NFL Power Rankings out on CBS

KLin

Lifer
Feb 29, 2000
30,426
745
126
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
You mean the overranked, annual chokers who now don't have Edgerin James in the backfield?

lol sounds about right.
 
Jul 12, 2001
10,142
2
0
lol...he has the dolphins at 6 with and injured QB, but the Bengals at 18...neither will win without a QB and palmers status is a lot better then culpeppers
 

Yreka

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2005
4,084
0
76
#30 Detroit Lions

If they think Jon Kitna and Josh McCown are the long-term answers at quarterback, they better think again. They're serviceable for now, but is that good enough?

:(
 

zebano

Diamond Member
Jun 15, 2005
4,042
0
0
My Vikings are at 17?? I don't know if I should be happy about that or just laugh. The whole NFC north just stinks.
 

gregshin

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2000
3,273
0
0
Originally posted by: MrDingleDangle
lol...he has the dolphins at 6 with and injured QB, but the Bengals at 18...neither will win without a QB and palmers status is a lot better then culpeppers

agree
 

KeithTalent

Elite Member | Administrator | No Lifer
Administrator
Nov 30, 2005
50,231
118
116
IMHO

Too high: Colts and Dolphins

Too low: Jets

How many more hours until the games begin?
 

mcvickj

Diamond Member
Dec 13, 2001
4,602
0
76
Ouch the Lions are #30 of #32. hehe. Of course I didn't expect them to be very high. I still think the QB spot leave a lot to be desired.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
Originally posted by: KeithTalent
IMHO

Too high: Colts and Dolphins

Too low: Jets

How many more hours until the games begin?

IMHO, colts and New England are too high. They outta be behind the Panthers. IIRC we beat the crap out of NE last year. And Peyton gets "happy feet" under pressure, and Panthers can put up a lot pressure with Julius Peppers & company.

The Panthers lacked a good healthy running game last year. I think they fixed that in the draft.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: Abel007
Falcons ranked 22nd. Yea this poll is accurate. :confused:

Michael Vick isn't a QB. Once the Falcons realize this they will get significantly better.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Seahawks at #8? They have an improved receiver corp, better defensive personnel than last year and the only significant player they lost was Hutchinson. And even then they can slide people around to cover his absense. They are going to have the #1 offense this year and they will be even better on defense.

Miami doesn't know who their opening day quarterback is, they lose Williams for the season and they get ranked higher than the 'Hawks? And Denver? Hahaha...

#1 Steelers
#2 Seahawks
#3 Panthers
#4 Cowboys
#5 Broncos
#6 Colts
#7 Jags
#8 Pats
#9 'Skins
#10 Giants
 

jlbenedict

Banned
Jul 10, 2005
3,724
0
0
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Seahawks at #8? They have an improved receiver corp, better defensive personnel than last year and the only significant player they lost was Hutchinson. And even then they can slide people around to cover his absense. They are going to have the #1 offense this year and they will be even better on defense.

Miami doesn't know who their opening day quarterback is, they lose Williams for the season and they get ranked higher than the 'Hawks? And Denver? Hahaha...

#1 Steelers
#2 Seahawks
#3 Panthers
#4 Cowboys
#5 Broncos
#6 Colts
#7 Jags
#8 Pats
#9 'Skins
#10 Giants

Seattle will not have a running game. Madden curse will hit Alexander :)
 

AMDZen

Lifer
Apr 15, 2004
12,589
0
76
Originally posted by: Abel007
Falcons ranked 22nd. Yea this poll is accurate. :confused:

22 for the Falcons sounds about right to me.

You could definetely shuffle teams around, but for the most part I think its fairly accurate. The 10 ten teams, for example, would all still be Top10 even if the Dolphins, Colts, Jaguars and NE are too high, they'd still be in the top10