Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Originally posted by: Armitage
I'm with you on everything but the peanut butter thing. Some people have peanut allergies that are extremely serious and potentially deadly and can be triggered be even very small amounts - like a crumb left on the table that gets on the allergic kids food.
My son's daycare bans all nut products because a child there has severe peanut allergies. The staff has been trained to administer epi syringes that are kept on hand. My daughters elementary school sets aside a table in the cafeteria for any kids that have peanut butter. Sad ... but that's a very real and potentially deadly risk.
Sorry, but I disagree.
i do not think that an entire school of children should be denied something like peanut butter because of ONE kid. I think the parents need to a) teach their kid to NEVER EVER eat anything that did not come from home, b) go to a private school or c) home school.
I cannot see how it is fair that no child is allowed to have something as normal as peanut butter because of one kid. I think it is the responsibility of the parents to ensure the safety of their kid in such a situation. I dont think that hundreds of kids should suffer because of one kid.
Hard ass stance, I know.
So denial of peanut butter for lunch = suffering? Have your peanut butter somewhere else - I don't see it as that much of a hardship. And I love peanut butter. Compared to a kid that could possibly DIE if they accidently came into contact with it.
It's not a matter of teaching the kid not to eat anything from home. They don't have to actually eat it - simply coming in contact with it can be enough ... like the crumb on the table thing. Besides, you have kids. How well do kindergarteners listen? Maybe by middle or high school that will work, but not daycare & elementary school.
I see it as a very minor inconvenience to help avoid potentially deadly consequences. Compared to the rest of you list where the "consequences" are entirely imagined or the OP subject where the restriction is entirely unreasonable compared to the risk.