OP rants on nookular. TLC erroneously claims M/W lists and accepts it as the second pronunication.
Not only is it a weak rant, it's an uninformed one.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nuclear
Notice the second accepted pronunciation?
I show TLC how completely wrong he is, using the IPA symbols M/W uses for the second pronunciation to prove that second listed pronunciation " ˈnyü-, ÷-kyə-lər"
categorically isn't "nook u lar":
ˈnyü- /= noo
kyə /= u
lər /= lar .
Another poster chimes in that he listened to the audio of both (you need, ugh, Quick Time), and CLEARLY
neither is "nookular."
LOL, TLC in his last quote below reaches DEEP into his rectum and claims, and I quote, "All Merriam-Webster has for pronunciations of nuclear are a male and female rendition of the
primary pronunciation."
The BULLSHITTING little dimwit 'tard! He
thinks this is so because M/W's audio files randomly use accepted pronunciations from both sexes. Indeed, the second audio clip corresponds to the second accepted pronunciaton, " ˈnyü-, ÷-kyə-lər", which I confirm (as if I needed to, but I did) by fucking downloading QT and listening for myself!
Anyway, before he claims this in his last weak-ass load of bullshit, he posts and claims:
lol. The second pronunciation is essentially nookular, nucular, nukyaler, or however you want to spell it out, dipshit. Stop trying to be such an assinine pedant based on a spelling when everyone else already knows what specific pronunciation we are talking about.
Sheesh, fucking moron.
Notice the bolded, even after I showed him the IPA pronunciation " ˈnyü-, ÷-kyə-lər" which even a DIMWIT that doesn't know the pronunciation guide can SEE has a fucking '
Y' in the very first syllable!!!!!
SO HE LIES AND SHIFTS HIS ASS IN HIS LAST POST. Having been caught, he now attempts to sneak a
'Y' into his claim.
You have only to compare the bolded above with the bolded below to catch him in his attempted
LIE.
Ahhh, but he exposes his ignorance even harder below. What an ASS!
Look at the further below where he say, and I quote, "If you don't believe me I would suggest that you don't rely on a few written symbols."
LOLOLOLOLOL, those "few written symbols came straight from that Merriam Webster's page:
Pronunciation Symbols
I even told him so:
Christ, man, RIGHT ON THAT MERRIAM-WEBSTER PAGE is a pronunciation symbol guide you can click on:
Oh lord.
All Merriam-Webster has for pronunciations of nuclear are a male and female rendition of the
primary pronunciation.
The second, alternative pronunciation, if spoken as they have it indicated symbolically would be - nyoo-kya-lar. If you don't believe me
I would suggest that you don't rely on a few written symbols. Instead you should refer to the following which M-W provides on their website to fully explain the usage of their pronunciation symbology:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/help/mwol-pronunciation-guide.pdf
Come back after you've learned something you arrogant jackass.
Tastes Like Chicken, you have been so thoroughly busted and exposed as herein practicing the troll trifecta of bullshit, outright dececption, and dumbassery that it is EPIC.
Cliffs:
OP complains about nookular.
TLC claims M/W lists it as its second acceptable pronunciation. It doesn't.
Challenged, TLC claims the M/W IPA pronunciation " ˈnyü-, ÷-kyə-lər" IS pronounced "nook u lar." It isn't.
Shown he's wrong by the audio pronunciation of the second listing, TCL tries to claim M/W always provides a male and a female version of the SAME pronunciation. They don't. They
never do.
Caught flat out that ˈnyü is NOT pronounced noo, TLC tries to change his claim from one post to the next but is caught red handed.
Assorted other "pulled right out of his anus" BS proves TLC is something of an insistent boob.
/Cliffs
Thank you and good night.