Not the ACORN I knew...

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Tough to see with those blinders on?

"There are atleast 800 thousand reasons why BHO's associations are more serious." <- reference to his campaign's payment for "staging, sound, lighting." to an "affiliate" that was actually for a get out the vote(BHO's camp originally lied) - which is.... surprise....what acorn also does...

But if you want more - he was a lawyer for them? Boy...that's equal to being at a amnesty rally that was co-sponsored by ACORN. Need more? BHO's "truth" site lies?

If you can't see the difference(from the first reference) then there is no point in even talking with you on this subject.... I've included the other 2 as a bonus, in hopes you snap out of your delusions....

Uh huh... and what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's?

Taking on a legitimate legal case and helping "get out the vote" are not illegal activities, last I checked. Do you have any evidence that any illegal or untoward took place? Nor is ACORN an illegal organization, despite some its recent publicized troubles. Or are you saying it is? Then perhaps it is you who are the joke with delusions? Or maybe you're just -- as usual -- regurgitating the latest RNC talking points without a shred of understanding? Yeah, I'd say so.

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

F'n apologists...

F'n desperate lunatics

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Tough to see with those blinders on?

"There are atleast 800 thousand reasons why BHO's associations are more serious." <- reference to his campaign's payment for "staging, sound, lighting." to an "affiliate" that was actually for a get out the vote(BHO's camp originally lied) - which is.... surprise....what acorn also does...

But if you want more - he was a lawyer for them? Boy...that's equal to being at a amnesty rally that was co-sponsored by ACORN. Need more? BHO's "truth" site lies?

If you can't see the difference(from the first reference) then there is no point in even talking with you on this subject.... I've included the other 2 as a bonus, in hopes you snap out of your delusions....

Uh huh... and what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's?

Taking on a legitimate legal case and helping "get out the vote" are not illegal activities, last I checked. Do you have any evidence that any illegal or untoward took place? Nor is ACORN an illegal organization, despite some its recent publicized troubles. Or are you saying it is? Then perhaps it is you who are the joke with delusions? Or maybe you're just -- as usual -- regurgitating the latest RNC talking points without a shred of understanding? Yeah, I'd say so.

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

F'n apologists...

What exactly am I supposed to be apologizing for if there is no evidence and no accusation of any wrongdoing?

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it


ACORN for decades has been a group interested in registering more voters. It's focused on the poor. It tends to hire people like homeless people, and other poor, to register voters.

It pays them by the registration, so sometimes the workers do wrong and submit phony registrations - they'll put in registrations for 'Mickey Mouse' or a bunch that they signed themselves, all with the same signature, to make a little extra money. *ACORN reviews every submitted registration form and researches every suspicious form*. ACORN supervisors make phone calls to verify the suspicious forms.

Now here's the kicker: ACORN is required by law to submit all the forms, no matter how obvious the problem. And so they break out the suspicous forms, and submit them as suspicious with the rest of the forms, because they have to. Republicans know they have to do this - and so they take advantage of it, by taking those forms submitted as suspicious, and then telling the media how they're proof of ACORN voter fraud.

(Some suspect the Republicans might even put people in as ACORN workers to submit some of the false forms, but it doesn't matter to the larger issue).

So, this is an outrageous lie by the Republicans. Their actual agenda is to *oppose* democracy by trying to minimize the number of new voters - mostly democratic - registered by making attacks they know are false against the group who is doing a great job at getting a lot of people registered.

Let's remember where the real corruption is - how the Bush administration pressured US Attorneys to file charges against ACORN for voter fraud, and when the US Attorneys did large investigations and found there were zero prosecutable cases from the investigations, the admnistration got rid of the Atorneys for refusing to file false prosecutions, behaving as the law should and does require.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Tough to see with those blinders on?

"There are atleast 800 thousand reasons why BHO's associations are more serious." <- reference to his campaign's payment for "staging, sound, lighting." to an "affiliate" that was actually for a get out the vote(BHO's camp originally lied) - which is.... surprise....what acorn also does...

But if you want more - he was a lawyer for them? Boy...that's equal to being at a amnesty rally that was co-sponsored by ACORN. Need more? BHO's "truth" site lies?

