nice week for mass gun violence

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.
And that's a shame... shameful even.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.

2006 called, it wants its edit of the previous posters reply joke back. Still not entirely sure what you point is though.. you say you don't want the guy with dementia packing heat, and then say its no nursing home would allow it. Ok.. so its a problem or its not? Can you make an argument that makes sense please?

Anways, in this example this person stopped a dangerous criminal. I guess you would rather have it that the 71 year old was shot and the criminal gets away just so you can say guns are bad.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.

2006 called, it wants its edit of the previous posters reply joke back. Still not entirely sure what you point is though.. you say you don't want the guy with dementia packing heat, and then say its no nursing home would allow it. Ok.. so its a problem or its not? Can you make an argument that makes sense please?

Anways, in this example this person stopped a dangerous criminal. I guess you would rather have it that the 71 year old was shot and the criminal gets away just so you can say guns are bad.
I never said guns were bad. My comment goes back to another post by some knuckle head who said that those who died that week might have not if they were packing heat.I was pointing out how asinine that comment was as the victims were 6 or 7 children killed by their fathers, some in a nursing home, some immigrants and 3 pistol packing cops.

My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Would you support the passage of a law that would set a maximum age limit for gun ownership? Just curious...
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Would you support the passage of a law that would set a maximum age limit for gun ownership? Just curious...
No not at all.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.

2006 called, it wants its edit of the previous posters reply joke back. Still not entirely sure what you point is though.. you say you don't want the guy with dementia packing heat, and then say its no nursing home would allow it. Ok.. so its a problem or its not? Can you make an argument that makes sense please?

Anways, in this example this person stopped a dangerous criminal. I guess you would rather have it that the 71 year old was shot and the criminal gets away just so you can say guns are bad.
I never said guns were bad. My comment goes back to another post by some knuckle head who said that those who died that week might have not if they were packing heat.I was pointing out how asinine that comment was as the victims were 6 or 7 children killed by their fathers, some in a nursing home, some immigrants and 3 pistol packing cops.

My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Why would you melt down a piece of history? Give your father my information so his gun can go to someone who will appreciate the history of it and not melt it down. That gun may have saved the lives of your father or grandfather at some point, or those they served with if they were in the military.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.

2006 called, it wants its edit of the previous posters reply joke back. Still not entirely sure what you point is though.. you say you don't want the guy with dementia packing heat, and then say its no nursing home would allow it. Ok.. so its a problem or its not? Can you make an argument that makes sense please?

Anways, in this example this person stopped a dangerous criminal. I guess you would rather have it that the 71 year old was shot and the criminal gets away just so you can say guns are bad.
I never said guns were bad. My comment goes back to another post by some knuckle head who said that those who died that week might have not if they were packing heat.I was pointing out how asinine that comment was as the victims were 6 or 7 children killed by their fathers, some in a nursing home, some immigrants and 3 pistol packing cops.

My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Why would you melt down a piece of history? Give your father my information so his gun can go to someone who will appreciate the history of it and not melt it down. That gun may have saved the lives of your father or grandfather at some point, or those they served with if they were in the military.
LOL, it's POS Saturday Night Special my Grandfather bought because he use to carry around a lot of cash. I don't even think he ever registered it and I know my father hasn't. If I ever decided I wanted a gun I'd get something better than that though I doubt I will.

Look I don't have a problem with guns as long as those who have them are mentally stable and responsible.

 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: NeoV
someone to care about the dead people outside of their immediate families. Someone to actually stand up and say we have a problem in this country - not someone to pull stats about people getting killed in car accidents out of their ass. Eliminating drunk drivers would be a great topic too - but again, we are cowards in this country to admit there is a problem there either.

How can you claim to care when your only reaction would be a knee-jerk reaction to ban guns? Ironically, your analogy to drunk driving is more perfect than you seem to realize. We have strict laws prohibiting drunk driving, yet people do it anyway. We have even stricter and harsher laws against murder... yet people do that anyway. Maybe... just maybe... the real cowardice stems from those who think the solution to every problem is to just pass some new law, ban, or prohibition... and then wash their hands of the issue. It's as though the solution to drunk driving were to ban cars.
 

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah just what we need, Mr. Magoo in a nursing home because he's suffering from dementia packing heat:roll:

Arrrghh!!!!! Arrrrgh!!! May hair is on fire !!!!
Calm it son, they should be able to own a weapon but I don't think there's any Nursing Home in America that allows their patients to have a loaded fire arms in the facility with them let alone on their person.

