• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Newegg website in beta testing (EDIT)

Originally posted by: dhoytw
Not a hot deal per say but nice new site
Click to expand...

Perhaps since it's not a hot deal nor related to any hot deal, it shouldn't be posted in the Hot Deals forum but maybe the Off Topic forum since it's off topic. Just a thought.

(and had you checked there, you would have found several threads already created about it)
 
Oh god here we go I'm gonna be covered in POO from all the thread crapping now, oh well I just figured hey a nice new look to a great site with some great deals on it, why not in the hot deals forum, ugh guess I was wrong....lol
 
Unreadable fonts on my 1600x1200 CRT.

Great, why do people have to hardcode fonts? Will they ever learn?

The old site was perfect font-wise.
 
Originally posted by: Chudilo
It totally does not work in Firefox .. thus non Linux compatible 🙁
Click to expand...


Dude you must not be using a current version of Firefox cause that's all I use and it works just fine for me.
 
When are website admin's going to realize that more graphical doesn't equal more functional. Ever since pricewatch's little makeover I haven't been back. I hope this beta doesn't reflect newegg's final design.
 
A new site will not fix what is wrong with newegg. I was a big booster and a big spender in the early days, when the prives were better, the CS was good and there were enver any rebate deals. In those days, newegg was the alternative to other vendors, now I need an alternative to newegg.
 
Using Firefox (latest) and the site does screw up if you are using larger fonts.. matter of fact, it can get downright unreadable since the text gets mashed all together.
This also happens with IE, so it is just bad coding.
 
I vote for the old site. The beta crowds too much stuff into too little space and requires more work to get to the place you want. It might look fancy but the old site is more functional and practical. They could have passed along the money it cost to do this redesign into lower prices. The old site worked just fine if you ask me (even though no one did).
 
Originally posted by: Neptune3000
Originally posted by: SilentVixen
ICK. Change= BAD
Click to expand...


change=BAD+@$$

so, change=BAD@$$

It's all about how you group the terms
Click to expand...

yea... retard

when you add, you cant take out the + sign, only if it was *

know how to do proofs before you try them

MIKE
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top