If you can't see the difference(from the first reference) then there is no point in even talking with you on this subject.... I've included the other 2 as a bonus, in hopes you snap out of your delusions....

Uh huh... and what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's?

Taking on a legitimate legal case and helping "get out the vote" are not illegal activities, last I checked. Do you have any evidence that any illegal or untoward took place? Nor is ACORN an illegal organization, despite some its recent publicized troubles. Or are you saying it is? Then perhaps it is you who are the joke with delusions? Or maybe you're just -- as usual -- regurgitating the latest RNC talking points without a shred of understanding? Yeah, I'd say so.

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

F'n apologists...

What exactly am I supposed to be apologizing for if there is no evidence and no accusation of any wrongdoing?

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

What part of that do you not understand?
You sTROLLED into this thread when I responded to some moron who claimed that BHO's involvement with ACORN and McCain's involvement were equal. Try to follow along here Vic. I know it's hard for you apologists to do... but atleast make an effort. Sheesh.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Tough to see with those blinders on?

"There are atleast 800 thousand reasons why BHO's associations are more serious." <- reference to his campaign's payment for "staging, sound, lighting." to an "affiliate" that was actually for a get out the vote(BHO's camp originally lied) - which is.... surprise....what acorn also does...

But if you want more - he was a lawyer for them? Boy...that's equal to being at a amnesty rally that was co-sponsored by ACORN. Need more? BHO's "truth" site lies?

If you can't see the difference(from the first reference) then there is no point in even talking with you on this subject.... I've included the other 2 as a bonus, in hopes you snap out of your delusions....

Uh huh... and what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's?

Taking on a legitimate legal case and helping "get out the vote" are not illegal activities, last I checked. Do you have any evidence that any illegal or untoward took place? Nor is ACORN an illegal organization, despite some its recent publicized troubles. Or are you saying it is? Then perhaps it is you who are the joke with delusions? Or maybe you're just -- as usual -- regurgitating the latest RNC talking points without a shred of understanding? Yeah, I'd say so.

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

F'n apologists...

What exactly am I supposed to be apologizing for if there is no evidence and no accusation of any wrongdoing?

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

What part of that do you not understand?
You sTROLLED into this thread when I responded to some moron who claimed that BHO's involvement with ACORN and McCain's involvement were equal. Try to follow along here Vic. I know it's hard for you apologists to do... but atleast make an effort. Sheesh.

So this whole thread is just you storming in your teacup then?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it

<snipped>

Yes, I read the apologist BS by RR.

Yes, it's finally being exposed, but my question was if it was being stopped.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Tough to see with those blinders on?

"There are atleast 800 thousand reasons why BHO's associations are more serious." <- reference to his campaign's payment for "staging, sound, lighting." to an "affiliate" that was actually for a get out the vote(BHO's camp originally lied) - which is.... surprise....what acorn also does...

But if you want more - he was a lawyer for them? Boy...that's equal to being at a amnesty rally that was co-sponsored by ACORN. Need more? BHO's "truth" site lies?

If you can't see the difference(from the first reference) then there is no point in even talking with you on this subject.... I've included the other 2 as a bonus, in hopes you snap out of your delusions....

Uh huh... and what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's?

Taking on a legitimate legal case and helping "get out the vote" are not illegal activities, last I checked. Do you have any evidence that any illegal or untoward took place? Nor is ACORN an illegal organization, despite some its recent publicized troubles. Or are you saying it is? Then perhaps it is you who are the joke with delusions? Or maybe you're just -- as usual -- regurgitating the latest RNC talking points without a shred of understanding? Yeah, I'd say so.

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

F'n apologists...

What exactly am I supposed to be apologizing for if there is no evidence and no accusation of any wrongdoing?

No one said representing them was illegal. Where the hell are you getting these things? No one has stated that BHO was involved directly in ACORN's fraud so stop with the strawman BS.

What part of that do you not understand?
You sTROLLED into this thread when I responded to some moron who claimed that BHO's involvement with ACORN and McCain's involvement were equal. Try to follow along here Vic. I know it's hard for you apologists to do... but atleast make an effort. Sheesh.

