Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
I never said it was wrong.
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
I never said it was wrong.
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Thanks for the supprt, I don't give a sh*t about less than a buck, like FFS I can get what, a bottle of Nestea? But the tax break is at the expensive of higher Income tax, so that money was mine, until Tax time :brokenheart:
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
I never said it was wrong.
you certainly implied I was out of my mind for complaining about $0.94 CAN.
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Thanks for the supprt, I don't give a sh*t about less than a buck, like FFS I can get what, a bottle of Nestea? But the tax break is at the expensive of higher Income tax, so that money was mine, until Tax time :brokenheart:
I don't disagree with that. You are definitely entitled to the money.
Like I said earlier, get a Mr. Big with it.![]()
Originally posted by: mugs
$.94? Are you kidding me?
Edit: $.94 CANADIAN no less
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mpitts
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
I never said it was wrong.
you certainly implied I was out of my mind for complaining about $0.94 CAN.
Go back and read what I typed. I certainly did not. Perhaps you should attempt to enhance your reading comprehension skills.J/K!
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Bitching about it on multiple Internet forums instead of attempting to call again is the wrong way to go about it.
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Bitching about it on multiple Internet forums instead of attempting to call again is the wrong way to go about it.
Do you not understand the term closed? What will a CSR do over the phone? Guarantee me corporate policy will change? Even then would you take the word of a CSR?
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: mugs
$.94? Are you kidding me?
Edit: $.94 CANADIAN no less
wtf..that has the monetary value of like, well, a hanging chad...
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: DaTT
jm20, don't listen to all those haters, it may only be $0.94, but its 94 cents that was supposed to be cut with our tax break.
I in no way find you to be going about this the wrong way.
Bitching about it on multiple Internet forums instead of attempting to call again is the wrong way to go about it.
Do you not understand the term closed? What will a CSR do over the phone? Guarantee me corporate policy will change? Even then would you take the word of a CSR?
Bolded the key part of my post. The CSR would probably be able to get you a refund of your $.94.
You wanna sell your old Nintendo Powers?
Edit: Looking at your other thread, you want them to "fix" the prices - they can change their prices if they want, even if it coincides with a tax cut. They don't have to change them back.
Originally posted by: jm20
Not very concerned with the $1, if you have been following Canadian news... :roll: There have been some reports of smaller companies pocketing the cash, but this is big. A huge international company decides its time to milk the consumers in canada for a measly $1. I agree they can change their prices whenever they want, but when they change them only after I complained there is something seriously wrong.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jm20
Not very concerned with the $1, if you have been following Canadian news... :roll: There have been some reports of smaller companies pocketing the cash, but this is big. A huge international company decides its time to milk the consumers in canada for a measly $1. I agree they can change their prices whenever they want, but when they change them only after I complained there is something seriously wrong.
No, I haven't been following Canadian news. If you've been following New Jersey news, you'd know we just had a 1% tax hike because our government sucks.Anyway, Nintendo is a huge company with enormous revenues, and you're probably talking about a couple of hundred dollars total for them... I'm thinking this wasn't a deliberate attempt to bilk the public.
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jm20
Not very concerned with the $1, if you have been following Canadian news... :roll: There have been some reports of smaller companies pocketing the cash, but this is big. A huge international company decides its time to milk the consumers in canada for a measly $1. I agree they can change their prices whenever they want, but when they change them only after I complained there is something seriously wrong.
No, I haven't been following Canadian news. If you've been following New Jersey news, you'd know we just had a 1% tax hike because our government sucks.Anyway, Nintendo is a huge company with enormous revenues, and you're probably talking about a couple of hundred dollars total for them... I'm thinking this wasn't a deliberate attempt to bilk the public.
Revenue Canada (CAN IRS) notified the general public like MONTHS ago about the tax cut (nation wide). And while they probably aren't eating caviar over the couple hundred bux they got off the consumers, their coverup was clearly deliberate. They clearly covered it up after I mentioned this to them, and then they tried to dupe me saying I was wrong.
It doesn't even matter if I get my money back off them, I can always file a claim with my government for overpaid taxes, and have the government hound their ass later. I'm more concerned about an apology to me and everyone that overpaid for their repairs. Also reaping the tax cut for themselves is definately not something I support. Whatever, If I get a Mr. Big and an apology with full disclosure that they were wrong thats good for me.
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: jm20
Not very concerned with the $1, if you have been following Canadian news... :roll: There have been some reports of smaller companies pocketing the cash, but this is big. A huge international company decides its time to milk the consumers in canada for a measly $1. I agree they can change their prices whenever they want, but when they change them only after I complained there is something seriously wrong.
No, I haven't been following Canadian news. If you've been following New Jersey news, you'd know we just had a 1% tax hike because our government sucks.Anyway, Nintendo is a huge company with enormous revenues, and you're probably talking about a couple of hundred dollars total for them... I'm thinking this wasn't a deliberate attempt to bilk the public.
Revenue Canada (CAN IRS) notified the general public like MONTHS ago about the tax cut (nation wide). And while they probably aren't eating caviar over the couple hundred bux they got off the consumers, their coverup was clearly deliberate. They clearly covered it up after I mentioned this to them, and then they tried to dupe me saying I was wrong.
It doesn't even matter if I get my money back off them, I can always file a claim with my government for overpaid taxes, and have the government hound their ass later. I'm more concerned about an apology to me and everyone that overpaid for their repairs. Also reaping the tax cut for themselves is definately not something I support. Whatever, If I get a Mr. Big and an apology with full disclosure that they were wrong thats good for me.
You do realize that this e-mail could have been seen by at least a dozen people before it ever reached the person that responded to you, right? I would not doubt if it wasn't forwarded internally to at the very least their web developers, accounting, and general tech support.
The person that finally did respond to you could've checked on the issue AFTER somebody else who was forwarded it went and corrected the problem.
They told you to call the number probably because they couldn't do a damn thing about it. Normal customer service would not have the power to issue a refund like this. It would have to go to accounting/bookkeeping before they could do anything. By calling, they would set you up with the correct people.
Originally posted by: mugs
*sigh*... well good luck anyway. Seriously, if you still have those old Nintendo Powers do you want to sell them?![]()
Originally posted by: jm20
I did infact realize that, and I had included the invoice # of the repair in the inital email. They didn't check plain and simple, its not my problem they hire people who cannot do their job correctly, hell I bet outsourced CSR's would've paid attention. The ball was in their court and they dropped it.
If you feel you that the taxes you were charged are incorrect, we want to help resolve the situation. In this case, it would helpful to speak with you
directly. At your earliest convenience, please contact Nintendo's Consumer
Service Department by calling 1-800-255-3700. Representatives are available to speak to you between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Pacific Time, seven days a week.
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: mugs
*sigh*... well good luck anyway. Seriously, if you still have those old Nintendo Powers do you want to sell them?![]()
Sadly I trashed them a long time ago after water ruined most of themI still have lots of hockey cards
![]()
Originally posted by: L1FE
Nice that you're standing up for fair business practices, bad that you're being such a douche to the people that aren't responding the way you want them to. Whatever the case, good luck.
Originally posted by: jm20
Originally posted by: L1FE
Nice that you're standing up for fair business practices, bad that you're being such a douche to the people that aren't responding the way you want them to. Whatever the case, good luck.
everyone is bias, i am bias for myself. Explain how this is wrong?