2006 called, it wants its edit of the previous posters reply joke back. Still not entirely sure what you point is though.. you say you don't want the guy with dementia packing heat, and then say its no nursing home would allow it. Ok.. so its a problem or its not? Can you make an argument that makes sense please?

Anways, in this example this person stopped a dangerous criminal. I guess you would rather have it that the 71 year old was shot and the criminal gets away just so you can say guns are bad.
I never said guns were bad. My comment goes back to another post by some knuckle head who said that those who died that week might have not if they were packing heat.I was pointing out how asinine that comment was as the victims were 6 or 7 children killed by their fathers, some in a nursing home, some immigrants and 3 pistol packing cops.

My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Why would you melt down a piece of history? Give your father my information so his gun can go to someone who will appreciate the history of it and not melt it down. That gun may have saved the lives of your father or grandfather at some point, or those they served with if they were in the military.
LOL, it's POS Saturday Night Special my Grandfather bought because he use to carry around a lot of cash. I don't even think he ever registered it and I know my father hasn't. If I ever decided I wanted a gun I'd get something better than that though I doubt I will.

Look I don't have a problem with guns as long as those who have them are mentally stable and responsible.

Glad you follow your own recommendations and don't have a gun! ;)
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: palehorse
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
My father turns 82 tomorrow and he owns a pistol he inherited from my grandfather. I'll probably inherit it when he passes but I'll just sell it or have it melted down as I have no need for it. If I want to go shoot a gun I'll just rent one at the gun range.

Would you support the passage of a law that would set a maximum age limit for gun ownership? Just curious...
No not at all.
k, cool.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: fallout man
Originally posted by: NeoV
April 4 - father kills self, 5 children in Seattle area
April 4 - man kills 3 cops in PA
April 3 - man kills 13, self, wounds many others in NY
March 29 - man kills 7 at a nursing home in NC
March 29 - Man kills 5 relatives and himself in CA

It's ok though, because all of these shooters were criminals, who can get guns anytime they want.

Oh, and it's also the fault of our failing economy.

Place head back in sand, nothing to see here.


If those geriatrics had been packing heat, the tragedy would have never happened.

:)
 

NeoV

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
9,504
2
81
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,363
1,221
126
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: NeoV
My point is - and I'll say for the umpteenth time on here - I'm not calling for a ban on guns in this country - however, the lack of concern for gun-related violence in this country is just staggering to me.

What more do you want then? It's illegal to commit murder. The shooter in PA had a dishonorable discharge, which means it was illegal for him to own any firearms at all. For all intents and purposes, guns were banned as far as he was concerned. Yet he manged to get some.

The answer is not more restrictions on who can own firearms and it's not more restrictions on what type of firearms a person can own. The answer is enforcement of the laws we already have. I can get behind reasonable efforts to ensure that only responsible people can own firearms, but blanket bans on type or amount are just not going to solve things.

ZV

That's the problem in this country. We have plenty of laws in the books but we don't like to enforce them. The common solution is to make more laws instead of enforcing the current set.

How many of the 9/11 hijackers should have been taken care of before 9/11 if the authorities would have done their jobs to begin with? Nobody wants to blame the system for failing us because it's much easier to make more laws and say Mission Accomplished.

 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: NeoV
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?

If you have a solution other than ban guns, let's hear it. You have yet to say anything of substance.
 

IceBergSLiM

Lifer
Jul 11, 2000
29,932
3
81
Suicides accounted for 55 percent of the nation's nearly 31,000 firearm deaths in 2005. 15,000 mentally sick individuals are removed every year from society. why do you want to stop that.
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: NeoV
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?

If you have a solution other than ban guns, let's hear it. You have yet to say anything of substance.

I've noticed the same thing NeoV - I am often told on these forums that I want to ban guns, where in reality the most I ever suggested was a licence test along the lines of a driving test, and actually I'd quite like to own a rifle. Nobody seems interested in the truth though. It's much easier to argue against an imaginary extremist than actually read peoples' posts.

How about this, are anti-aircraft weapons illegal in the states? They are?!? GUN BAN! GUN BAN! :laugh:
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: NeoV
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?

If you have a solution other than ban guns, let's hear it. You have yet to say anything of substance.

I've noticed the same thing NeoV - I am often told on these forums that I want to ban guns, where in reality the most I ever suggested was a licence test along the lines of a driving test, and actually I'd quite like to own a rifle. Nobody seems interested in the truth though. It's much easier to argue against an imaginary extremist than actually read peoples' posts.

