NSA secretly collecting phone records of tens of millions of citizens and businesses with help of phone companies

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

blackllotus

Golden Member
May 30, 2005
1,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: robphelan
the statement bellsouth made was very specific that the "NSA" never had a "contract" with them to provide records.

people are theorizing that it was an arm of the NSA and it was an informal agreement.

When people have to start theorizing then logic and rational thought is usually tossed out the window.

Outside of AT&T has any of the telco's mentioned admitted to doing this?
And I guess that I havent been paying too much attention but has AT&T even admitted to it?

They'll never admit to something that will cost them billions of dollars in fines
 

blackllotus

Golden Member
May 30, 2005
1,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Genx87
So what is the latest on this story? I have heard everybody but AT&T that was mentioned in the story has said they arent part of this?

Is this another case of a journalist overblowing or getting hsi facts wrong?

Well Qwest admitted that they were approached by the NSA, so there is some truth behind the article.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: robphelan
the statement bellsouth made was very specific that the "NSA" never had a "contract" with them to provide records.

people are theorizing that it was an arm of the NSA and it was an informal agreement.

When people have to start theorizing then logic and rational thought is usually tossed out the window.

Outside of AT&T has any of the telco's mentioned admitted to doing this?
And I guess that I havent been paying too much attention but has AT&T even admitted to it?

They'll never admit to something that will cost them billions of dollars in fines

Fines from who? The govt they handed over the information to?

Like I said earlier.............

 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Genx87
So what is the latest on this story? I have heard everybody but AT&T that was mentioned in the story has said they arent part of this?

Is this another case of a journalist overblowing or getting hsi facts wrong?

Well Qwest admitted that they were approached by the NSA, so there is some truth behind the article.

Approached and giving are two seperate actions.
 

db

Lifer
Dec 6, 1999
10,575
292
126
"New Presidential Memorandum Permits Intelligence Director To Authorize Telcos [or any company] To Lie Without Violating Securities Law

"In recent days, AT&T, Bell South and Verizon have all issued statements denying that they?ve handed over phone records to the NSA, as reported by USA today....

"Ordinarily, a company that conceals their transactions and activities from the public would violate securities law. But an presidential memorandum signed by the President on May 5 allows the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, to authorize a company to conceal activities related to national security. (See 15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(3)(A))

"There is no evidence that this executive order has been used by John Negroponte with respect to the telcos. Of course, if it was used, we wouldn?t know about it. "

Link

 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: db
"New Presidential Memorandum Permits Intelligence Director To Authorize Telcos [or any company] To Lie Without Violating Securities Law

"In recent days, AT&T, Bell South and Verizon have all issued statements denying that they?ve handed over phone records to the NSA, as reported by USA today....

"Ordinarily, a company that conceals their transactions and activities from the public would violate securities law. But an presidential memorandum signed by the President on May 5 allows the Director of National Intelligence, John Negroponte, to authorize a company to conceal activities related to national security. (See 15 U.S.C. 78m(b)(3)(A))

"There is no evidence that this executive order has been used by John Negroponte with respect to the telcos. Of course, if it was used, we wouldn?t know about it. "

Link

Read about that yesterday... well that settles the dispute on whether or not the phone companies did it.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Nice cover up by everyone involved. <golf clap> Now, if it were legal for the gov't to obtain those records from the telcos and legal for the telcos to hand it over, then why bother covering it up?
 

db

Lifer
Dec 6, 1999
10,575
292
126
Of course he'll be confirmed. BushCo does what it wants, sometimes even against the wishes of its own party. Besides, this isn't about America; it's about bringing about the End Times and making the rich richer in the meantime.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
UPDATE: Klein has published his allegations including diagrams and tech details on the NSA equipment installed, etc. here:

Wired.com

From the article:

Former AT&T technician Mark Klein is the key witness in the Electronic Frontier Foundation's class-action lawsuit against the telecommunications company, which alleges that AT&T cooperated in an illegal National Security Agency domestic surveillance program.

In a public statement Klein issued last month, he described the NSA's visit to an AT&T office. In an older, less-public statement recently acquired by Wired News, Klein goes into additional details of his discovery of an alleged surveillance operation in an AT&T building in San Francisco.

Klein supports his claim by attaching excerpts of three internal company documents: a Dec. 10, 2002, manual titled "Study Group 3, LGX/Splitter Wiring, San Francisco," a Jan. 13, 2003, document titled "SIMS, Splitter Cut-In and Test Procedure" and a second "Cut-In and Test Procedure" dated Jan. 24, 2003.

Here we present Klein's statement in its entirety, with inline links to all of the document excerpts where he cited them. You can also download the complete file here (pdf). The full AT&T documents are filed under seal in federal court in San Francisco.

