North African immigrants straining Europe's unity

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
I wouldn't be shocked at all if European governments are secretly killing the North African immigrants. The depths of European madness and bloodshed cannot be underestimated.
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Send those Tunisian hotties here

50553_17089813877_9619_n.jpg

If only. Its more likely all the ugly people are the ones who want to move to Europe. I say Europe should invade the country, breed with the females and enslave the males. Then all will be well.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
I wouldn't be shocked at all if European governments are secretly killing the North African immigrants. The depths of European madness and bloodshed cannot be underestimated.

yes we do, we have secret concentration camps and we eat their babies. Their own countries must be real sh*t because tens of thousands still try to get in every year.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
yes we do, we have secret concentration camps and we eat their babies. Their own countries must be real sh*t because tens of thousands still try to get in every year.

Secret concentration camps wouldn't be too surprising given European history. At the least, I wouldn't be surprised at all if European governments are sending people back to certain death despite true refugee status.

This even shows the European motivation in Libya - as has been said, it's purely for their own European agenda and not for any true humanitarian reasons. Beyond Libyan oil which Europeans are trying to secure for themselves, the Europeans will want to colonize Libya and ensure that no refugees make it out of there.

I'm not sure about the eating babies part though. Do you have a source for it?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Much of these North Africans are not immigrants but refugees. Many of the countries they come from have been destroyed through European colonialism.

And really, can the world afford a de-populated Europe? Europe extracted much of the world's resources through violence to build itself. Yet its population demographics are horrendous. These North Africans are the future Europeans who can use those resources. It's good for the environment. They will also likely bring stability and peace to a continent that has become associated with genocide and destruction.

How France in particular can take this position is amazing considering the scandal regarding the corruption of their former foreign minister with the Tunisian dictator regime. They also offered training and aid to be used to massacre Tunisian civilians. They're just pandering to the far-right, especially given the recent poll numbers for Marine Le Pen's far-right racist party.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,912
4,890
136
Much of these North Africans are not immigrants but refugees. Many of the countries they come from have been destroyed through European colonialism.

And really, can the world afford a de-populated Europe? Europe extracted much of the world's resources through violence to build itself. Yet its population demographics are horrendous. These North Africans are the future Europeans who can use those resources. It's good for the environment. They will also likely bring stability and peace to a continent that has become associated with genocide and destruction.

How France in particular can take this position is amazing considering the scandal regarding the corruption of their former foreign minister with the Tunisian dictator regime. They also offered training and aid to be used to massacre Tunisian civilians. They're just pandering to the far-right, especially given the recent poll numbers for Marine Le Pen's far-right racist party.

Good analysis...
Indeed, some european leaders are playing the invasion myth
as a covert to hide their incompetence in reforming an economy
that struggle to get out of the red for about 20 years, thanks
to capitalists practices that ended suppressing any real concurrence.

Consumers by there are nothing else that some cannon fodder,
screwed by big monopoles which do insane margins,
such as cell phone nets that do a comfortable 40% NET margin....
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
Good analysis...
Indeed, some european leaders are playing the invasion myth
as a covert to hide their incompetence in reforming an economy
that struggle to get out of the red for about 20 years, thanks
to capitalists practices that ended suppressing any real concurrence.

Consumers by there are nothing else that some cannon fodder,
screwed by big monopoles which do insane margins,
such as cell phone nets that do a comfortable 40% NET margin....

What are you rambling about? It's not like the politicians are fabricating this story. Illegals are trying to immigrate to wealthy countries. According to posters like CanOWorms (who has never been able to explain why third worlders would continue to move to a continent that he claims is bent on killing them) European countries have a duty to accept unlimited refugees because of past colonialism. Of course he would never suggest that North Africa has a duty to compensate southern Europe for the Moors' atrocities there.

North Africans need to stop making excuses. The rest of the world is developing and democratizing. It's their own fault they can't do it themselves and its perverse that they want to export their failure to Europe.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,912
4,890
136
North Africans need to stop making excuses. The rest of the world is developing and democratizing. It's their own fault they can't do it themselves and its perverse that they want to export their failure to Europe.

As pointed, their failure was first imposed on them...
Thanks to french rule, part of north africa had a
literacy rate of a few % when they gained their
independance, with no industrial tradition, nor
scientific knowledge, and about 1 ENGINEER for 500 000 PEOPLE,
with western nation looting the human ressources,
since at least 300 000 HIGH LEVEL people
were lured to go to theses nations since the
north africa independance..

The US started his devellopement 150 years ago, dont
forget that nothing came overnight...
 

Infohawk

Lifer
Jan 12, 2002
17,844
1
0
As pointed, their failure was first imposed on them...
Thanks to french rule, part of north africa had a
literacy rate of a few % when they gained their
independance, with no industrial tradition, nor
scientific knowledge, and about 1 ENGINEER for 500 000 PEOPLE,
with western nation looting the human ressources,
since at least 150 000 HIGH LEVEL people
were lured to go to theses nations...