How about this, are anti-aircraft weapons illegal in the states? They are?!? GUN BAN! GUN BAN! :laugh:

The only real objection to this from most people is the danger of licensing/registration/tracking. If you could find a way to implement this while allowing gun owners to feel that it wouldn't be used for more seizures in the future, most would probably agree (there will always be some out there that don't believe in compromise). I personally have no issues with it, and have long been a proponent of required safety classes for ownership/carry.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: NeoV
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?

If you have a solution other than ban guns, let's hear it. You have yet to say anything of substance.

I've noticed the same thing NeoV - I am often told on these forums that I want to ban guns, where in reality the most I ever suggested was a licence test along the lines of a driving test, and actually I'd quite like to own a rifle. Nobody seems interested in the truth though. It's much easier to argue against an imaginary extremist than actually read peoples' posts.

How about this, are anti-aircraft weapons illegal in the states? They are?!? GUN BAN! GUN BAN! :laugh:

And you're from the UK where they're going to track every email from every citizen. You wouldn't known anything about the slippery slope, would you...

The day that citizens are required to pass a test to get a license before they can speak in public is the day I'll support firearms license testing.

Come on, meet me halfway. If you want to keep morons from owning guns, keep morons from tainting the air with their idiotic drivel.
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Atheus
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: NeoV
Vic - where did I say, or even hint, that my reaction would be to ban guns? Your reaction is the typical 'gun-lover' reaction - any discussion that might, in the slightest way, shape, or form - cast guns in a 'bad light' is immediately dismissed as a 'ban guns' discussion.

perhaps I should start a thread about problems with reading comprehension?

If you have a solution other than ban guns, let's hear it. You have yet to say anything of substance.

I've noticed the same thing NeoV - I am often told on these forums that I want to ban guns, where in reality the most I ever suggested was a licence test along the lines of a driving test, and actually I'd quite like to own a rifle. Nobody seems interested in the truth though. It's much easier to argue against an imaginary extremist than actually read peoples' posts.

How about this, are anti-aircraft weapons illegal in the states? They are?!? GUN BAN! GUN BAN! :laugh:

And you're from the UK where they're going to track every email from every citizen.

As if I support that shit...

The day that citizens are required to pass a test to get a license before they can speak in public is the day I'll support firearms license testing.

There is something of a difference between speaking and shooting...

Are you against driving tests?
 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Originally posted by: Atheus
How about this, are anti-aircraft weapons illegal in the states? They are?!? GUN BAN! GUN BAN! :laugh:

But they're not.

Very, very few guns are actually banned in the United States, and those that are can usually still be obtained with a police department letterhead.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: Atheus
The day that citizens are required to pass a test to get a license before they can speak in public is the day I'll support firearms license testing.

There is something of a difference between speaking and shooting...

Are you against driving tests?

You're right, speaking is far more dangerous.
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Atheus
The day that citizens are required to pass a test to get a license before they can speak in public is the day I'll support firearms license testing.

There is something of a difference between speaking and shooting...

Are you against driving tests?

You're right, speaking is far more dangerous.

In some parts of the world, its easier to get an automatic weapon then to speak your mind. Vocal opponents are dangerous and dictators have killed many to stay in power (e.g., Sadam, Iran, N. Korea, etc).

Yes, freedom of speech is powerful. Usually however, freedom of speech is only available if there is force to allow it to happen. Freedom of speech and the 2nd amendment go hand and hand. That is why both are in the constitution. Passing a test to get a license for a firearm is like passing a test to get a license to speak. Both limit your rights. Both limit the freedom of the average citizen.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Atheus
The day that citizens are required to pass a test to get a license before they can speak in public is the day I'll support firearms license testing.

There is something of a difference between speaking and shooting...

Are you against driving tests?

You're right, speaking is far more dangerous.

In some parts of the world, its easier to get an automatic weapon then to speak your mind. Vocal opponents are dangerous and dictators have killed many to stay in power (e.g., Sadam, Iran, N. Korea, etc).

Yes, freedom of speech is powerful. Usually however, freedom of speech is only available if there is force to allow it to happen. Freedom of speech and the 2nd amendment go hand and hand. That is why both are in the constitution. Passing a test to get a license for a firearm is like passing a test to get a license to speak. Both limit your rights. Both limit the freedom of the average citizen.

I agree, they are both basic human rights IMO, which is why I proposed the absurd solution to Atheus. Until I'm able to gag his ability to speak his mind, I don't want him limiting my ability to an instrument of self defense.