Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
I hope you all notice it's not embryonic stem cells.
Originally posted by: ericlp
Ya know... I can't keep track of all of bush's fuck ups. We need to a book on all the idiotic decisions this asshole has made...
Other then that! Excellent news and should have and "COULD" have been in the news four years early if we didn't have a fucking moron running the country.
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Originally posted by: ericlp
Ya know... I can't keep track of all of bush's fuck ups. We need to a book on all the idiotic decisions this asshole has made...
Other then that! Excellent news and should have and "COULD" have been in the news four years early if we didn't have a fucking moron running the country.
I don't understand how this story has anything to do with Bush.
Are you sure? Every university has an ethics review board that must approve all potentially objectionable research. Many journals require studies to follow their prescribed protocols for the treatment of human cadaver tissue and even animal tissues. Some areas of research should undoubtedly be shut down. For example, I've yet to hear an ethicist accept that reproductive human cloning should be allowed.Originally posted by: magomago
good news, we must never shut down avenues of research.
Originally posted by: Duwelon
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Originally posted by: ericlp
Ya know... I can't keep track of all of bush's fuck ups. We need to a book on all the idiotic decisions this asshole has made...
Other then that! Excellent news and should have and "COULD" have been in the news four years early if we didn't have a fucking moron running the country.
I don't understand how this story has anything to do with Bush.
Bush Derangement Syndrom. They're too far gone to even attempt to figure them out anymore.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Yeah it's more ethical to use your tax dollars to kill humans than it is to save them.Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Because a huge percentage of the population finds it unethical. Because embryonic stem cells are not proven to be any more effective than regular stem cells.
If people want to privately fund it then so be it. I do not want my tax dollars paying for something I feel is unethical.
Originally posted by: magomago
good news, we must never shut down avenues of research.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah it's more ethical to use your tax dollars to kill humans than it is to save them.Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Because a huge percentage of the population finds it unethical. Because embryonic stem cells are not proven to be any more effective than regular stem cells.
If people want to privately fund it then so be it. I do not want my tax dollars paying for something I feel is unethical.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
Are you sure? Every university has an ethics review board that must approve all potentially objectionable research. Many journals require studies to follow their prescribed protocols for the treatment of human cadaver tissue and even animal tissues. Some areas of research should undoubtedly be shut down. For example, I've yet to hear an ethicist accept that reproductive human cloning should be allowed.Originally posted by: magomago
good news, we must never shut down avenues of research.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Because a huge percentage of the population finds it unethical. Because embryonic stem cells are not proven to be any more effective than regular stem cells.
If people want to privately fund it then so be it. I do not want my tax dollars paying for something I feel is unethical.[/Q]Yeah it's more ethical to use your tax dollars to kill humans than it is to save them.
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah it's more ethical to use your tax dollars to kill humans than it is to save them.Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Because a huge percentage of the population finds it unethical. Because embryonic stem cells are not proven to be any more effective than regular stem cells.
If people want to privately fund it then so be it. I do not want my tax dollars paying for something I feel is unethical.
If you're referring to the war I don't have much to say on that. With the evidence we had at that time it was the right thing to do. With the evidence we have now it was not.
That's not what I said. I said that some avenues of research should be shut down if they are deemed unethical by those who govern such things. I gave one unrelated example that every ethicist seems to agree on: reproductive cloning. I'm not saying that reproductive cloning will arise from stem cell research or even that stem cell research is unethical - I'm just using it as the most obvious example of something that should not be allowed due to ethical considerations.Originally posted by: magomago
Hmm I guess I was saying that in reference to this topic ie: what type of stem cells can be researched on. I suppose everything has to go through the IRB and like you said that is where a lot of the ethical considerations come in, but we shouldn't kid ourselves and think we are at the stage of reproducing an entire human. A lot of stem cell research is still getting down basic concepts, and even in cases where we have primitive "organs" or even more "Advanced ones" (Anthony Atala and his crazy work with Kidneys come to mind) we aren't sure what exact mechanisms are taking place.