The US started his devellopement 150 years ago, dont
forget that nothing came overnight...

All humans have been developing for millenia. It's so frequent for people to cherry-pick historical periods and claim they had an unfair start. You can say North Africa should have been more advanced because of all their contacts with the middle-east and Asia. You can say the Europeans were at a disadvantage because the plague destroyed their population. At the end of the day it's useless to bring that up. Countries in East Asia have made the best of bad situations. North Africa is still behind. Even recently they are still protesting because of a Coptic governor in Egypt. That's nobody else's fault but their own.

Do you not think Europeans should be allowed to control their borders and decide who comes in and who doesn't? (I know CanOWorms doesn't but he also thinks that Churchill was a worse criminal than Hitler so he's not really worth attention.)
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,912
4,890
136
All humans have been developing for millenia. It's so frequent for people to cherry-pick historical periods and claim they had an unfair start. You can say North Africa should have been more advanced because of all their contacts with the middle-east and Asia. You can say the Europeans were at a disadvantage because the plague destroyed their population. At the end of the day it's useless to bring that up. Countries in East Asia have made the best of bad situations. North Africa is still behind. Even recently they are still protesting because of a Coptic governor in Egypt. That's nobody else's fault but their own.

Do you not think Europeans should be allowed to control their borders and decide who comes in and who doesn't? (I know CanOWorms doesn't but he also thinks that Churchill was a worse criminal than Hitler so he's not really worth attention.)

Border control is a sovereignty matter, and each country is
free to do whatever policy she choose...

As for devellopement, things are not simple since western
countries are preventing any technological transfer to these
countries, and if they manage to devellop an embryon
of know how, they are either destroyed like Iraq or heavily
bullyied to stop their course as is done with Iran...

The asians nations you are boasting about, all made
tech. transfers without being stopped by the western
neo colonisators, and were rather helped.

Japan, though, started its industrial revolution
150 years ago under Mitsu Hito s Meiji reign...

As for Churchill, yes, he was a racist and fascist
that said that "superior races are allowed to use
mortal gas against inferior ones".....
 
Last edited:

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,912
4,890
136
If only. Its more likely all the ugly people are the ones who want to move to Europe. I say Europe should invade the country, breed with the females and enslave the males. Then all will be well.

Mister fascist, you can only dream about it....
He would not be a man if he let neo colonisators
put their dirt on such beauties....

Mona-Abou-Hamzeh.jpg
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
As for Churchill, yes, he was a racist and fascist
that said that "superior races are allowed to use
mortal gas against inferior ones".....

There's no point arguing with that guy. He's the forum holocaust denier.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Secret concentration camps wouldn't be too surprising given European history. At the least, I wouldn't be surprised at all if European governments are sending people back to certain death despite true refugee status.

This even shows the European motivation in Libya - as has been said, it's purely for their own European agenda and not for any true humanitarian reasons. Beyond Libyan oil which Europeans are trying to secure for themselves, the Europeans will want to colonize Libya and ensure that no refugees make it out of there.

I'm not sure about the eating babies part though. Do you have a source for it?

you must be confused, the last torture concentration camps were from the CIA to torture Afghans. Torture was accepted on the highest level of US policy, even Bush said that torture was an accepted method of interrogation so I think you have your continents mixed up which is normal, geography is not really a strong point of a lot of Americans
 

ConstipatedVigilante

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2006
7,670
1
0
not with all our troops in the middle east.

and wtf wants to immigrate to china aside from koreans?
Koreans, Burmese, Laosians, Cambodians, and Bangladeshians. China has jobs and a government that only hurts you if you do something against it.

Uighurs are a major problem for the CCP as well.


And we still have lots of troops at home. If the government weren't such a goddamn failure, we could send National Guardsmen/women to the border, set up motion detection systems and cameras, lay barbed wire, etc. There is an invasion from Mexico and it needs to be stopped. We have the most powerful military force that the world has ever seen and we can't secure the border? Give me a fucking break.
 

RocksteadyDotNet

Diamond Member
Jul 29, 2008
3,152
1
0
FYI most of those North Africans are white.

LOL. No, they're not white.

They're Arabs. Arabs aren't white. Not buy a long fucking way. They only wish they were white.

Anyone east of Hungary isn't really white in my book. Not proper, master race, white anyway.
 
Aug 14, 2001
11,061
0
0
you must be confused, the last torture concentration camps were from the CIA to torture Afghans. Torture was accepted on the highest level of US policy, even Bush said that torture was an accepted method of interrogation so I think you have your continents mixed up which is normal, geography is not really a strong point of a lot of Americans

No, I'm not confused. Even in recent history, Europeans were committing genocide and, of course, the US had to step in to stop it.

The world is watching Europe. We're all sick of your god damned ethnic cleansing.