Originally posted by: PetNorth
Originally posted by: fatty4ksu
Originally posted by: Elcs
I know this isnt an exact science but rather than extrapolating 1.5ghz up to 2.0ghz, why not underclock the 2.0ghz to 1.5ghz, ie. downclock the X2 to match the Intel job's ghz.
Or am I speaking too much sense?
I agree, that would make sense.
It looks like clock for clock, the intel chip has better performance.
JMO
I don't know why I waste my time but...
In this benchmark, it looks like clock for clock, the intel chip has worst performance.
Notice, higher is better.
1º Simulated Yonah 2.0ghz: 521
BTW, optimistic score calculated if you ask me... taking as reference Yonah 1.5ghz score, I would say that 507-508 is more accurate for Yonah at 2.0ghz.
Never a CPU scales linearly... not to mention that 521 (from 383) is higher than a linear scale from 1.5ghz to 2.0ghz (We have: 1.5ghz, 383; so, 521 for 2.0ghz is a 36.03% higher score, when from 1.5ghz to 2.0ghz there is a 33,33% clock increase);
2º X2 3800+ 2.0ghz, 538
.