Now it is legal to unlock your cell phone.

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
UNinnovate
Early Christmas Present: Now it?s legal to unlock your cellphone
November 23rd, 2006 | Category: Uncategorized
Most cell phones in the United States are purchased as part of a service plan. The phone itself is cheap or free, but it must be bought as part of a one-year or two-year service contract. Phones can also be purchased separately, but are often hundreds of dollars more expensive then the phones that come with service plans. This is because phone companies take a loss on the phone up front and hope to make up that loss over the life of the contract in monthy fees.
Nearly all of the phones purchased as part of a service plan (and even some that are purchased separately) are SIM locked to only work with that phone companies? network. The phone?s software will reject SIM cards from competing phone networks. Phones bought from T-Mobile only work with T-Mobile, phones bought from Cingular only work with Cingular, etc. This way the phone company can be certain that a customer is stuck and they will make back their investment.

The problem is that even when the contract is complete, many phone companies will not unlock the phone or will only unlock it through a complicated or poorly advertised process. This is designed to make it less it appealing for customers to switch services because they will have to purchase new phones, but it also causes headaches for frequent travellers or people who have relocated to a new country. For example, a U.S.-based traveller in China must pay absurdly high international rates to use their U.S. cell phone within China. If the phone was unlocked, they could pick up a new Chinese SIM card for a few dollars and have local phone service at a fraction of the price of international service.

Like all software locks, SIM locking can be broken and often is. However, this is a grey market or black market activity in the U.S. Breaking the SIM locks involves modifying the phone?s internal software. Phone companies leverage copyright circumvention restrictions in the DMCA that make it illegal to sell or use a device that circumvents copyright. In effect, it is not legal for a user to modify their own cellphone even if they own it because it would potentially violate the copyright of the phone?s software.

Yesterday, the Library of Congress announced six new exceptions to DMCA rules. Among those was the declaration that breaking SIM locks will not be considered a DMCA violation starting on Monday:

5. Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network.

Library of Congress Rulemaking Statement

This has the potential to legitimize the shady market of cell phone unlockers. It also has the potential to change how cell phone companies do business. If awareness of these rules spreads and legitimate cell phone unlocker services appear, the current cell phone business model might not make as much sense. It is also likely to further frustrate ?pay as you go? cell phone providers who have been trying to stop resellers who purchase their phones and then sell them overseas for a profit.

 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
1: That was 6 months ago...

2: Woopty. Doesn't mean that the company has to unlock the phone. Just that it's not illegal to unlock it by other means. So you can't call up Cingular and demand them unlock your Nokia N92. They don't have to.
 

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
1: That was 6 months ago...

2: Woopty. Doesn't mean that the company has to unlock the phone. Just that it's not illegal to unlock it by other means. So you can't call up Cingular and demand them unlock your Nokia N92. They don't have to.

if you read the bottom of the page, they are adding 5 more exceptions to the DMCA.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
1: That was 6 months ago...

2: Woopty. Doesn't mean that the company has to unlock the phone. Just that it's not illegal to unlock it by other means. So you can't call up Cingular and demand them unlock your Nokia N92. They don't have to.

if you read the bottom of the page, they are adding 5 more exceptions to the DMCA.
Yes, the exception to the DMCA means it's no longer illegal to unlock it, but that doesn't mean the vendor / cell provider has to do it for you.

 

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Originally posted by: tagej
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
1: That was 6 months ago...

2: Woopty. Doesn't mean that the company has to unlock the phone. Just that it's not illegal to unlock it by other means. So you can't call up Cingular and demand them unlock your Nokia N92. They don't have to.

if you read the bottom of the page, they are adding 5 more exceptions to the DMCA.
Yes, the exception to the DMCA means it's no longer illegal to unlock it, but that doesn't mean the vendor / cell provider has to do it for you.

the vendor will do it after you have completed some time with them.
 

fLum0x

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2004
1,660
0
0
what is the point? every time someone gets a new contract, they get a new phone. I don't really see how this is a benefit to the consumer.
 

mzkhadir

Diamond Member
Mar 6, 2003
9,509
1
76
Originally posted by: fLum0x
what is the point? every time someone gets a new contract, they get a new phone. I don't really see how this is a benefit to the consumer.

for international travel, high fees for international use. Use a local sim, get cheaper rates.
 

