soulcougher73
Lifer
- Nov 29, 2006
- 15,823
- 4,356
- 136
So since he is opposed to discrimination against groups liberals care about he is opposed to discrimination.
Got it.
The fail is strong with this one.
So since he is opposed to discrimination against groups liberals care about he is opposed to discrimination.
Got it.
I'm 64% Irish and 33% French; my wife is 44% Irish and 56% French. Clearly we have enough between us to be married. Or are we screwed? (Well if we are then at least we're screwing)
You all are replying to n256?
Hasn't he proven to be a recalcitrant spam troll already?
The Top 8 Ways To Be 'Traditionally Married' According To The Bible
http://www.upworthy.com/the-top-8-ways-to-be-traditionally-married-according-to-the-bible?g=2&c=la2
man could acquire his wife's property including her slaves
No what we need to do is untangle your interpretation of marriage from religion. Marriage is not a religious construct. They mearly adapted it to their beliefs. It existed long before the bible.
I see you still haven't grasped it yet. It's okay. Not everyone is born average.
So lets see. We can either force people to accept something that discriminates other people or we can force people to accept something that doesnt discriminate other people . Tough call.
Do you understand that having rational standards is the foundation of worthwhile opinions? He's not tolerant to a fault. He's rationally tolerant of things that don't impose on his freedom and further, he champions the freedoms of others in the face of irrational bigotry.
In the US, marriage was clearly a religious institution long before the government violated the Constitution by putting the force of law behind it.
This is easily proven, do you need to me prove people were married in the States prior to the formation of the United States Government?
No, it's a special right. Women simply have control over their bodies, you want men to have a special extra right in addition to having control over their bodies. This is not hard to understand, so I'm not sure what you aren't grasping.
Well to borrow liberal logic from this thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2246053&page=6
Gay people are asking for a new special right. Society is not obligated to it to them right?
You're free to get gay married.Gay people are asking for a new special right. Society is not obligated to it to them right?
No, you ridiculous idiot. Same sex marriage would be open to everyone. Equality for all.
Everyone is already free to get a heterosexual marriage. Equality for all :thumbsup:
Everyone is already free to get a heterosexual marriage. Equality for all :thumbsup:
Do you need to have proved that people were married in native American cultures and that the US government was formed with a decent basis on the Six Nations of the Iriquois Confederacy? You're wrong here. Like in pretty much everything you talk about on his forum.
I'm glad to see that it only took you two posts to realize the point you were trying to make was retarded this time. Gay people are not asking for special rights, they are asking for all people to have the same right to marry the person of their choosing. Truly, equality for all.
Hilarious. Next up, you're going to be convincing us that women's suffrage is a special right. Good one brah.Yes they are. They want same-sex marriage to exist. That is a special right.
That's the same argument that was used when interracial marriage was fought against. "Everyone is free to get a heterosexual marriage with someone of the same race". Marriage equality would be that two consenting adults are free to get married.
Hilarious. Next up, you're going to be convincing us that women's suffrage is a special right. Good one brah.
![]()
Yes they are. They want same-sex marriage to exist. That is a special right.
I have to disagree with your criticism of rchiu's very valid argument.
Gays can NOT be allowed to marry until they demonstrate their marriages last.
Go for it, show the US Government was formed based on the Six Nations of the Iriquios Confederacy.
Well to borrow liberal logic from this thread:
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2246053&page=6
Gay people are asking for a new special right. Society is not obligated to it to them right?
I'll have to check my bible to see if there's some special dispensation you may be entitled to but suspect that if you are it will require some amount of penance...
Back... It seems that in Numbers there is some reference to Dudeyou'reontome where it speaks to Genesister and some Giants who slept with some chicks... They, the giants, were Irish and from some gay place called Frisco. The chicks, it appears, are the result of the entire town being populated by Adam, Eve and Cain... Six vowels and five constanents in three names beget words like Nicea, Ma and a Dave... WE all know Dave is a bit out of it so... we're left with Nicea and Ma where Constantine Proclaimed Gallic The language of Rome... Now in Gallic some words are the same as the old Latin but have different meanings... Ma historically meant Gay sex.. and Since Gay sex can't make babies they labeled folks created by those giants again.. as Irish...
You could be more Irish than and probably are more that the figures you calculated indicate.
IF you are screwing as you say... You must be Irish and Irish enough to screw.
Edit: The French bit was just a Justification cuz it fit my situation and God loves me and stuff so he said it was ok... but only in America...