I disagree. Once the information is available, those with less concern for ethical applications will surely use them. If we accumulate knowledge that can only be used to do something unethical, then chances are the accumulation of that knowledge is also unethical, even if it is only because it is a means to enable an unethical end.Learning the information to me should (almost) never be banned - it always the application of that information that we need to consider....and for quite a while now and for the foreseeable future we are still simply accumulating knowledge and learning which is why I stated (although I shouldn't have made it an absolute - buts its very close to it) that we shouldn't be shutting off avenues of research because it accumulates knowledge and the increase of knowledge is (absolutely
) NEVER a bad thing.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
That's not what I said. I said that some avenues of research should be shut down if they are deemed unethical by those who govern such things. I gave one unrelated example that every ethicist seems to agree on: reproductive cloning. I'm not saying that reproductive cloning will arise from stem cell research or even that stem cell research is unethical - I'm just using it as the most obvious example of something that should not be allowed due to ethical considerations.Originally posted by: magomago
Hmm I guess I was saying that in reference to this topic ie: what type of stem cells can be researched on. I suppose everything has to go through the IRB and like you said that is where a lot of the ethical considerations come in, but we shouldn't kid ourselves and think we are at the stage of reproducing an entire human. A lot of stem cell research is still getting down basic concepts, and even in cases where we have primitive "organs" or even more "Advanced ones" (Anthony Atala and his crazy work with Kidneys come to mind) we aren't sure what exact mechanisms are taking place.
I disagree. Once the information is available, those with less concern for ethical applications will surely use them. If we accumulate knowledge that can only be used to do something unethical, then chances are the accumulation of that knowledge is also unethical, even if it is only because it is a means to enable an unethical end.Learning the information to me should (almost) never be banned - it always the application of that information that we need to consider....and for quite a while now and for the foreseeable future we are still simply accumulating knowledge and learning which is why I stated (although I shouldn't have made it an absolute - buts its very close to it) that we shouldn't be shutting off avenues of research because it accumulates knowledge and the increase of knowledge is (absolutely
) NEVER a bad thing.
Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah it's more ethical to use your tax dollars to kill humans than it is to save them.Originally posted by: ZeroIQ
Originally posted by: jpeyton
What's wrong with embryonic stem cell research again?
You guys do realize we take tens of thousands of embryos, crush their skulls and throw them in the dumpsters every year right?
Why not put them to good use instead of turning them into maggot food?
Because a huge percentage of the population finds it unethical. Because embryonic stem cells are not proven to be any more effective than regular stem cells.
If people want to privately fund it then so be it. I do not want my tax dollars paying for something I feel is unethical.
If you're referring to the war I don't have much to say on that. With the manufactured, cherry picked evidence we had at that time it was the right thing to do. With the evidence we have now it was not.
Originally posted by: CycloWizard
That's not what I said. I said that some avenues of research should be shut down if they are deemed unethical by those who govern such things. I gave one unrelated example that every ethicist seems to agree on: reproductive cloning. I'm not saying that reproductive cloning will arise from stem cell research or even that stem cell research is unethical - I'm just using it as the most obvious example of something that should not be allowed due to ethical considerations.Originally posted by: magomago
Hmm I guess I was saying that in reference to this topic ie: what type of stem cells can be researched on. I suppose everything has to go through the IRB and like you said that is where a lot of the ethical considerations come in, but we shouldn't kid ourselves and think we are at the stage of reproducing an entire human. A lot of stem cell research is still getting down basic concepts, and even in cases where we have primitive "organs" or even more "Advanced ones" (Anthony Atala and his crazy work with Kidneys come to mind) we aren't sure what exact mechanisms are taking place.
I disagree. Once the information is available, those with less concern for ethical applications will surely use them. If we accumulate knowledge that can only be used to do something unethical, then chances are the accumulation of that knowledge is also unethical, even if it is only because it is a means to enable an unethical end.[/quote]Learning the information to me should (almost) never be banned - it always the application of that information that we need to consider....and for quite a while now and for the foreseeable future we are still simply accumulating knowledge and learning which is why I stated (although I shouldn't have made it an absolute - buts its very close to it) that we shouldn't be shutting off avenues of research because it accumulates knowledge and the increase of knowledge is (absolutely
) NEVER a bad thing.