Newsom breaks with Progressives on transgenders in athletics….

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
It's a "piss them off issue", there is no upside to promoting it other than making republican's angry, and cheating women out of victory's they rightfully won.
This person was born with a vagina, do you want them spiking a volleyball into a girls face and hanging out in a bathroom with little girls?

1741371433098.png
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,138
15,569
136
It's a "piss them off issue", there is no upside to promoting it other than making republican's angry, and cheating women out of victory's they rightfully won.
No its a non issue in real life, but your information diet has led you to be emotionally invested in the thing to the point where it's feasible as a running platform.

If the opposition shuts this issue down by simply not disagreeing with right wing propaganda they will simply come out with another non-issue for you to be outraged over, something you can shake your head at while thinking "retarded libs again" and feeling smugly superior.

You guys are SUCH easy marks. It's rather pathetic.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,286
32,782
136
If you gave conservatives the chance of eliminating either trans people or white supremacists, I bet the vote would go

80-20 in favor of eliminating the trans people
 
  • Like
Reactions: GodisanAtheist

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,228
6,428
136
No its a non issue in real life, but your information diet has led you to be emotionally invested in the thing to the point where it's feasible as a running platform.

If the opposition shuts this issue down by simply not disagreeing with right wing propaganda they will simply come out with another non-issue for you to be outraged over, something you can shake your head at while thinking "retarded libs again" and feeling smugly superior.

You guys are SUCH easy marks. It's rather pathetic.
Once is to many times.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
No. It's really a nonissue and you are a rube for buying into it.

Also, at the NCAA level, one trans athlete is a fucking equestrian rider. I don't think gender really impacts someone's ability to ride or compete on a fucking horse.
Sure is odd how the guy who claims to love the constitution doesn’t have a peep about the president usurping the power of the purse from Congress but has lots of thoughts about a handful of transgender athletes.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,623
13,719
136
Sure is odd how the guy who claims to love the constitution doesn’t have a peep about the president usurping the power of the purse from Congress but has lots of thoughts about a handful of transgender athletes.
I'm shocked that these "strict constructionists" didn't actually care about the Constitution.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,138
15,569
136
Once is to many times.
Uh oh .. Someone without a dick won a womens trophy in some sport I cant remember somewhere I dont know. RED ALERT WE NEED TO PRJ 2025 THIS SHIT STAT.

This is who you are. Dumb as rocks.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
I'm shocked that these "strict constructionists" didn't actually care about the Constitution.
They never did. They just convinced themselves that right wing politics meant following the constitution or something. Turns out it was just right wing politics. (Shocking)

I fully expect these ‘strict constructionists’ to somehow find that the 14th amendment doesn’t mean what it plainly says.
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
8,312
9,688
136
Ugh, Gavin Newsom has always sort of been a slime but god damn it he's always been our (Bay Area/California) slime.

Now it looks like he's out to be no one's slime.

What a fucking dumbass. Cons and Pubs will hate him cuz COMMIEFORNIA BAD and now Libs and Dems will hate him because he's being a flip flopping spineless piece of shit.

Edit: Trans rights has become one of those "only Nixon could go to China" sort of political shitpiles. Until some quantum event births a conservative that isn't a complete clown-fucker, Dems shouldn't abandon the position but walk around it.

Dems need to do a "I'm here to talk about issues that affect all Americans, not 30 of them" and keep trucking. "How does attacking a couple dozen college kids get people to afford groceries?" or "You spent an entire legislative session banning 1 person from playing high school sports, no wonder you didn't have time to help the rest of the citizens in your state".

But its the Democrats so *shrug* you get what you get.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jaskalas
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
Ugh, Gavin Newsom has always sort of been a slime but god damn it he's always been our (Bay Area/California) slime.

Now it looks like he's out to be no one's slime.

What a fucking dumbass. Cons and Pubs will hate him cuz COMMIEFORNIA BAD and now Libs and Dems will hate him because he's being a flip flopping spineless piece of shit.

Edit: Trans rights has become one of those "only Nixon could go to China" sort of political shitpiles. Until some quantum event births a conservative that isn't a complete clown-fucker, Dems shouldn't abandon the position but walk around it.

Dems need to do a "I'm here to talk about issues that affect all Americans, not 30 of them" and keep trucking. "How does attacking a couple dozen college kids get people to afford groceries?" or "You spent an entire legislative session banning 1 person from playing high school sports, no wonder you didn't have time to help the rest of the citizens in your state".

But its the Democrats so *shrug* you get what you get.
Not me, they guy is in it to win and I am comfortable with whom he’d appoint to the courts.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,342
32,955
136
Because in anything other than the most extreme circumstances this is just a trans kid, who's already having an incredibly difficult time in life, wanting to play their favorite sport. These aren't fully grown, fully developed men pretending to be women in order to dominate a sport. If that were the case where are the widespread examples of this happening? Who gives a fuck if some trans girl wants to play JV soccer or volleyball or whatever, especially if they're on blockers or hormones.
While conservatives might insinuate that people are changing genders just to be good at sportsball, I will not. I have no idea what level of competition it begins to matter, but certainly at the highest levels of competition it doesn't make any sense to me that trans females should be allowed to compete.

