imported_Shivetya
Platinum Member
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Ugh, this has been gone over before. Can you show me why failing schools track extremely closely with income levels? Poor areas being way way way more likely to have failing schools then rich ones?
Do you believe this is because poor areas are bad at hiring teachers and administrators and so get lots of bad ones that mess up their schools? Or maybe there is another reason to it.... one that has been mentioned many times before on here... about the socioeconomic climate in which low income students grow up in that does not value education.
I'm sure it's probably those damn teacher's unions though. If they would stop asking for raises, we could use that extra money to brainwash the kids into loving school!
It is the teachers unions. You want to know why, because they work the same way in every state. My coworker's wife is a teacher, with tenure. She can turn down ANY school she does not work in. Hence new teachers are more than likely to go to the "bad" schools. Worse, there is NO INCENTIVE to go work in these bad schools as the adminstrators will not stand up for the teachers versus the parents. All the union does is turn away. They don't encourage extra pay for teachers going to these schools as they are all about senority. Rotten teachers stay in the system because of the same unions.
All these schools are funded nearly equally... so whats the issue with NCLB being blamed?