No more cowardice and appeasement

[railer]

I'm loving how the dimwits throw the phrase "typical liberal" around, when I'm sure that 98% of people in here don't even know what a liberal or conservative is. Being liberal has nothing to do with your willingness to use force in conflict (go ahead look it up). Liberals (in general) do not favor military expansionism, but that does not mean that "they" (whoever the f "they" are, as if they're a different breed or something) don't favor a strong military.
I guess if you're a Bush fan, you have to lump people into 2 categories: good and evil, right and wrong, liberal and conservative, etc., etc. etc.

The fact of the matter is, most Americans (hell most PEOPLE anywhere) are going to have both liberal and conservative tendancies, depending on they're current economic and emotional state. Only the nuts and crackpots are going to willingly lump themselves into some fringe group. One of the most hilarious ideas that some knuckleheads who "think" that they're conservative have is the notion that "they" (conservatives) believe in "personal responsibility", while the rest of the world somehow does not. Like liberals DON'T believe in personal responsibility at all. Like liberals think everyone should be lazy and on wellfare, and that's the way the world should be, and everything would be fine that way. Duh. Sometimes I wish I could drop my IQ 50 points so these stupid and simplistic ideas would appeal to me. I'd probably like Bush a lot better then too. Maybe I'll start smoking weed....

 

[railer]

Oh yea.....

....if you don't support war you must be a coward....right.

That's not a simple minded notion at all.....

Nope...

Nothing stupid about that statement....

 

[lowtech1]

Originally posted by: tm37

Originally posted by: HendrixFan

Originally posted by: Riprorin

Originally posted by: stevens
This war is so asinine. In no way what so ever can you compare Hitler Germany to present day Iraq. Bush has gathered no hard evidence that Iraq has anything. It?s all hear-say. He is trying to take action for 9-11, but he can?t find Osama, so he picks a name that is synonymous with evil as to take some sort of actions against evil as to save his failing presidency. He is using war to draw attention away from our horrible economy. BUT there are countries that we have hard evidence of their wrong doings (i.e. North Korea) but he takes no actions against them. IMO these aggression wars accomplish nothing. The reason why Clinton didn?t remove Sadam is because the militant extremist that would have replaced him were even worse. War sucks. I couldn?t disagree more with Bush?s decision. I just feel that this war is hurried and that it is going more events like 9-11. Please don?t take this personally. This is just my opinion.

Have you informed yourself on this issue at all?

Saddam was supposed to disarm 12 YEARS AGO. 12 years and 17 UN RESOLUTIONS LATER, he still has not disarmed.

Time for negotiatons are OVER!!!!

Bye, bye Saddam.

I dont remember the UN Inspectors coming to that conclusion. In fact, I remember Iraq getting a "B" most recently; and this past week there was news of anthrax that had been shown to have been destroyed.

The Bush Administration has said that Iraq has the burden of proof showing they have disarmed. The UN doesnt ask that, because its proving a negative, very difficult to do. The US knows Iraq cant prove they have disarmed by any means other than the inspectors, which is why they dont want the inspectors to spend their time proving Iraq right.

What you fail to realize is that ANything less than full coperation is a MATIERAL BREACH.

The way These inspections are supposed to take place is The iraqi leader LEAD the Inspectors to were the weapons are and distroy them OR show them How they distroyed them. Saddam's declaration claimed they had NOTHING to declare. Yet they keep finding bits and pieces.

How inspections are supposed to work.

iraqi leader - Here are our weapons please help us distroy them.
UN inspector- OK.

How iraqi inspection have worked.

iraqi leader - we don't have anything
UN inspector - what about these
iraqi leader- yeah about that

Blix has stated that Iraq has better documentation than any other arab country and rivals that of the western world. Saddams werapons programs were very well controlled yet now when the day for disarmerment comes they have no idea what they have? COme on and wake up you really can't be that naive.

And, who make the US judge & jury of the world. It sound more and more like self proclaim Fuhrer.