Originally posted by: jman19
How is this ironic?
Originally posted by: Siva
I think the irony is that she's the moral authority on one stupid hot button issue, but not the moral authority on her own husband. That might be irony.
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Siva
I think the irony is that she's the moral authority on one stupid hot button issue, but not the moral authority on her own husband. That might be irony.
I can't see it. Perhaps if SHE were the one engaged in illicit behavior in the White House, that would be ironic, but it hardly seems ironic that she had a cheating spouse, then spoke out on a "morality" issue.
Originally posted by: Mo0o
isn't this a repost?
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Yay for government censorship, eh?
Originally posted by: remagavon
Yeah seriously.. in order to capitalize on this they should release the content in the AO version for all systems as a special edition, then edit out the code and rerelease the M rated one. More money for them, and everybody is happy.
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Yay for government censorship, eh?
WTH does the government have to do with it? Neither Rockstar, nor the ESRB, are government enteties.
Censorship is the government saying that you aren't allowed to express certain ideas. All that's happened here is that HRC has said that the rating the ESRB gave GTSA is not congruent with the (hidden) content of the game, and the ESRB agreed with her.
Note that Rockstar could maintain the status quo indefinitely with the current rating of AO. For that matter, they could ship games now with the content unlocked from the factory and keep the AO rating.
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: remagavon
Yeah seriously.. in order to capitalize on this they should release the content in the AO version for all systems as a special edition, then edit out the code and rerelease the M rated one. More money for them, and everybody is happy.
If you understand how the "Hot Coffee" mod works, you'd know that's exactly what they'd set themselves up to do. The disc has the equiv. of a properties file that has a line in it that defines the content level of the game. If it's set for mature, no sex. If it's set for AO, sex.
It'd be like Microsoft having one line, or even one bit, that changed XP Home to XP Pro.
Originally posted by: Siva
I think the irony is that she's the moral authority on one stupid hot button issue, but not the moral authority on her own husband. That might be irony.
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Originally posted by: TerryMathews
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Yay for government censorship, eh?
WTH does the government have to do with it? Neither Rockstar, nor the ESRB, are government enteties.
Censorship is the government saying that you aren't allowed to express certain ideas. All that's happened here is that HRC has said that the rating the ESRB gave GTSA is not congruent with the (hidden) content of the game, and the ESRB agreed with her.
Note that Rockstar could maintain the status quo indefinitely with the current rating of AO. For that matter, they could ship games now with the content unlocked from the factory and keep the AO rating.
No, neither one of them are gov't entities. But legislation was threatened, and you don't think Hillary speaking out against it is the major force that caused them to change the rating? This is indirect censorship.
