- Nov 30, 2005
- 50,235
- 117
- 116
LOL @ the advertising of Catfish
This is a much better example than mine. It was marketed as a fucking horror movie!
KT
LOL @ the advertising of Catfish
I think it could be a case of both - for the general public it could be a non-issue; for enthusiasts it could really jar you out of your versimilitude; like for'nstance - why the hell does the bad guys in Iron Man 2 stay down/get KO'd when they are taken down by Scarlett Johanssen's character? It's not like she did anything that's particularly injuring outside of falling down. And if they have a condition where tripping is fatal, why are they hired on as security in the first place? And where did they find such a large group of people with the same condition? Were they just participants in a pharmaceutical test next door?
Of course it's not the best an example where a man in an iron suit can fly around, shoot balls of light at enemies and everything explodes, but you get the idea.
But is that not a fault of the marketing department, not the film? There are examples of marketing misrepresenting films every month, I mean look at The American from last year, that one was grossly misrepresented in the marketing; it does not make it a bad film and it's not the fault of the film nor the Director.
Would you not agree that a film with a limited budget and time constraints, is better served by spending that time on making a coherent narrative and a satisfying film, rather than getting minor details correct?
While I agree you should always try your best to get as many of these things correct as you can, there are often limitations in place that prohibit those making the film from getting everything right. I have not looked at the numbers, but I have to imagine Gone in 60 Seconds had a much larger budget and more time to get those details correct, not to mention that was the focal point of that film and was really all it had going for it. Would you exchange the proper rims on a vehicle in that movie for a more gratifying story? I know I would.
KT
Oh definitely, characters/plot/direction is more important absolutely.
Details do matter though, and the big ones aren't difficult to get correct. Hell, a hypothetical thread posted here in AT would have answered the question easily, and that wouldn't have cost a dime. Not to mention the countless other resources available in that area.
To go back to the gun example, this has gotten pretty good over the past 15 years or so, where I see relatively few errors with firearms in quality films. I think at least some of that is due to the quality of experts on the subject that manage such stunts, which got much greater scrutiny after Brandon Lee's accidental death.
Mad Men is a good example of people making a concerted effort to get details right, and it pays off. Of course mistakes will still slip through, but it's only a good thing to approach filmmaking with an eye towards realism unless you're dealing in a fantasy/absurd realm.
Even good Sci-Fi is founded in some kind of consistency.
I've watched Flipped, Senna and Crazy, Stupid, Love on my flight to India.
I liked Flipped.. absolutely loved Senna and thought CSL was meh. For some reason.. I hate Emma Stone even more. :hmm:
I felt the opposite. I think it was not nearly as funny as I expected, or it could have been. There were a couple funny parts, but overall I thought it was predictable with generally "filler" type scenes. When it was the group of guys all together it was pretty funny. Other than that, thought it was boring. I gave it a 4/10 just for the hotness factor of Nicky Whelan, Jenna Fischer and Applegate.Hall Pass - 6.5/10: Actually much funnier than I expected, but not really a good movie. I do like Owen Wilson, no matter what people think, and his character here is fun and endearing like he always seems to be. Unfortunately it just drags on too long and has a painfully predictable last 20 minutes or so which bored me, but I have to admit I laughed at several gags throughout the rest of the movie. Not much else to say.
Hilarious movie. Agreed it was a bit short, and unfortunate because as you said the acting and storyline were both very well done.I Sell the Dead
2008
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0902290/
7/10
This one was a surprise. I hadn't really heard of it before, and wasn't expecting much from it, but it was hilarious and VERY well acted across the board. Story was very entertaining. Could have been made longer, but I suspect this was a case of "director ran outta money so wrapped things up" ....
has anyone been using Watch It? I just signed up. I looked quickly and I'm assuming there's no way to import my netflix queue, right? I rather not manually import 600 movies :/ I do like the concept a lot though, so I might do it anyway. Especially considering that netflix just erases movies from your streaming queue that are no longer available.
edit: I was just playing around with it. It's still in Beta and it shows. I tried adding about 5 movies. One of them was listed four separate times, another wasn't listed at all. Out of the movies I was able to add, only one seemed to correctly show that I could get the DVD via netflix. They've got some work to do, so I don't think it's worth the effort to convert my queue just yet.
DEC 25
I have a bad feeling about it but I hope that The Darkest Hour (in theaters Dec 25) gets decent reviews. The good news is that the previews make it look pretty stupid so if the reviews come in and it is pretty good, I'm seeing it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Darkest_Hour_(film)
Anyone have thoughts on this one?
2012
Other than that, in 2012 I am only looking forward to Prometheus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus_(film)
I have high hopes for this one. I hope it does not disappoint.
I've liked the Men In Black franchise thus far. So I am happy about MiB 3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_in_Black_III
The big July 4 release is a new Spiderman movie. Personally, I don't care about it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Amazing_Spider-Man_(2012_film)
The Darkest Hour sounds a bit interesting and it's by the guy that did Right At Your Door, which was a flawed, but interesting little indie movie. I am intrigued by The Darkest Hour for that reason and if the reviews are half-way decent I'll probably see it.
Definitely looking forward to Prometheus. I've lost track of exactly what the story is now, but I don't really care. Ridley Scott in space is enough to get my ass in the seat.
I have no attachment to MiB and Spider Man looks dumb.
KT
Huh I knew nothing about Prometheus before this. Interesting looking. But...
"
In October of 2010, Lindelof submitted the revised screenplay to 20th Century Fox. The studio was pleased because it had contested Scott's proposed budget of $150160 million and found Lindelof's screenplay to be more budget-conscious; Scott had initially requested a $250 million budget along with an R rating, but 20th Century Fox was reluctant to invest so much money in a film that was not PG-13.
"
So.. it's going to be PG-13?