- Jun 23, 2005
- 15,891
- 4,894
- 136
Anyone excited for this?
I am not. The service is cheap, but what we get for it is;
-The ability to do what we've already been doing for free for the last year and a half; play online.
-Access to 20 NES games that hold no appeal to those with a NES Classic such as myself.
-The "privilege" of giving Nintendo even more money in the form of two wireless NES pads that snap onto the Switch like Joy Cons for $60.
-Cloud Saves. But you better be careful your sub never runs out. The moment it lapses, Nintendo will delete your saves. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/apparently-nintendo-switch-will-delete-your-cloud-/1100-6461803/ I was excited for this feature, but now I think I won't bother for peace of mind purposes by just keeping my saves local.
I think I could forgive all of this if they would just give us dedicated servers. But having to pay money just for Peer2Peer leaves a seriously sour taste in my mouth.
I am not. The service is cheap, but what we get for it is;
-The ability to do what we've already been doing for free for the last year and a half; play online.
-Access to 20 NES games that hold no appeal to those with a NES Classic such as myself.
-The "privilege" of giving Nintendo even more money in the form of two wireless NES pads that snap onto the Switch like Joy Cons for $60.
-Cloud Saves. But you better be careful your sub never runs out. The moment it lapses, Nintendo will delete your saves. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/apparently-nintendo-switch-will-delete-your-cloud-/1100-6461803/ I was excited for this feature, but now I think I won't bother for peace of mind purposes by just keeping my saves local.
I think I could forgive all of this if they would just give us dedicated servers. But having to pay money just for Peer2Peer leaves a seriously sour taste in my mouth.
Facebook
Twitter