The reason I don't think it's a fair comparision is because it is just as likely a person can overclock their 2.4c to 3.3gig as it is to overclock a 1700+ to 2.2gig.
So you are comparing the maximum performance possible with the AMD with the minimum performance possible with the 2.4c. I think it's more fair to compare max performance with max performance, or minimum with minimum.
As Evan said the AMD chip doesn't need the advantage of an unfair comparison to justify it's incredible value.
So you are comparing the maximum performance possible with the AMD with the minimum performance possible with the 2.4c. I think it's more fair to compare max performance with max performance, or minimum with minimum.
As Evan said the AMD chip doesn't need the advantage of an unfair comparison to justify it's incredible value.