So this whole thread is just you storming in your teacup then?

No, the latest portion has you being repeatedly owned due to you not being able to read. If you would have kept your knee in check(hard for apologists) then you wouldn't have posted the repeated nonsense you did. You ASSumed and got caught repeatedly stuffing straw. You should have quit a long time ago...

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it

<snipped>

Yes, I read the apologist BS by RR.

Yes, it's finally being exposed, but my question was if it was being stopped.

I guess that's the $64,000 question.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it


ACORN for decades has been a group interested in registering more voters. It's focused on the poor. It tends to hire people like homeless people, and other poor, to register voters.

It pays them by the registration, so sometimes the workers do wrong and submit phony registrations - they'll put in registrations for 'Mickey Mouse' or a bunch that they signed themselves, all with the same signature, to make a little extra money. *ACORN reviews every submitted registration form and researches every suspicious form*. ACORN supervisors make phone calls to verify the suspicious forms.

Now here's the kicker: ACORN is required by law to submit all the forms, no matter how obvious the problem. And so they break out the suspicous forms, and submit them as suspicious with the rest of the forms, because they have to. Republicans know they have to do this - and so they take advantage of it, by taking those forms submitted as suspicious, and then telling the media how they're proof of ACORN voter fraud.

(Some suspect the Republicans might even put people in as ACORN workers to submit some of the false forms, but it doesn't matter to the larger issue).

So, this is an outrageous lie by the Republicans. Their actual agenda is to *oppose* democracy by trying to minimize the number of new voters - mostly democratic - registered by making attacks they know are false against the group who is doing a great job at getting a lot of people registered.

Let's remember where the real corruption is - how the Bush administration pressured US Attorneys to file charges against ACORN for voter fraud, and when the US Attorneys did large investigations and found there were zero prosecutable cases from the investigations, the admnistration got rid of the Atorneys for refusing to file false prosecutions, behaving as the law should and does require.

Facts and truth will just make them even more desperate, Red.

Remember that they've been spending weeks trying to pin the housing bust on ACORN too, despite the fact that ACORN strongly fought against the toxic subprime aka "predatory" loans. Then when you point out to them how Bush pushed for all that subprime lending (especially to poor minorities) as part of his "Ownership Society" plan, and they freak out. Rush told them that weren't so! They have a 1999 NYT article about an obscure and discontinued Fannie program! And so forth.

The next book CAD should read: The Bush Betrayal by James Bovard

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it


ACORN for decades has been a group interested in registering more voters. It's focused on the poor. It tends to hire people like homeless people, and other poor, to register voters.

It pays them by the registration, so sometimes the workers do wrong and submit phony registrations - they'll put in registrations for 'Mickey Mouse' or a bunch that they signed themselves, all with the same signature, to make a little extra money. *ACORN reviews every submitted registration form and researches every suspicious form*. ACORN supervisors make phone calls to verify the suspicious forms.

Now here's the kicker: ACORN is required by law to submit all the forms, no matter how obvious the problem. And so they break out the suspicous forms, and submit them as suspicious with the rest of the forms, because they have to. Republicans know they have to do this - and so they take advantage of it, by taking those forms submitted as suspicious, and then telling the media how they're proof of ACORN voter fraud.

(Some suspect the Republicans might even put people in as ACORN workers to submit some of the false forms, but it doesn't matter to the larger issue).

So, this is an outrageous lie by the Republicans. Their actual agenda is to *oppose* democracy by trying to minimize the number of new voters - mostly democratic - registered by making attacks they know are false against the group who is doing a great job at getting a lot of people registered.

Let's remember where the real corruption is - how the Bush administration pressured US Attorneys to file charges against ACORN for voter fraud, and when the US Attorneys did large investigations and found there were zero prosecutable cases from the investigations, the admnistration got rid of the Atorneys for refusing to file false prosecutions, behaving as the law should and does require.

Facts and truth will just make them even more desperate, Red.

Remember that they've been spending weeks trying to pin the housing bust on ACORN too, despite the fact that ACORN strongly fought against the toxic subprime aka "predatory" loans. Then when you point out to them how Bush pushed for all that subprime lending (especially to poor minorities) as part of his "Ownership Society" plan, and they freak out. Rush told them that weren't so! They have a 1999 NYT article about an obscure and discontinued Fannie program! And so forth.

