<< And yeah knightbreed let's discuss this... the hardware of the X-box is generalized hardware, the hardware of the game cube is specialized hardware.. i doubt that ANYONE who knows anything about hardware would disagree when i say that the X-box hardware is crappy compared to the Game cubes for games... >>
Tell me. How the hell does the GC having "specialized" hardware make it superior to the Xbox? The only advantage the GC has over the Xbox is the embedded ram on Flipper gives it more real world fill rate. The Xbox has a more powerful and feature filled GPU, a better sound processor, 22 more megs of RAM, and a hard drive which will help load times if the data is chached onto the HDD when the game loads.
[/i] >>
About OS, the X-Box will use the EXTREMELY BIG kernel, same as NT 3.1, 3.5, NT4.0 W2K, XP... this kernel is not only HUGE, it is also very old... yeah, great for gameplay huh, but it was not developed for that, it has only been made compatible...[/i] >>
Besides the fact that the kernal will be stripped to bare bones features needed in the console environment, you'd be amazed how efficient the NT kernal is when it doesn't have to pump out a GUI and run 20+ processes simultaneously like it does on a desktop.
<< The OS of the Game cube is swift, small and only intended for the purpose of playing games... >>
Great, so the GC's kernal will take up .01% CPU utilization instead of the .02% on the Xbox. C'mon be realistic.
<< You can compare them as many times as you like, the X-box looses every time... >>
Take the blinders off.
Of course whenever dealing with consoles, the mandatory disclaimer:
I have no zealotry toward any console, past, present, or future. I have a PS2 right now because my brother purchased it from blind faith of Sony. I have no intention of purchasing either a GC or Xbox on account of not being a console gamer. I do, however, love hardware and any way you slice it as far as consoles are concerned, the Xbox is very powerful.