• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

News Corpse buys out FOX

good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.

Free TV?

CsG
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.
Free TV?

CsG
Yes, and?
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.
Free TV?

CsG
Yes, and?

Free TV News beats pay-for-TV news because it's free.

CsG
 
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.
Free TV?

CsG
Yes, and?
Free TV News beats pay-for-TV news because it's free.

CsG
Oh, ok.




:roll:
 
Originally posted by: Genx87

Believe it or not, there is still a decent portion of this country without basic cable.
I know. I'm one of them.

But the ratings I saw a month ago or so had CBS behind Fox during primetime news.
Link?

Anyway, FOX's ratings are still pretty bad. The only people who are going to watch FOX are the Bushies or maybe someone doing some research or just channel surfing.

Heh...here's a good one:

Fox News gets blown away
Fox's weak coverage of the tsunami in South Asia proves that when it comes to stories with global significance, the nasty, partisan network isn't ready for prime time.
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.../foxnews/index_np.html


Check this out, too:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.../01/10/DDGE5AN1QG1.DTL

FOX and MSNBC are moving away from reporting news and moving to almost pure commentary, it would seem.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Genx87

Believe it or not, there is still a decent portion of this country without basic cable.
I know. I'm one of them.

But the ratings I saw a month ago or so had CBS behind Fox during primetime news.
Link?

Anyway, FOX's ratings are still pretty bad. The only people who are going to watch FOX are the Bushies or maybe someone doing some research or just channel surfing.

Heh...here's a good one:

Fox News gets blown away
Fox's weak coverage of the tsunami in South Asia proves that when it comes to stories with global significance, the nasty, partisan network isn't ready for prime time.
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.../foxnews/index_np.html


Check this out, too:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.../01/10/DDGE5AN1QG1.DTL

FOX and MSNBC are moving away from reporting news and moving to almost pure commentary, it would seem.

Fox beats CNN's every program by a big margin. I agree CNN does a better job during disasters, tragedies etc. But when you say that FOX's ratings are bad, what do you think of CNN or even worse, MSNBC?

heck, even Shepherd Smith beats Larry King.
 
Originally posted by: raildogg
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Genx87

Believe it or not, there is still a decent portion of this country without basic cable.
I know. I'm one of them.

But the ratings I saw a month ago or so had CBS behind Fox during primetime news.
Link?

Anyway, FOX's ratings are still pretty bad. The only people who are going to watch FOX are the Bushies or maybe someone doing some research or just channel surfing.

Heh...here's a good one:

Fox News gets blown away
Fox's weak coverage of the tsunami in South Asia proves that when it comes to stories with global significance, the nasty, partisan network isn't ready for prime time.
http://www.salon.com/news/feat.../foxnews/index_np.html


Check this out, too:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/.../01/10/DDGE5AN1QG1.DTL

FOX and MSNBC are moving away from reporting news and moving to almost pure commentary, it would seem.

Fox beats CNN's every program by a big margin. I agree CNN does a better job during disasters, tragedies etc. But when you say that FOX's ratings are bad, what do you think of CNN or even worse, MSNBC?

heck, even Shepherd Smith beats Larry King.
I have but two words for you:

PIPA study.
 
"FOX and MSNBC are moving away from reporting news and moving to almost pure commentary, it would seem. "

Its not pure commentary. Its news and commentary. You can have a station thats just 24 hours of 100% news, it just doesnt work.

You are trying to compare the cable news primetime lineup with the CBS/NBC/ABC evening news which is on in a different time slot. 24 hour cable news has to compete with primetime lineups from other networks.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: raildogg
good.

nice to see Fox absolutely destroying CNN and MSNBC. tells you what the American people want

heh, even Greta is beating Larry King in ratings
Ayup, CBS still thumps FOX even on its worst days. Tells you what the American people want.

free cable?

 

free cable?

edit:
sorry ckg got to it before me.. the problems with your arguments conjure are so simple to point out that i find it hard that you, yourself, don't see them.

you are either of such low intellectual means that you can't tell propaganda from facts or you're not much more than a 12 year old getting his jollys by getting someone's responded to something he's said.

either way, happy to help!
 
Originally posted by: LordMagnusKain

free cable?

edit:
sorry ckg got to it before me.. the problems with your arguments conjure are so simple to point out that i find it hard that you, yourself, don't see them.

you are either of such low intellectual means that you can't tell propaganda from facts or you're not much more than a 12 year old getting his jollys by getting someone's responded to something he's said.

either way, happy to help!
ah...a returning troll. Figures you missed the point I was making.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: conjur
I have but two words for you:

PIPA study.
Studying the reproductive activities of Toads!?...
How disingenuous.

Educate yourself

Hmmm... actually, the use of the word 'disingenuous' is in itself disingenuous considering the frequency and application of its use and ATOT's penchant for misappropriating higher vocabulary; this particular word having reached its' apex circa presidential campaign 2004. However, people around these parts still cry about a 2000 election being stolen or somesuch so whether a word is fashionable or appropriate is irrelevant.

Buy a sarcasm meter, or borrow one; either way - use one. That in itself may be an education.

Really, the "Toads" linkage is funny 🙂. Go ahead, allow yourself to consider humor...

 
That's an awfully long defensive statement, Sketcher.