Linkage
 

sumyungai

Senior member
Dec 28, 2005
344
0
0
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.
 

Darkhawk28

Diamond Member
Dec 22, 2000
6,759
0
0
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Great. I'll be putting a camera in your house today. You're doing nothing wrong, right??
 

ExpertNovice

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
939
0
0
Strange, my liberal friends told me I was just being a political hack when I was outraged by Clinton authorized the capturing of all electronic transmissions and scanning those transmissions for specific words.

Once again my liberal friends are telling me that I'm a political hack because I have only some reservations at the thought of capturing telephone numbers (no transmissions and no names).

Yep, listening in and retaining conversations is ok if a liberal is doing it but simply collecting numbers is bad if a conservative is doing it. No hypocrisy there.
 

WHAMPOM

Diamond Member
Feb 28, 2006
7,628
183
106
Originally posted by: blackllotus
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: robphelan
the statement bellsouth made was very specific that the "NSA" never had a "contract" with them to provide records.
people are theorizing that it was an arm of the NSA and it was an informal agreement.

Lawyer speak right there. When the weasel words come out, they are
covering their a$$es for sure.


When people have to start theorizing then logic and rational thought is usually tossed out the window.

Outside of AT&T has any of the telco's mentioned admitted to doing this?
And I guess that I havent been paying too much attention but has AT&T even admitted to it?

They'll never admit to something that will cost them billions of dollars in fines

They have lawyered up, we cannot expect to get anything but spin now.
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Can I come to your house and go through all your things? After all, you don't have anything to hide.
The "nothing to hide" is a retarded argument and shouldn't be used by anyone who can tie their own shoes.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: ExpertNovice
Strange, my liberal friends told me I was just being a political hack when I was outraged by Clinton authorized the capturing of all electronic transmissions and scanning those transmissions for specific words.

Once again my liberal friends are telling me that I'm a political hack because I have only some reservations at the thought of capturing telephone numbers (no transmissions and no names).

Yep, listening in and retaining conversations is ok if a liberal is doing it but simply collecting numbers is bad if a conservative is doing it. No hypocrisy there.

Well perhaps you should stop hanging out with such hypocrites. Otherwise, your annecdotal data simply doesn't necessarily apply to liberals at large. "Carnivore" and similar Clinton-era efforts were nasty, civil-rights voiding programs too. Doesn't matter who's in charge, the public needs to resist efforts like this.

Grabbing aggregate data for all U.S. calls may slide in under most people's radar, until you inform them that if the NSA found a particular trend interesting, they could quite easily go back and get the identities that correspond to those calls.

It's like playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. Put enough aggregate data into the NSA computers and out come all sorts of interesting trends. So if you live in Brooklyn and just happen to like the same restaurant as suspected terrorists, woops! You've just earned a permanent pen register tap on all of your lines of communication.

Yay for liberty! :|
 

imported_Aelius

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,988
0
0
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Next time you go to the bathroom and take a sh!t I hope you won't mind if I open your bathroom door and watch while you do it.

... same thing
 

OrByte

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
9,303
144
106
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.
Where have you been dude? that rationale has been passe for months now!



 

sumyungai

Senior member
Dec 28, 2005
344
0
0
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Next time you go to the bathroom and take a sh!t I hope you won't mind if I open your bathroom door and watch while you do it.

... same thing

If you could make us safer in some way by doing so, then by all means.
 

sumyungai

Senior member
Dec 28, 2005
344
0
0
Originally posted by: CitizenKain
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Can I come to your house and go through all your things? After all, you don't have anything to hide.
The "nothing to hide" is a retarded argument and shouldn't be used by anyone who can tie their own shoes.

If you are a law enforcement officer and what you are doing can make the world a better place, then by all means. Otherwise, you're just whining. Why don't you complain about the airport taking away privacy when they search our bags? What about theme parks such as Disney taking away our privacy when they search our bags? Where is the outcry when you walk into a 7-Eleven and get recorded on a security camera?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Aelius
Originally posted by: sumyungai
Seems like the ones complaining are doing something illegal and are afraid of being caught, otherwise, what is all the whine about? Just like the people who speed on the highway are the ones who hate highway troopers, but the ones who obey the speed limit sign can care less.

Next time you go to the bathroom and take a sh!t I hope you won't mind if I open your bathroom door and watch while you do it.

... same thing

Don't forget being told where and when you can go to the bathroom.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: sumyungai
If you are a law enforcement officer and what you are doing can make the world a better place, then by all means. Otherwise, you're just whining. Why don't you complain about the airport taking away privacy when they search our bags? What about theme parks such as Disney taking away our privacy when they search our bags? Where is the outcry when you walk into a 7-Eleven and get recorded on a security camera?
Totally two different things bud. I expect to have privacy in my own home (especially from my government). I don't expect the same when I'm out and about.