oiprocs
Diamond Member
The article is on washingtonpost, which I believe makes you login, so I'll just post excerpts:
Link if you want it
It gets rid of a couple pre-season games, which is great. I wish they played 1 pre-season game and moved on.
But it could mean for more meaningless games at the end of the season.
Link if you want it
NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said here Monday the league's franchise owners might vote in May about the possibility of lengthening the regular season to 17 or 18 games per team.
Goodell said he does not expect any votes on the topic to be taken at this meeting. The owners have their annual spring meeting scheduled for May and might vote then.
At this point, though, the owners don't even have a proposal to make to the players because they haven't voted on what they want. The owners appear intent upon extending the regular season but have not officially decided that. And they haven't decided whether they prefer a 17- or 18-game regular season.
The owners apparently would like to lengthen the regular season as a means of potentially generating additional revenue in their next set of network television contracts. They would shorten the preseason by the corresponding number of games, keeping the total number of games at 20 per team.
Goodell said it's unlikely the measure will be enacted before the 2011 season.
It gets rid of a couple pre-season games, which is great. I wish they played 1 pre-season game and moved on.
But it could mean for more meaningless games at the end of the season.