But, back to the topic, I found this article with an interesting tidbit in it. 😀

http://www.fool.com/News/mft/2005/mft05011115.htm
To most people, Fox Entertainment (NYSE: FOX) and Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) seem inextricably linked. And News Corp. already owns 82% of Fox. So it makes perfect sense that the publishing empire should acquire the last bit that it doesn't own.

In a nearly $6 billion deal for the unit that includes Fox Television, cable news and sports, the 20th Century Fox movie studio, and the DirecTV satellite service, News Corp. will pay approximately $33.53 a share to simplify the ownership structure.

Fox was originally created to allow investors to buy into the Australian-based parent, which also owns British Sky Broadcasting (NYSE: BSY) and The New York Post tabloid. But the rationale no longer stood after News Corp. moved its headquarters from Down Under to the U.S. and switched its primary listing from the Australian Stock Exchange to the New York Stock Exchange.

The acquisition maneuver is also being seen as a way to block Liberty Media (NYSE: L) from expanding its ownership base and launching a hostile takeover. Liberty's chairman, John Malone, boosted his voting share last November from 9% to 17% when the exchange transition was completed. Now that News Corp. is asserting itself with the acquisition, Malone's equity position would drop to about 16%, although his voting share would remain stable.

While Murdoch has blocked Malone from a hostile takeover, a small, privately held company is seeking to block some Fox programming from viewers' television screens. Mokiepokie Enterprises is marketing the FOXBlocker, a filter that attaches anywhere along a TV's cable wire and operates in the same way that the V-chip blocks adult-themed shows? except that this blocks out Fox News. :thumbsup:

You might ask why viewers simply don't use their remote to switch channels. For each filter Mokiepokie sells for $8.95, it also sends an email to Fox advertisers telling them a viewer is blocking a show on which they're spending money. Profits from the sales of the FOXBlocker are then shared with various left-leaning groups. Even though I actually like watching Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity, I find the company -- whose motto is "Shut the Fox Up" -- to be quite entrepreneurial. I don't know whether I'd spend nine bucks if my beliefs were aligned with Mokiepokie's, but you gotta admire the moxie.


Fox News has been trouncing the newscasts of Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX) CNN, Viacom's (NYSE: VIA) CBS, Disney's ABC, and General Electric's (NYSE: GE) NBC in the ratings, and the cry over Fox's assertion of "fair and balanced" reporting has grown louder. I'm sure Rupert Murdoch isn't losing much sleep over the FOXBlocker, but maybe he'll jigger it to drown out those who say the 7% premium he's offering for the remaining outstanding shares isn't enough.

Analysts expect that News Corp. is going to have to sweeten the 7% deal, particularly since shares of Fox rose nearly 10% to over $34 on the speculation. Some shareholders have already filed a lawsuit on the grounds it's a grossly inadequate offer. The deal is expected to close in the next few months, so watch your local Fox channel for more details. Unless, of course, you've installed the FOXBlocker.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
That's an awfully long defensive statement, Sketcher.

Not defensive at all. Seriously, lighten up and laugh a bit. Besides, who gives a rip about FOX vs Everybody. If ya don't like it, don't watch it... or "FoxBlock" it or whatever. Seems funny to me that the Left ping on FOX like it's a personal issue or something. Step the f_ck away from the tv and breathe some fresh air already.

Next thing ya know, somebody's going to boycott a candybar or something just because some second cousins ' Dad's adopted brother is a party conservative who owns stock in the machine equipment used to stamp a logo on some crispy coated confection.

What does this have to do with anything? Everything and nothing.

Really, the toad thing was funny.








 
Originally posted by: conjur
Your toad thing had warts. 😛
Now THAT's the spirit! 😛

RE: Foxblocker. playing the devil's advocate -> lowering the price to production cost alone would garner more support and likely be much more successful. I'm not saying it would be successful, just more successful. Then again, it could backfire too.

 
Originally posted by: Sketcher
Originally posted by: conjur
Your toad thing had warts. 😛
Now THAT's the spirit! 😛

RE: Foxblocker. playing the devil's advocate -> lowering the price to production cost alone would garner more support and likely be much more successful. I'm not saying it would be successful, just more successful. Then again, it could backfire too.
I'd prefer a Lifetime TV blocker!


Oh wait....I don't even have cable. Nevermind. 😉
 
Why the whole argument on what "America wants". Just bedause we want news twisted in a manner we desire to see it doesn't mean that is news! News should be unbaised and objective as possible. News is NOT supposed to cater to republicans who want to watch a "news show" that REPORTS NEWS in a manner in which they see fit. And News is also not supposed to cater to a "news show" that REPORTS NEWS in a manner they see fit. that is ridiculous!
News, REGARDLESS of station shoul dbe as objective and unbiased as possible.

Political Commentary shows, and "analysis" and any other stupid B.S. show like that where people discuss how this news SHOULD be interpreted as should be SEPERATE from "reported news". This is the stuff of what people want, and what attracts ratings, but all of you guys are too thickheaded too realize that as push to any direction is WRONG. for people to "obtain" news from crap like "hard ball" "oreilly factor" and any other COMMENTARY show is dangerous! And it is worse when the commentary itself becomes integrated into the reporting of this news.

There should be some standard that ALL stations have to meet. The news reported on stations should differ little to almost NOTHING and be as objective as possible. That is the key peice of information~ the rest of it can be mud slinging battle for all I care, just as long as the reporting of news is not the casualty.
 
Back
Top