Nissan struggling with Quest minivan's slow sales, quality issues

BigSmooth

Lifer
Aug 18, 2000
10,484
12
81
Those problems don't exactly seem catastrophic, but they certainly aren't helping. Nissan must be looking at their sales goals and wondering what they were smoking that day.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
Much better than the previous Quest .. that used to sell like 200-400 a month. This one sells around 4,000.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: Aimster
Much better than the previous Quest .. that used to sell like 200-400 a month. This one sells around 4,000.

??? maybe im not awake yet, but i dont understand what you are saying.
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
The exterior is pleasant but the interior is horrendous. Same goes for that Infiniti QX56.
QX56 = Most obvious penile compensation vehicle to date.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?
 

Doggiedog

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
12,780
5
81
Originally posted by: Fausto
Originally posted by: Doggiedog
The exterior is pleasant but the interior is horrendous. Same goes for that Infiniti QX56.
QX56 = Most obvious penile compensation vehicle to date.

Agreed. That is probably one of the most obnoxious vehicles on the road. Even worse than the Excursion IMO.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?

Based on experience with Chassis/Mechanical/Engine performance and longevity of the Nissans compared to comparable domestic Products and said death rate of them.
 

CraigRT

Lifer
Jun 16, 2000
31,440
5
0
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?

I somewhat agree with Dave, but the initial quality does blow on these things..
 

BigSmooth

Lifer
Aug 18, 2000
10,484
12
81
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Aimster
Much better than the previous Quest .. that used to sell like 200-400 a month. This one sells around 4,000.

??? maybe im not awake yet, but i dont understand what you are saying.

Basically, even though the new Quest is not meeting Nissan's stated goals, it's still blowing away the sales of the old Quest.
 

RagingBITCH

Lifer
Sep 27, 2003
17,618
2
76
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?

Based on experience with Chassis/Mechanical/Engine performance and longevity of the Nissans compared to comparable domestic Products and said death rate of them.

Well if this new Quest is anything like any Nissan some of my friends have ever owned, or anyone in my family, initial quality is certainly a tell tale sign of longterm quality IMO. We've had horrid luck with them in the past and these problems certainly don't make me want to go out and buy one.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
Nissan spokesman Kyle Bazemore says the recall is mainly a response to the Quest's poor showing in the 2004 J.D. Power and Associates Initial Quality Study. The April survey rated the Quest last among minivans in consumer perceptions of quality during the first 100 days of ownership.

The survey placed Nissan's Titan full-sized pickup and Armada full-sized SUV last in their segments. All three vehicles are built at Nissan's new plant in Canton, Miss.

He he, a Nissan bashing thread on AT, surprised it hasn't been locked.

I suspect I won't be purchasing a Nissan product for the rest of my lifetime (unless I get a killer deal), or until Renault sells their holdings in Nissan.

I honestly like Nissan products, but they brought the new plant on line too quickly & introduced too many new models @ once.

Where's Skoorb? His ears must be burning;)
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?

Based on experience with Chassis/Mechanical/Engine performance and longevity of the Nissans compared to comparable domestic Products and said death rate of them.

Huh? The only bad chrysler vans were the ones with mitsu engines and *maybe* the turbo-4. Domestic minivans consistently show up as longest-lived vehicles on the road today...
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
meh, I'm not surprised. All these models are out in their first year and came out in the same general time. I'd give it atleast two years until all the minor bugs are fixed.

Four new products at the same time is a manufacturing nightmare.

EDIT: read the article. Good to see Nissan standing behing their products and applying fixes for them. And all the problems are minor and nothing serious. It looks like Nissan is listening to the customers and doing everything they can to become better.

Regarding sales of the Quest, it's more due to odd options and supply of certain trims rather than no one liking the van (which isn't true). It's an appealng design both inside and out. Very unique. And Unique sells. Maybe won't bring in volumes of sales (and since the sales target is only 80k a year, they know that), but it brings more attention to the brand.
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
meh, I'm not surprised. All these models are out in their first year and came out in the same general time. I'd give it atleast two years until all the minor bugs are fixed.

Four new products at the same time is a manufacturing nightmare.

Makes you wonder how the new chevy line-up will do doesn't it?

Used to be only GM who couldn't get it right in the first model year :(
 

aircooled

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
15,965
1
0
The original Nissan Quest was a joint venture with Ford (Mercury Villager = Nissan Quest). But I think the newer ones my not be.
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
I think some other factors are influencing the survey also, the car buying public has become more sophisticated & less willing to beta test a $30K car they'll have to deal with for some time...
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: NFS4
SUCKERS!

Suckers???

I'm sure even with those problems, those Vans will still be Roadworthy and on the road for many years long after domestic Ford, GM and Dodge Mini-Vans bite the dust.

If the initial quality sucks so bad, what makes you think long term quality/reliability will be any better?

Based on experience with Chassis/Mechanical/Engine performance and longevity of the Nissans compared to comparable domestic Products and said death rate of them.

Huh? The only bad chrysler vans were the ones with mitsu engines and *maybe* the turbo-4. Domestic minivans consistently show up as longest-lived vehicles on the road today...
ummm...Chrysler van's have repeatedly had faulty transmissions from the 1993 models to the current models. Their 4-speed tranny were utter crap. Ford's Windstar minivan had engines that ate headgaskets for lunch and dinner, and spewed out coolant for breakfast..
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
well I'm being "web-sense'd" out of looking for anything about "vehicles" here - I remember seeing (not here) that minivans had much better reliability records than pickups and SUVs, in response to someone listing reliability as a reason to buy an SUV instead of a minivan. They cited a pretty good study at the time; but I'll admit it's a cop-out to say I can't produce that study because of a firewall ;)