New York Times Reporter A Chronic Liar.

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
link

Do these people do any background checks? And where were the editors?

Here is the first page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Times Reporter Who Resigned Leaves Long Trail of Deception

A staff reporter for The New York Times committed frequent acts of journalistic fraud while covering significant news events in recent months, an investigation by Times journalists has found. The widespread fabrication and plagiarism represent a profound betrayal of trust and a low point in the 152-year history of the newspaper.

The reporter, Jayson Blair, 27, misled readers and Times colleagues with dispatches that purported to be from Maryland, Texas and other states, when often he was far away, in New York. He fabricated comments. He concocted scenes. He lifted material from other newspapers and wire services. He selected details from photographs to create the impression he had been somewhere or seen someone, when he had not.

And he used these techniques to write falsely about emotionally charged moments in recent history, from the deadly sniper attacks in suburban Washington to the anguish of families grieving for loved ones killed in Iraq.

In an inquiry focused on correcting the record and explaining how such fraud could have been sustained within the ranks of The Times, the Times journalists have so far uncovered new problems in at least 36 of the 73 articles Mr. Blair wrote since he started getting national reporting assignments late last October. In the final months the audacity of the deceptions grew by the week, suggesting the work of a troubled young man veering toward professional self-destruction.

Mr. Blair, who has resigned from the paper, was a reporter at The Times for nearly four years, and he was prolific. Spot checks of the more than 600 articles he wrote before October have found other apparent fabrications, and that inquiry continues. The Times is asking readers to report any additional falsehoods in Mr. Blair's work; the e-mail address is retrace@nytimes.com.

Every newspaper, like every bank and every police department, trusts its employees to uphold central principles, and the inquiry found that Mr. Blair repeatedly violated the cardinal tenet of journalism, which is simply truth. His tools of deceit were a cellphone and a laptop computer ? which allowed him to blur his true whereabouts ? as well as round-the-clock access to databases of news articles from which he stole.

The Times inquiry also establishes that various editors and reporters expressed misgivings about Mr. Blair's reporting skills, maturity and behavior during his five-year journey from raw intern to reporter on national news events. Their warnings centered mostly on the errors in his articles.

His mistakes became so routine, his behavior so unprofessional, that by April 2002, Jonathan Landman, the metropolitan editor, dashed off a two-sentence e-mail message to newsroom administrators that read: "We have to stop Jayson from writing for the Times. Right now."

After taking a leave for personal problems and being sternly warned, both orally and in writing, that his job was in peril, Mr. Blair improved his performance. By last October, the newspaper's top two editors ? who said they believed that Mr. Blair had turned his life and work around ? had guided him to the understaffed national desk, where he was assigned to help cover the Washington sniper case.

By the end of that month, public officials and colleagues were beginning to challenge his reporting. By November, the investigation has found, he was fabricating quotations and scenes, undetected. By March, he was lying in his articles and to his editors about being at a court hearing in Virginia, in a police chief's home in Maryland and in front of a soldier's home in West Virginia. By the end of April another newspaper was raising questions about plagiarism. And by the first of May, his career at The Times was over.

A few days later, Mr. Blair issued a statement that referred to "personal problems" and expressed contrition. But during several telephone conversations last week, he declined repeated requests to help the newspaper correct the record or comment on any aspect of his work. He did not respond to messages left on his cellphone, with his family and with his union representative on Friday afternoon...

 

NesuD

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,999
106
106
Says something about the editors there doesn't it. It is pretty obvious that they knew what he was doing for sometime 1 year at the very least yet they kept him on staff. I would say that he isn't the only one who should get the boot.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
It dosen't state that he had factual details wrong,
but implies that he presented himself as being colser to the news scene that he was.
He, like a fiction writer, interjected his presence at the location for drama.

A publishers clearing house of the internet.

Capturing other writers news releases, and changing the story line.
Kinda like we're doing here, without saying we wrote it.
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
It dosen't state that he had factual details wrong,
but implies that he presented himself as being colser to the news scene that he was.
He, like a fiction writer, interjected his presence at the location for drama.

A publishers clearing house of the internet.

Capturing other writers news releases, and changing the story line.
Kinda like we're doing here, without saying we wrote it.

The Times inquiry also establishes that various editors and reporters expressed misgivings about Mr. Blair's reporting skills, maturity and behavior during his five-year journey from raw intern to reporter on national news events. Their warnings centered mostly on the errors in his articles.

It's nothing like what most people do here.
 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
It's amazing how the New York Times is blaming this guy for everything, while absolving the editors or others above him any responsibility of what this might do to the credibility of the firm. That die-hard liberal journalistic outfit needs serious reform.
 

BaliBabyDoc

Lifer
Jan 20, 2001
10,737
0
0
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
He should Apply for a psotion at Fox News!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




. . . or the goverment.

There's a difference?;)
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: BaliBabyDoc
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
He should Apply for a psotion at Fox News!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




. . . or the goverment.

There's a difference?;)

Well yeah. One group draws their paycheck from Rupert Murdoch and the other draws theirs from . . . oh nevermind.

 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: BarneyFife
Pretty funny stuff. I'm willing to bet that he isn't the only one doing it either.

There was an article on 60 Minutes tonight about a New Republic reporter who was even more blatant, inventing people and events to give him good stories. He even created phony voice-mail boxes, e-mail accounts, and in at least one case, a web site to cover up his bogus reporting.
 

CaptnKirk

Lifer
Jul 25, 2002
10,053
0
71
Could have learned the technique from Harvard Ethics in Journalism.
Same University that schooled Dubya on Economics and Business Leadership.
High D's, low C's, a little F here and there - My kinda Presidential material.

Wouldn't want one of those types that actually learned and remembered anything, would we.

(I'm not saying that the writer went to Harvard, but he got the technique right)
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Could have learned the technique from Harvard Ethics in Journalism.
Same University that schooled Dubya on Economics and Business Leadership.
High D's, low C's, a little F here and there - My kinda Presidential material.

Wouldn't want one of those types that actually learned and remembered anything, would we.

(I'm not saying that the writer went to Harvard, but he got the technique right)

You have absolutely no room to be directly insulting anyones else's intelligence. Your posts are enough of an insult as it is.

 

Dari

Lifer
Oct 25, 2002
17,133
38
91
Originally posted by: Alistar7
so is the times a liberal or conservative paper?

incredibly liberal. I stopped reading it over two years ago. Now I read the Financial Times. It is much more impartial.
 

Alistar7

Lifer
May 13, 2002
11,978
0
0
Well then they are engaged in campaigning for the left and against the GOP, they don;t have time to make sure everything's truthfulll, as long as they can paint the GOP in a negative light....



Whenever I hear some EU, canadian, ETC.. complaining about American media being nothing more than "cheerleaders" for the Govt. I have to laugh at how little they really know about American media.