The next book CAD should read: The Bush Betrayal by James Bovard

Well you know what he's going to say, F'n apologist LOL :laugh::laugh::laugh:

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
No, the latest portion has you being repeatedly owned due to you not being able to read. If you would have kept your knee in check(hard for apologists) then you wouldn't have posted the repeated nonsense you did. You ASSumed and got caught repeatedly stuffing straw. You should have quit a long time ago...

I'm sorry, what was it I'm supposed to be apologizing for again? You're avoiding this question as well.

And speaking of not being able to read, I asked, what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's? Is there something about that wording that you don't understand? I didn't say "equal." That's you stuffing straw.

 

[sandorski]

I feel the ACORN RAGE! :|

Based on nonsense, but the rage! :|:|

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Hey if after the election if it can be proved that fraud due to ACORN was the reason Obama won I believe that a recall should be taken and if it turns out McCain would have won he should be given the nod.

What do the results have to do with this? Shouldn't these fraudulent activities be exposed and stopped regardless? Obviously ACORN can't/won't do it on their own despite their claims.

Isn't that what's happening now?

Is it being stopped? Seems to me ACORN and it's apologists are trying to dismiss the whole thing.

It's being exposed, that's the first step to stopping it. BTW did you read the post by Craig earlier in this thread? Well in case you missed it let me repost it


ACORN for decades has been a group interested in registering more voters. It's focused on the poor. It tends to hire people like homeless people, and other poor, to register voters.

It pays them by the registration, so sometimes the workers do wrong and submit phony registrations - they'll put in registrations for 'Mickey Mouse' or a bunch that they signed themselves, all with the same signature, to make a little extra money. *ACORN reviews every submitted registration form and researches every suspicious form*. ACORN supervisors make phone calls to verify the suspicious forms.

Now here's the kicker: ACORN is required by law to submit all the forms, no matter how obvious the problem. And so they break out the suspicous forms, and submit them as suspicious with the rest of the forms, because they have to. Republicans know they have to do this - and so they take advantage of it, by taking those forms submitted as suspicious, and then telling the media how they're proof of ACORN voter fraud.

(Some suspect the Republicans might even put people in as ACORN workers to submit some of the false forms, but it doesn't matter to the larger issue).

So, this is an outrageous lie by the Republicans. Their actual agenda is to *oppose* democracy by trying to minimize the number of new voters - mostly democratic - registered by making attacks they know are false against the group who is doing a great job at getting a lot of people registered.

Let's remember where the real corruption is - how the Bush administration pressured US Attorneys to file charges against ACORN for voter fraud, and when the US Attorneys did large investigations and found there were zero prosecutable cases from the investigations, the admnistration got rid of the Atorneys for refusing to file false prosecutions, behaving as the law should and does require.

Facts and truth will just make them even more desperate, Red.

Remember that they've been spending weeks trying to pin the housing bust on ACORN too, despite the fact that ACORN strongly fought against the toxic subprime aka "predatory" loans. Then when you point out to them how Bush pushed for all that subprime lending (especially to poor minorities) as part of his "Ownership Society" plan, and they freak out. Rush told them that weren't so! They have a 1999 NYT article about an obscure and discontinued Fannie program! And so forth.

The next book CAD should read: The Bush Betrayal by James Bovard

Move deflection and diversion... go figure...

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: sandorski
I feel the ACORN RAGE! :|

Based on nonsense, but the rage! :|:|

It's like they are breaking out the old Playbook from the 90's :laugh:

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Well you know what he's going to say, F'n apologist LOL :laugh::laugh::laugh:

You always know you've caught the wingnut in his lie when he pulls out the LOL :laugh:

I swear, they all do that exact same response when their spoonfed talking point is challenged in a way they haven't been given the answer to.

F'n pathetic is what I say.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Move deflection and diversion... go figure...

Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat. that's your standard answer when you are stumped..well that and "F'n apologists" :laugh:

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
No, the latest portion has you being repeatedly owned due to you not being able to read. If you would have kept your knee in check(hard for apologists) then you wouldn't have posted the repeated nonsense you did. You ASSumed and got caught repeatedly stuffing straw. You should have quit a long time ago...

I'm sorry, what was it I'm supposed to be apologizing for again? You're avoiding this question as well.

And speaking of not being able to read, I asked, what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's? Is there something about that wording that you don't understand? I didn't say "equal." That's you stuffing straw.

You're an apologist for BHO. It's quite obvious based on your posts here.

Again, I responded to a moron claiming they were equal. You jumped in with your nonsense. Can you really not see the difference between BHO's involvement with ACORN and McCain's? You can continue to toss up strawmen arguments but it doesn't make them any more relevant to the issue at hand. I responded to a diversion attempt and you took it and ran. Try to keep up here vic.

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: sandorski
I feel the ACORN RAGE! :|

Based on nonsense, but the rage! :|:|

It's like they are breaking out the old Playbook from the 90's :laugh:

Oh God, don't remind me. Clinton Derangement Syndrome is not something I want to live through again. Bush steals trillions from our govt, they're all good with it. Clinton gets a blowjob and OMFG...

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: sandorski
I feel the ACORN RAGE! :|

Based on nonsense, but the rage! :|:|

It's like they are breaking out the old Playbook from the 90's :laugh:

Yep, Randi Rhodes sure did...

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Move deflection and diversion... go figure...

Rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat. that's your standard answer when you are stumped..well that and "F'n apologists" :laugh:

No, I'm not stumped. It's the truth. You'd see it if you could look at this even semi-rationally.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

You're an apologist for BHO.

LOL standard canned answer.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

You're an apologist for BHO.

truth

Fixed.

 

[OrByte]

Originally posted by: sandorski
I feel the ACORN RAGE! :|

Based on nonsense, but the rage! :|:|

ACORNS!!! DAMNNATION!!!!


rraaaGGGGEEEEEE!! :|

 

[Vic]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
No, the latest portion has you being repeatedly owned due to you not being able to read. If you would have kept your knee in check(hard for apologists) then you wouldn't have posted the repeated nonsense you did. You ASSumed and got caught repeatedly stuffing straw. You should have quit a long time ago...

I'm sorry, what was it I'm supposed to be apologizing for again? You're avoiding this question as well.

And speaking of not being able to read, I asked, what about that involvement is MORE SERIOUS than McCain's? Is there something about that wording that you don't understand? I didn't say "equal." That's you stuffing straw.

You're an apologist for BHO. It's quite obvious based on your posts here.

Again, I responded to a moron claiming they were equal. You jumped in with your nonsense. Can you really not see the difference between BHO's involvement with ACORN and McCain's? You can continue to toss up strawmen arguments but it doesn't make them any more relevant to the issue at hand. I responded to a diversion attempt and you took it and ran. Try to keep up here vic.

My "nonsense" was a serious question. What makes Obama's involvement with ACORN more serious than McCain's? Assuming (as we are) that nothing illegal or unethical took place, then what is wrong here?

Likewise, what am I apologizing for? Obama's very existence or something? What is quite obvious based on my posts here is that morons like you flood these boards with pointless nonsense and partisan talking points and lies every fucking day and expect the rest of us to accept them at face value and without even questioning, just like you do. And when someone like myself, who absolutely NEVER accepts anything at face or without questioning, comes in and kicks the tires and find them flat (i.e your outrage and accusation are much ado about nothing, if not based on pathetically transparent lies), you freak out. OMG apologist!

If bucking your stupidity and hackery is being an apologist, then I'll wear that badge with pride, bitch.

 

[insurgent]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Ballatician

Originally posted by: OrByte
According to Malkin, McCain is in bed with corrupt, election stealing, economy tanking, baby eating ACORN too

:cries;

I wonder why there isn't any criticism of McCain's association with ACORN.

Maybe because this thread is about BHO and ACORN? Maybe because McCain sucks anyway and isn't lying about his association(slim as it may be).

So what's your bright idea? Vote for Ron Paul? You offer nothing of value, not one useful alternative other than bitch around.