mugs
Lifer
- Apr 29, 2003
- 48,920
- 46
- 91
They need to close that loophole however
I agree, it should be closed. Something along the lines of making the cap hit the greater of the average value or the salary for the current year, but leave open the possibility of a gradually increasing contract by allowing a raise of maybe 20% a year while still using the average value. That way a front loaded contract would cost the team more cap space over the years than they're actually paying out, while a contract that increases each year would cost the same cap space as it does now.
Not saying that's a perfect solution, there may be a way to abuse that too.
I don't know all of the intricacies of the salary cap rules - if a team signed a player to a long front-loaded contract, then later in the contract the player signs an extension (or just a new contract?) with the team for a bit more money in the later years, could that have the effect of LOWERING the cap hit over the rest of the contract?
Example:
$10m, $10m, $10m, $10m, $10m, $10m, $1m, $1m, $1m, $1m, $1m, $1m
12 years, 66 million = $5.5 million cap hit for 12 years
If after the first 6 years they signed a new contract for
$2m, $2m, $2m, $2m, $2m, $2m
how would that affect the cap hit? Would it go down to $2 million? Or up to $6.5 million because of the original contract?
