No they did not.....here's the test up spec's....apparently you have problems reading-
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_970_SC_ACX_Cooler/5.html
"Test System - VGA Rev. 33
Processor: Intel Core i7-4770K @ 4.2 GHz
(Haswell, 8192 KB Cache)
Motherboard: ASUS Maximus VI Hero
Intel Z87
Memory: 16 GB DDR3
@ 1600 MHz 9-9-9-24
Harddisk: WD Caviar Blue WD10EZEX 1 TB
Power Supply: Antec HCP-1200 1200W
Software: Windows 7 64-bit Service Pack 1
Drivers: AMD: Catalyst 14.6 Beta
R9 285: 14.30 Beta 2
NVIDIA: 337.88 WHQL
GTX 970/980: 344.07
Display: LG Flatron W3000H 30" 2560x1600
3x Hanns.G HL225DBB 21.5" 1920x1080
Dell UP2414Q 24" 3840x2160"
"Benchmark scores in other reviews are only comparable when this exact same configuration is used.
All video card results are obtained on this exact system with exactly the same configuration.
All games are set to their highest quality setting unless indicated otherwise.
AA and AF are applied via in-game settings, not via the driver's control panel.
Each game is tested at the following settings and resolutions:
1600x900, 4x Anti-aliasing. Common resolution for most smaller flatscreens and laptops today (17" - 19").
1920x1080, 4x Anti-aliasing. Most common widescreen resolution for larger displays (22" - 26").
2560x1600, 4x Anti-aliasing. Highest possible resolution for commonly available displays (30").
5760x1080, 4x Anti-aliasing. Typical three-monitor high-end gaming multi-monitor resolution.
3840x2160, No Anti-aliasing. 4K Ultra HD resolution, available on the latest high-end monitors"
No 16x AA, no Tessellation....... you are pathetic.......they used the default Metro Benchmark setting as listed above.
Metro LL is one of the best sli performing games period for Nvidia, everyone knows this. Everything you've said is wrong Toyota, maybe you should stick to selling Toyotas.......