New Version X1900GT

CKXP

Senior member
Nov 20, 2005
926
0
0
nice price, a solid answer from ATI towards NV's 7900GS, but why lower the core clock(575->512) and raise the memory speeds? also wassup with the odd clocks 512/1314mhz?
 

BernardP

Golden Member
Jan 10, 2006
1,315
0
76
Originally posted by: CKXP
why lower the core clock(575->512) and raise the memory speeds?
ATI was not able to produce enough chips able to deliver the higher 575 Mhz core clock. A matter of production yield. Raising the memory clock is easier but uses some of the memory headroom previously available, and doesn't make up entirely for the loss of core speed.

 

emilyek

Senior member
Mar 1, 2005
511
0
0
Yeah. Looks nice and weird clocks.

I can't decide whether I should get it, a 7900gs, or wait till october for x1950pro.
 

robkas

Member
Aug 7, 2006
152
0
0
been seeing alot of nice coolers on newer cards lately

maybe companies are listening to consumers saying they want cool/quiet products? (i'm assuming this cooler is cool and quiet)
 

Munky

Diamond Member
Feb 5, 2005
9,372
0
76
My guess is they're trying to get rid of the semi-defective r580 cores, and lowering the clockspeed would let them use more of the available cores. Lowering the price is also a good idea, so although the new gt is slower than the old gt, it now only has to compete with the 7900gs instead of the 7900gt. The latter will go up against the x1950pro.