Number Codes? what do these numbers mean?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jjzelinski

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2004
3,750
0
0
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: shinzwei
how did you get l and N? they arent in the picture you gave me.

You don't have any type of critical position with the government or anything do you?

Quit messing with the poor guy QBM!! This theorem has been around since the late sixties and I don't think it was ever classified. Dont see why it would be, anyways; Anniston's very popular in many circles, I'm sure he's at least heard of her or her work.
 

shinzwei

Banned
Jul 5, 2004
3,117
0
0
Lets not fight. Quit Banning Me can you make this as simple as you can? i admit I'm a moron when it comes to math so if thats what you wanted me to say then its been said;)
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: jjzelinski
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: shinzwei
how did you get l and N? they arent in the picture you gave me.

You don't have any type of critical position with the government or anything do you?

Quit messing with the poor guy QBM!! This theorem has been around since the late sixties and I don't think it was ever classified. Dont see why it would be, anyways; Anniston's very popular in many circles, I'm sure he's at least heard of her or her work.

It was my unserstanding that the theorem as it pertians to coding was still classified.
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: shinzwei
Lets not fight. Quit Banning Me can you make this as simple as you can? i admit I'm a moron when it comes to math so if thats what you wanted me to say then its been said;)

OK I'll go ahead and decode the third part

IHNFC=

I have no fvcking clue.
 

jjzelinski

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2004
3,750
0
0
It's been regularily used in practice in just about every mamography and fibromyaligea diagnoses since 3 Mean and a Baby was all the rage.

This is basic stuff we're talking about here, I expect Schizm will come running in here any minute feeling quite dumb that he didn't see it to begin with. If a tree falls in the forrest...
 

shinzwei

Banned
Jul 5, 2004
3,117
0
0
Hmm so thats how it works. Can you give me the rest of the codes and I'll try to figure out what they mean:)
 

Otaking

Diamond Member
Mar 13, 2000
5,219
0
0
OMG.

Stop humoring him, folks. This is the basis for Newton's 4th law of Thermodynamics. The numbers are equivalent to the molecular structure for the aluminium inorganic compound in terms of orthogonalization of the basis when used with Roothaan's equation. The X's are a dead giveaway in terms of density of its orbital matrix. And if you use the 4th set of numbers into orbital perturbation theory, the answer is right there.

:confused:
 

QuitBanningMe

Banned
Mar 2, 2005
5,038
2
0
Originally posted by: Otaking
OMG.

Stop humoring him, folks. This is the basis for Newton's 4th law of Thermodynamics. The numbers are equivalent to the molecular structure for the aluminium inorganic compound in terms of orthogonalization of the basis when used with Roothaan's equation. The X's are a dead giveaway in terms of density of its orbital matrix. And if you use the 4th set of numbers into orbital perturbation theory, the answer is right there.

:confused:

Sh1t, now I feel retarded. I honestly had no clue until you brought that knowledge back from wherever I put it many years ago.
 

Otaking

Diamond Member
Mar 13, 2000
5,219
0
0
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: Otaking
OMG.

Stop humoring him, folks. This is the basis for Newton's 4th law of Thermodynamics. The numbers are equivalent to the molecular structure for the aluminium inorganic compound in terms of orthogonalization of the basis when used with Roothaan's equation. The X's are a dead giveaway in terms of density of its orbital matrix. And if you use the 4th set of numbers into orbital perturbation theory, the answer is right there.

:confused:

Sh1t, now I feel retarded. I honestly had no clue until you brought that knowledge back from wherever I put it many years ago.

Geez. Like, use your brain, man!
 

SilentZero

Diamond Member
Apr 8, 2003
5,158
0
76
Originally posted by: Otaking
OMG.

Stop humoring him, folks. This is the basis for Newton's 4th law of Thermodynamics. The numbers are equivalent to the molecular structure for the aluminium inorganic compound in terms of orthogonalization of the basis when used with Roothaan's equation. The X's are a dead giveaway in terms of density of its orbital matrix. And if you use the 4th set of numbers into orbital perturbation theory, the answer is right there.

:confused:

Thought it was kepler's 3rd law..but now I see your point! OMG so damn easy!!!!!!
:laugh:
 

Epic Fail

Diamond Member
May 10, 2005
6,252
2
0
what are you guys talk5ing about???? there is no the3orem you need to apply to solve it..

reread the hint2s from the OMG postings4, they are the helpful ones, the others are just pulling your legs, this is very simple1
 

sniperruff

Lifer
Apr 17, 2002
11,644
2
0
it involves a giant green fruit (that may or may not have black strips)

and a device to cook burgers.
 

kranky

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
21,019
156
106
Why don't we give him a little more to work with? That original segment isn't very long.

See if this helps:
44E 80423 33 710459 850R229 X04