GrantMeThePower

Platinum Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,923
2
0
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
Originally posted by: tagej
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
1: That was 6 months ago...

2: Woopty. Doesn't mean that the company has to unlock the phone. Just that it's not illegal to unlock it by other means. So you can't call up Cingular and demand them unlock your Nokia N92. They don't have to.

if you read the bottom of the page, they are adding 5 more exceptions to the DMCA.
Yes, the exception to the DMCA means it's no longer illegal to unlock it, but that doesn't mean the vendor / cell provider has to do it for you.

the vendor will do it after you have completed some time with them.

Not all of them. Tmobile always has done this after 90 days, but cingular wont.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
It is also likely to further frustrate ?pay as you go? cell phone providers who have been trying to stop resellers who purchase their phones and then sell them overseas for a profit.

great idea! time to quit my job and start a cellphone business!
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
and i for one welcome our new 3 year contract overlords.
 

Double Trouble

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,270
103
106
Originally posted by: ElFenix
and i for one welcome our new 3 year contract overlords.
I'm surprised the cell phone carriers haven't made a push for 3 year contracts yet :disgust:

 

atomicacid55

Member
Jan 10, 2006
112
0
71
Originally posted by: fLum0x
what is the point? every time someone gets a new contract, they get a new phone. I don't really see how this is a benefit to the consumer.

Uhhh. To me, you're saying "Who cares if you can overclock?"

Seriously. Unlocked cells can go worldwide. Why get restricted with a fcking Cingular SIM?

This is sad. 98% of the US probably buys locked phones from their local Cingular store or Tmobile store. Then there are those Asian stores around the corner that offer insane deals like FREE RAZRs over TWO YEARS AGO, yet people are still piling on that POS phone. Anyways, I have NEVER bought a locked cell phone in my life. The only time was when I was offered a Motorola V600 for $39.99 2 months after it came out only because my favorite store ran out of the debranded free ones. $39.99 wasn't too much to chew on so I whatever. In any case, they unlocked the phone for me so I could still use it worldwide.

If you're still buying branded phones, sucks for you. The only reason I could see you doing that is if you can actually get a great deal, but then again since when were branded phones any good? (Exception: Cingular's SE W810i)
 

giantpinkbunnyhead

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2005
3,251
1
0
I suppose that's good to know, but as I get free long distance and roaming anywhere in North America, I'm hardly concerned about whether my phone is unlocked or not. Then again, I don't use TMobile or Cingular either.
 

tm37

Lifer
Jan 24, 2001
12,436
1
0
Unless you plan on moving between networks, a unlocked phone is kinda worthless.

Even when I am in europe I just use my phone rather than get a new sim card.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
heh i didn't know it was ever against the law. but guess this is good if you buy something like a pda phone or such and switch company's
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
Originally posted by: atomicacid55

If you're still buying branded phones, sucks for you. The only reason I could see you doing that is if you can actually get a great deal, but then again since when were branded phones any good? (Exception: Cingular's SE W810i)

You have no choice on Sprint. If it's not a Sprint phone, they won't activate it. No matter what.
 

Jawo

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2005
4,125
0
0
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Originally posted by: atomicacid55

If you're still buying branded phones, sucks for you. The only reason I could see you doing that is if you can actually get a great deal, but then again since when were branded phones any good? (Exception: Cingular's SE W810i)

You have no choice on Sprint. If it's not a Sprint phone, they won't activate it. No matter what.

Verizon's the same way...CDMA doesnt have easily replaceable SIMs