card, then I would expect something quite powerful from it.
However, these names/numers for the card are speculation, and we'll have to wait for the real name and real performance figures before really concluding anything. I would be slightly suprised to see it given the name 5x00 though.
5900 as the number possibly.
The Radeon 9700PRO was the ATi flagship for 6 months, before the revision to the 9800, a small performance increase over its predecessor, normally ATi change numbers totally with each new major revision. (R100 was I believe, the 7x00 series, R200 was 8500, R300 was 9500-9700)
nVidia seems to be the same (NV20 was the GF3, NV25 was GF4, NV30 was FX line) and each itineration changed the model numbers (NV20 - GF3 Tix00, NV25 - GF4 Ti4x00, NV30 - GF FX 5x00), so, if the NV35 (logical number progression) is really the same sort of step as previous generations, why is the rumour floating that it will only be the GF FX 5900, surely a change to GF FX 6x00 would be logical, unless, like ATi, the change isn't that big (9700 -> 9800).
Seems like it would be an odd way to name the card, if that is indeed what happens.
If it does happen, I wouldn't expect to see a huge performance increase, if they make it a 6x00 card, then I would expect something quite powerful from it.
However, these names/numers for the card are speculation, and we'll have to wait for the real name and real performance figures before really concluding anything. I would be slightly suprised to see it given the name 5x00 though.