Nuke trader Khan gave major boost to Arab state

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Link

Jan. 4, 2005 0:32 | Updated Jan. 4, 2005 2:10
Exclusive: Nuke trader Khan gave major boost to Arab state
By ARIEH O'SULLIVAN

Days after former Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy expressed fears that Syria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia might have acquired some kind of nuclear capability via an illicit weapons trafficking network run by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the chief architect of Pakistan's nuclear bomb, Israeli military sources have told The Jerusalem Post that, thanks to Khan, one of those three Arab states now has the potential to achieve a "significant nuclear leap."

The sources said that Israel is aware of Khan's contacts with all three countries, but that he had provided to one of them expertise and material to manufacture nuclear bombs. They would not specify which country.

The sources also spoke of an assessment in the IDF that Arab terrorist organizations are stepping up their efforts to obtain weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear bombs.

They noted that there is now evidence of increased debate as to whether Islamic law could allow for the deaths of Muslims as part of the price when tens of millions of heathens are killed ? a debate whose very nature, the sources said, implies that thought is being given to the notion of using weapons of mass destruction.

In an interview with the Post last week, former Mossad chief and national security adviser Halevy spoke of his concerns, which he stressed did not derive from any recent access to classified material, that Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt might have acquired nuclear parts from Khan.

Khan had been running a black market in nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. According to a New York Times article last week, US intelligence and International Atomic Energy Association agents are working to untangle Khan's network. Investigators say he visited 18 countries, including Syria, Saudi Arabia and Egypt, on what they believe were business trips, either to buy materials like uranium ore or to sell atomic goods, before he was arrested.

Khan also divulged centrifuge technology and provided Libya with a design for nuclear bombs, the Times article said. But crucial questions about the extent of Khan's proliferation activities have remained unanswered because Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf pardoned him and has refused to allow him to be questioned directly by the CIA.




Meanwhile back at the Whitehouse, Bill and Monica were taking care of more important business...
 

GroundedSailor

Platinum Member
Feb 18, 2001
2,502
0
76
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Link

Meanwhile back at the Whitehouse, Bill and Monica were taking care of more important business...

Talk about spin :disgust:

How is that connected with Bill?

That is a recent article and assessment. If anyone the current administration should be the one dealing with it. But they're too busy fighting the war on terror which, according to them, began in Iraq and is inflaming more arabs against us.

 

illustri

Golden Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,490
0
0
just occurred to me:
I wonder if the fight against nuclear proliferation has any parallels to gun control?
I mean if more stringent gun control doesn't statistically affect gun crime, would restricting wmd's have any such luck?

if you outlaw wmds, only outlaws will have wmds
 

AnImuS

Senior member
Sep 28, 2001
939
0
0
Im surprised the Mossad didnt kill khan. Maybe too well guarded? Can't really blame any of these nations for wanting nukes since israel introduced them to the middle east.

Only thing for the US besides an attack is to build our defenses and maintain our capability to deliver our nuclear stockpile.
 

raildogg

Lifer
Aug 24, 2004
12,892
572
126
Originally posted by: Aimster
This story is BS. Check where it originated and you will see why it is BS.

AQ Khan is a known proliferator. How is it BS?

Look him up
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Khan should be shot. After, of course, being flayed and then dunked in a vat of acid.

I believe the Islamic world just might eventually use nuclear weapons against the US. Certainly enough of them would love to do just that.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Ozoned
Link

Meanwhile back at the Whitehouse, Bill and Monica were taking care of more important business...

Talk about spin :disgust:

How is that connected with Bill?

That is a recent article and assessment. If anyone the current administration should be the one dealing with it. But they're too busy fighting the war on terror which, according to them, began in Iraq and is inflaming more arabs against us.
It is a reference to the general time frame in which Khan proliferation,,,proliferated.



The war that we are engaged in began centuries ago Imho. The current situation is just a small piece of it.
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: illustri
just occurred to me:
I wonder if the fight against nuclear proliferation has any parallels to gun control?


I think that the fight is a noble one. If the weapons, that the west has created, fall into the hands of the likes of OBL, I believe you will have your answer.

 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Aimster
This story is BS. Check where it originated and you will see why it is BS.

I am curious as to why you question the source?:confused:

Please explain...

 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: AnImuS
Im surprised the Mossad didnt kill khan. Maybe too well guarded? Can't really blame any of these nations for wanting nukes since israel introduced them to the middle east.

Only thing for the US besides an attack is to build our defenses and maintain our capability to deliver our nuclear stockpile.
Or we could just submit to Islam.......

 

magomago

Lifer
Sep 28, 2002
10,973
14
76
What I wonder is why are we fine with Isreal accumulating as many weapons as it desires, whereas we care when an Arab nation buys glocks. It is PLAINLY obvious Isreal's technology and whatever it is (much of probably is classified) is FAR superior to what any Arab nation currently has.

What are we going to say later on when Iraq wants to accumulate weapons, etc? And their reason: counter growing influence of IRan, Turkey and Isreal. We going to say no and sit down and STFU?
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
Originally posted by: magomago
What I wonder is why are we fine with Isreal accumulating as many weapons as it desires, whereas we care when an Arab nation buys glocks. It is PLAINLY obvious Isreal's technology and whatever it is (much of probably is classified) is FAR superior to what any Arab nation currently has.

What are we going to say later on when Iraq wants to accumulate weapons, etc? And their reason: counter growing influence of IRan, Turkey and Isreal. We going to say no and sit down and STFU?

You REALLY need to think that through.

Israel does not randomly use their weapons; they use them to preserve their own existence as a nation against some very hostile neighbors. If all the arab states had nuclear weapons, fundamentalists eventually *would* get their hands on them, and someone *would* use them against the West.

These guys really do believe this is a centuries-old ongoing war between Islam and Western civilization. And I tend to agree.