Now with KT266A, Tbird 1.4 vs P4 2.0

xtreme2k

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2000
3,078
0
0

zippy

Diamond Member
Nov 10, 1999
9,998
1
0
HOLY CRAP! Reading the article...those performance increases are astounding! It almost leads me to believe that one of the engineers had a stroke of genius one day and said, "WHOA! If we do <insert brilliant idea> then this chipset would kick the ass!" :p I hope that guy got a raise! ;)
 

Scouzer

Lifer
Jun 3, 2001
10,358
5
0
Anyone know if:

ECS is making a KT266A board?
How much does the KT266A cost?
 

Adul

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
32,999
44
91
danny.tangtam.com


<< All results taken from Anandtech's article http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1528&p=7 http://www.anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1524&p=9 Benchmark / Tbird 1.4/ P4 2.0 ---------------------------------------- Business Winstone / 60.4 / 53.9 CC Winstone / 75.6 / 71.3 Office Sysmark / 166 / 151 ICC Sysmark / 161 / 217 Office Bench / 17.4 / 21.0 <--- Lower is better 3DSMax / 16.2 / 17.2 <--- Lower is better Q3A / 223.6 / 240.5 DroneZ / 114.66 / 124.6 Aquamark / 47.4 / 42.4 Man :) >>



OMG, someone get a Athlon mp in there stat!
 

xtreme2k

Diamond Member
Jun 3, 2000
3,078
0
0
There wasnt any Athlon MP results on KT266A, that was why I didnt compare it. :)

I am 'expecting' Athlon MP 1.4-1.53 to KICK P4 2.0GHz ass in Quake3.
 

ChipNOW

Senior member
May 8, 2000
701
0
0
xtreme2k have you seen AthlonMP (board or cpu) in Sydney at all? Not that I've looked that hard but I haven't seen it in Melb
 

formulav8

Diamond Member
Sep 18, 2000
7,004
523
126
The P4 with a 600mhz advantage is looking worse and worse(Not like it looked good in the first place for being at 2ghz.)
 

pay

Golden Member
Jan 28, 2001
1,401
0
71
geez.. intel better make some drastic changes with northwood..
 

erub

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2000
5,481
0
0
I still can't understand why we can't compare the flagship chips just as that - flagship chips, w/o menitoning the clock speed advantage one holds over the other. We should refer to their mhz as model numbers, which is what AMD is going to do eventually, like comparing a Ford Mustang GT with a Chevy Camaro Z28. Who cares if one is 50 lbs heavier than the other but has a .1 larger of a L engine(weighed down by a longer IPC), you should still compare their performance going 0-60 the same way. I hope this made some sense :)