"No more pins" article

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
i feel so stupid. i posted the same thing... only after you did... =P
 

crazyjoekuta

Senior member
Sep 3, 2000
543
0
0
ok, my stupid a$$ just bought an amd thunderbird 700 on e-bay for $140, thinking "it won't have missing pins!". well, to my wonderfull delight, the seller tells me it is indeed missing the pins! fun! fun! fun!
So, does anyone think i might be able to overclock it sometime soon (is it possible to override those missing pins? if so, would someone maybe be making a product to do this???? i'm guessing the demand will be great). i know my questions are probably not answerable, but i am just finding out if i should put the processor back for bid on e-bay as soon as i get it (annoying) and search for a replacement WITH pins.
would overclockerz.com still have unlocked processors for sale?
i am SORRY for running on like this, but i'm really pissed off! i'm so stupid!
joe
 

Toonces311

Member
Jun 19, 2000
124
0
0
Dude, don't worry. All of the pictures with the missing pins are fakes. These "hardware" sites are posting them trying to get noticed. It has not been confirmed that there are any Tbird/Durons with missing pins.

Your chip probably has the L2 bridges cut. Don't worry either because you can solve that little problem with a pencil.
 

crazyjoekuta

Senior member
Sep 3, 2000
543
0
0
ok, that is reassuring. however, i sent a link of that site (http://www.insanehardware.com/scoopage/amdpinless/) to the guy that i bought the cpu from, and he replied: "I checked out that website (insanehardware) it appears the processor is
missing those pins. So maybe can't be overclocked."
I guess only time will tell.........
he sends it out on monday, i'll let you guys know if AMD has finally done it!
thanks for the reply!
joe
 

IaPuP

Golden Member
Mar 3, 2000
1,186
0
0
Toonces,

The original report of missing pins was supplied in a *private* email from Soltek.

This is about as reliable a source as you're going to find. they weren't looking for publicity. I agree that I'm not *totally* sure that this is a 'real' pin-less CPU, but I would have to believe that there *are* *some* out there.

Eric
 

MadRat

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
11,999
307
126
We have alot of paranoia out there. AMD promised to lock the processor. They did.
AMD never to my knowledge promised to yank pins off the cpu, nor have they said
that their current locking scheme was inadequate. The current locking scheme may
be the long-term scheme they've already promised!

AFA anyone knows the missing pins socket-A cpu is an urban legend.
 

Techwhore

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2000
1,248
0
0
I don't understand y AMD or any chip maker would discourage overclocking... the amount of people who actaully do overclock is not significant at all... i think it's all just a ploy for AMD to make more money, if they really didn't want people to overclock, they wouldn't add things like that 40 pin connector on the athlon classic or the golden bridges on the duron/tbird... no matter what they do, someone's gonna come out with something to make it overclock. The the 40 pin connector on the original athlon was weird... i mean, it's inside the casing so you're not supposed to know it's there, then somebody just randomly decides to crack the casing open and poke around inside only to discover these pins. Not only that, but this person then decides to solder the pins in all sorts of combinations and discovers that it unlocks the core! I don't know, I think AMD is making a side market out of overclocking. They must be taking cuts :)
 

Mday

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
18,647
1
81
because it cuts into their profits directly. as well as causes a hell of a warrantee issue as well as the ease at which some people can alter and sell them higher without the customers' knowledge (as in fakes). that last part makes no sense to multiplier locked processors.
 

Topher

Golden Member
Oct 10, 1999
1,264
0
0
You can still overclock the processor even without the pins. It is much more involved however and involves running wires from the resistors on the top of the processor. Not for the faint-hearted.