Dominato3r
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2008
- 5,109
- 1
- 0
Kovalchuk came from an environment where he was the lone guy. Now he has a cast of good players with him, he'll have to learn to play that way.
Not to be a dick, but I hope this deal ends up being a disaster for the Devils. These CBA circumventing deals need to stop...
Kovalchuk came from an environment where he was the lone guy. Now he has a cast of good players with him, he'll have to learn to play that way.
This is me caring
But I agree that the next CBA will have to close this loophole. I'd just point out that we're not doing anything that other teams haven't done as well.
It's breaking now that the NHL has rejected the Kovalchuk contract because neither side actually expected him to be playing toward the end of the deal, especially not at 550k per, and that it was structured that way only to reduce the cap hit.
agreed. these super long term contracts are insaneArticle:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=328025
Apparently it's believable that Roberto Luongo will play for $1 million when he's 43, but it's not believable that Kovalchuk will play for $550k when he's 44. I don't think either is believable.
Article:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=328025
I was worried that might happen. Bleh.
Apparently it's believable that Roberto Luongo will play for $1 million when he's 43, but it's not believable that Kovalchuk will play for $550k when he's 44. I don't think either is believable.
I was actually kinda worried it wouldn't happen. Then again, my team didn't just circumvent the salary cap to sign a superstar - not being snide, I'm sure if the Sharks had done it, I might have went "Damn the league, I hope we get to keep him".
There was 0% chance Kovy would play for 550k. Either he'd retire or he'd say "fuck it" and go to the KHL and get paid more if he was still playing (and they're still around).
The thing is, this kind of gaming is something that should have been anticipated when they made the cap hit equal to the average salary. The rules should have been written to prevent this sort of thing so it wouldn't have to be a judgment call. Clearly there are several high-priced players who have no intention of finishing their contracts. The Devils just went too far.
Article:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=328025
I was worried that might happen. Bleh.
Apparently it's believable that Roberto Luongo will play for $1 million when he's 43, but it's not believable that Kovalchuk will play for $550k when he's 44. I don't think either is believable.
This kind of holds up everything else the Devils need to do this summer, which sucks. If everyone else makes their moves, that could leave Kovalchuk with the Devils and the KHL as his only options. But the Devils still need to get rid of some salary.
I'm not sure it will. We're basically done with our moves, the only thing left to do is get under the cap. The only thing this does is introduce uncertainty w/respect to how much cap space will have to be cleared.
Someone on another board pointed out that the Rangers will almost certainly send Wade Redden down to the AHL this year to get his contract off the books, but that would certainly be a cap circumvention too! If I was Lou I would howl when they tried that.
I expect that in the end, the devils will just move some of the money from the 11.5 mil seasons into the 550k seasons. The net result is pretty much the same.
I'm pretty sure the only possible thing they could reject the deal on is that 550k might be below the league minimum in 17 years.
So the NHLPA filed a grievance apparently over the Kovalchuk contract. No big surprise there. I still don't see how it doesn't fly if Luongo's contract did.
And the Canucks were able to lock down Raymond for 2 more years for 5.1 mil. Seems like a decent enough deal for them. Apparently Salo tore his ACL so it looks like they may be able to get him on the LTIR or they could still dump Bieksa
I'm seeing a lot of articles, some quoting legal types, saying that there's no way the NHL will win this because the contract doesn't violate anything in the CBA. To me, this rule against circumvention seems like a smell test - a chance to use common sense when determining if a contract is allowable. I mean, if the only way to be in violation of this rule is to clearly violate one of the provisions of the salary cap, why would there need to be a separate rule for circumvention? Any type of circumvention would already be covered elsewhere. Judges (and in this case arbitrators) often DO use common sense to make judgments. Common sense says Kovalchuk should lose the arbitration.
