Now that's a fast WU! :D

m00kie

Junior Member
Sep 1, 2001
23
0
0
I've noticed that on WU's with a XXX.102 name. It winds up with about 180 spikes in seconds.

Be on the lookout for XXX.153 WU's, They tend to take seconds also, except these generate 150 - 160 Triplets and are never returned. It's one of those WU's that generate an extremely large result file that the client fails to return. Wouldn't be a big deal except at least in my case they tend to hang and I'll find SetiDriver is idle. I have to shut it down and restart. Hours wasted :(
 

Confused

Elite Member
Nov 13, 2000
14,166
0
0


<<
SetiQueue's History Entry
Seti File Name 08dc00aa.10289.23058.567336.102
Time Recorded Fri 2000 Dec 08 16:42:53 (295 days 19 hr 23 min ago)
Ra, Dec 18.938, 22.15
Angle Range 0.406
Estimated Tera FLOPs 4.12055
Downloaded from seti@home Sun 2001 Sep 09 12:32:04 (21 days 0 hr 33 min ago)
Downloaded from SetiQueue Sun 2001 Sep 09 13:06:18 (20 days 23 hr 59 min ago)
Uploaded to SetiQueue Mon 2001 Sep 10 7:23:46 (20 days 5 hr 42 min ago)
Uploaded to seti@home at Tue 2001 Sep 11 7:06:32 (19 days 5 hr 59 min ago)
Last upload status success

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Completed by confused
Seti User ID 2591970
Platform i386-winnt-cmdline
Seti@home Version 3.03
Cpu Time 23 sec
14-Day Average Cpu Time 5 hr 38 min
Elapsed Time 18 hr 17 min (0% efficient)
>>



From this page on my SetiQ :)

i've also had a 43sec WU before, but that was before i started runnning SetiQ :(

ConfusedBW