From a purely utilitarian perspective, I tend to look at benefits vs. negatives. Until someone can explain to me otherwise, the number of women negatively affected outweigh whatever benefits a trans female gains by potentially dominating female sport. A trans female can do anything they want in life except compete to be the best at female sports. Is that an outrageous constraint? I think it's a reasonable constraint.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by posting what I presume are trans males. AFAIC anyone can attempt to compete in male sports all the way to the highest levels as long as they're not taking otherwise banned steroids or whatever.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,949
7,661
136
Newsom clearly has eye's on the 28 election, and appears to be distancing himself from the far left. Presenting himself as a left leaning moderate is a sound move.
LOL calling that the left. That's the GOP caricature of the left.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,273
12,837
136
While conservatives might insinuate that people are changing genders just to be good at sportsball, I will not. I have no idea what level of competition it begins to matter, but certainly at the highest levels of competition it doesn't make any sense to me that trans females should be allowed to compete.

From a purely utilitarian perspective, I tend to look at benefits vs. negatives. Until someone can explain to me otherwise, the number of women negatively affected outweigh whatever benefits a trans female gains by potentially dominating female sport. A trans female can do anything they want in life except compete to be the best at female sports. Is that an outrageous constraint? I think it's a reasonable constraint.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by posting what I presume are trans males. AFAIC anyone can attempt to compete in male sports all the way to the highest levels as long as they're not taking otherwise banned steroids or whatever.
at the most competitive levels, sporting associations decide who is eligible to compete. so why not let them handle it? why use the government as a tool of oppression?
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,949
7,661
136
I don't know any progressive nor leftist who thinks transgender women should be competing in women's sports. This is as much a bullshit non-story blown up by the right as was critical race theory in high schools.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
While conservatives might insinuate that people are changing genders just to be good at sportsball, I will not. I have no idea what level of competition it begins to matter, but certainly at the highest levels of competition it doesn't make any sense to me that trans females should be allowed to compete.

From a purely utilitarian perspective, I tend to look at benefits vs. negatives. Until someone can explain to me otherwise, the number of women negatively affected outweigh whatever benefits a trans female gains by potentially dominating female sport. A trans female can do anything they want in life except compete to be the best at female sports. Is that an outrageous constraint? I think it's a reasonable constraint.

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make by posting what I presume are trans males. AFAIC anyone can attempt to compete in male sports all the way to the highest levels as long as they're not taking otherwise banned steroids or whatever.
I agree at the highest levels it should be regulated (by the sport, not the government), but this is effecting kids at the rec and high school level where it's a non issue. Really it's a non issue at all levels, if it was an actual issue you'd have "men" dominating every female sport, or even just one.

The right thinks people should be strictly segregated according to their genitals. The point in posting incredibly masculine trans males is that they will be playing womens sports and using womens restrooms if anti-trans people have their way. Did you not see the fear mongering BS at Trumps state of the union where he brought out a girl who was hurt by a trans girl spiking a volleyball in their face?
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,623
13,719
136
I agree at the highest levels it should be regulated (by the sport, not the government), but this is effecting kids at the rec and high school level where it's a non issue. Really it's a non issue at all levels, if it was an actual issue you'd have "men" dominating every female sport, or even just one.

The right thinks people should be strictly segregated according to their genitals. The point in posting incredibly masculine trans males is that they will be playing womens sports and using womens restrooms if anti-trans people have their way.
The right is going to force mandatory genital inspections on children with the end result of these anti-trans policies. They're just backed by grooming creeps that want to make it easier to abuse children. Why are Republicans in favor of pro-grooming, pro-child abuse policies?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
I agree at the highest levels it should be regulated (by the sport, not the government), but this is effecting kids at the rec and high school level where it's a non issue. Really it's a non issue at all levels, if it was an actual issue you'd have "men" dominating every female sport, or even just one.

The right thinks people should be strictly segregated according to their genitals. The point in posting incredibly masculine trans males is that they will be playing womens sports and using womens restrooms if anti-trans people have their way. Did you not see the fear mongering BS at Trumps state of the union where he brought out a girl who was hurt by a trans girl spiking a volleyball in their face?
It is things like this that show how true this phrase is - ‘conservatives want government to be just small enough to fit in your bedroom’.

The basic idea is they dislike the government regulating economic activity but they want the government to enforce their preferred social norms.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
Look guys, requiring people to carry health insurance is tyranny and not the proper role of government.

If nothing else this distracts from the government’s actual responsibility of examining the genitals of children before they engage in meaningless competition.

This all sounds ridiculous, because it is. Conservatives - you have a lot of growing up to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511